Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Anomalies at the precautionary kingdom: reflections on the GMO Panel's decision

  • OREN PEREZ (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Binmore, Ken (1993), ‘De-Bayesing Game Theory’, in Binmore, K., Kirman, A., and Tani, P. (eds.), Frontiers of Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Daily, Gretchen et al. (2000), ‘The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value’, Science, 289: 395396.
Ervin, David E. and Rick, Welsh (forthcoming), ‘Environmental Effects of Genetically Modified Crops: Differentiated Risk Assessment and Management’, in Wesseler, J. (ed.), Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops, Springer.
GM-Science-Review-Panel (2004), ‘An Open Review of the Science Relevant to GM Crops and Food Based on Interests and Concerns of the Public’, London.
Harremoes, Poul, David Gee, Malcolm MacGarvin, Andy Stirling, Jane Keys, Brian, Wynne, and Sofia, Guedes-Vaz (2001), Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency (EEA).
Howson, Colin (2000), Hume's Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, David (1777), ‘An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding in Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding, and Concerning the Principles of Morals’, Project Gutenberg eBook (EBook #9662).
Kriebel, D., Tickner, J., Epstein, P., Lemons, J., Levins, R., Loechler, EL., Quinn, M., Rudel, R., Schettler, T., and Stoto, M. (2001), ‘The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Science’, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(9): 871876.
Kysar, Douglas A. (2006), ‘It Might Have Been: Risk, Precaution, and Opportunity Costs’, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-023. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=927995.
Maturana, Humberto R. (1988), ‘Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument’, The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1): 2581.
Morris, William Edward (2001), ‘David Hume’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Murphy, Joseph, Les, Levidow, and Susan, Carr (2006), ‘Regulatory Standards for Environmental Risks: Understanding the US–European Union Conflict over Genetically Modified Crops’, Social Studies of Science, 36(1): 133160.
Nadler, Steven (1997), ‘Descartes's Demon and the Madness of Don Quixote’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 58: 4155.
Perez, Oren (2006), ‘The Institutionalization of Inconsistency: from Fluid Concepts to Random Walk’, in Perez, O. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Peterson, M. (2006), ‘The Precautionary Principle is Incoherent’, Risk Analysis, 26(3): 595601.
Rescher, Nicholas (2000), Nature and Understanding: The Metaphysics and Method of Science, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Royal-Commission-on-Genetic-Modification (2002), Report of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification, Wellington, New Zealand: Royal Commission on Genetic Modification.
Weiss, Charles (2003), ‘Expressing Scientific Uncertainty’, Law, Probability and Risk, 2: 2546.
Welsh, Rick and David, E. Ervin (2006), ‘Precaution as an Approach to Technology Development: the Case of Transgenic Crops’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(2): 153172.

Anomalies at the precautionary kingdom: reflections on the GMO Panel's decision

  • OREN PEREZ (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed