Choi, Won-Mog (2003), ‘Like Products’ in International Trade Law: Towards a Consistent GATT/WTO Jurisprudence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conrad, C. R. (2011), Process and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farrell, J. and Shapiro, C. (2010), ‘Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition’, B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10 (1) (March).
Flett, J. (2013), ‘WTO Space for National Regulation: Requiem for a Diagonal Test Vector’, Journal of International Economic Law, 16(1): 37–90.
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C. (2004), ‘Still Hazy after All These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-Law on Tax Discrimination’, European Journal of International Law, 15: 39–69.
Howse, R. and Levy, P. (2012), ‘The TBT Panels: US–Clove Cigarettes, US–Tuna, and US–COOL’, in Bown, C. P. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2011, American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudec, R. E. (1998), ‘GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: A Requiem for an “Aim and Effects” Test’, International Lawyer, 32: 619–649.
Hudec, R. E. (2000), ‘“Like Product”: The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles I and III’, in Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 101–123.
Kaplow, L. (1992), ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’, Duke Law Journal, 42: 557–629.
Kaplow, L. (2010), ‘Why (Ever) Define Markets?’, Harvard Law Review, 124: 437.
Kress, K. (1989), ‘Legal Indeterminacy’, California Law Review, 77: 283.
Marceau, G. (2013), ‘The New TBT Jurisprudence in US–Clove Cigarettes, US–Tuna II and US–Cool’, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 8(1): 1–39.
Mavroidis, P. C. (2013), ‘Driftin’ Too Far from the Shore – Why the Test for Compliance with the TBT Agreement Developed by the WTO Appellate Body Is Wrong, and What Should the AB Have Done Instead’, World Trade Review, 12(3): 509–531.
Melischek, C. A. (2013), The Relevant Market in International Economic Law: A Comparative Antitrust and GATT Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Regan, D. H. (2006), ‘Regulatory Purpose and “Like Products” in Article III:4 of the GATT (with Additional Remarks on Article III:2)’, in Bermann, G. A. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), Trade and Human Health and Safety, Columbia Studies in WTO Law and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190–223.
Solum, L. B. (1987), ‘On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma’, University of Chicago Law Review, 54: 462.
Trachtman, J. P. (1999), ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Harvard International Law Journal, 40: 333.
Zhou, W. (2012), ‘US–Clove Cigarettes and US–Tuna II (Mexico): Implications for the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III:4 of the GATT’, Journal of International Economic Law, 15(4): 1075–1022.