Skip to main content Accessibility help

Socio-economic implications of adopting the EU laying hen welfare regulation in Serbia

  • V. RODIĆ (a1), L. PERIĆ (a2), M. DJUKIĆ STOJČIĆ (a2), N. VUKELIĆ (a1) and Z. ŠKRBIĆ (a3)...


Egg producers in the EU had more than a decade to adapt to Directive 1999/74/EC which prohibits keeping laying hens in battery cages after 2012. Meanwhile, numerous studies have been conducted in order to assess the socio-economic implications of this ban and to evaluate consumers’ willingness to support improvement in layer welfare by paying a higher price for eggs produced in alternative systems. The adoption of such regulations in Serbia with the implementation timeframe of less than two years, and without any assessment of consumers’ willingness to pay a higher price for eggs from alternative systems, places the burden of animal welfare on producers. Considering the overall difficult financial situation of egg producers, this poses a risk that a large number of egg producers in Serbia will leave the sector after 2012.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author:


Hide All
AGRA CEAS Cons., (2004) Study on the socio-economic implications of the various systems to keep laying hens. Final report for the European Commission, Brussels, Contract SANCO/2003/SPC.2003258.
BELL, D. (2006) A Review of Recent Publications On Animal Welfare Issues For Table Egg Laying Hens. University of California, Riverside.
BENNETT, R.M., ANDERSON, J. and LANEY, R.J.P. (2002) Moral intensity and willingness to pay concerning farm animal welfare issues and the implications for agricultural policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15(2): 187-202.
ELSON, A. (2004) The laying hen: systems of egg production, in: PERRY, G. (Ed.) Welfare of laying hen, (CABI Publishing, Cambridge).
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC), (2005) Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer No. 229 (2), Wave 64.4.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC), (2007) Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare. Special Eurobarometer No. 270, Wave 66.1.
FISHER, C. and BOWLES, D. (2002) Hardboiled reality: animal welfare-friendly egg production in a global market, 2001 - 2012: a dozen years crucial to agriculture and trade reform. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and Euro group, United Kingdom.
GODDARD, E., BOXALL, P., EMUNU, J.P., BOYD, C., ASSELIN, A. and NEALL, A. (2007) Consumer attitudes, willingness to pay and revealed preferences for different egg production attributes. Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Project Report #07-03 (
GRETHE, H. (2007) High animal welfare standards in the EU and international trade – How to prevent potential ‘low animal welfare havens’? Food Policy 32(3): 315-333.
LAGERKVIST, C.J., CARLSSON, F. and VISKE, D. (2006) Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: a choice experiment. AgBioForum 9: 51–58.
LAYWEL, (2004a) Description of housing systems for Laying hens. LayWel project No SSPE-CT-2004-502315: Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens, Deliverable 2.3, Last accessed 08/11.
LAYWEL, (2004b) Overall strengths and weaknesses of each defined housing system for laying hens, and detailing the overall welfare impact of each housing system. LayWel project No SSPE-CT-2004-502315: Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens, Deliverable 7.1, Last accessed 08/11.
MAGDALAINE, P. (2009) Trends in eggs and poultry meat marketing. E-proceedings of the 2nd roundtable on poultry economics and marketing, Antwerp, Belgium.
MAGDELAINE, P., SPIESS, M.P. and VALCESCHINI, E. (2008) Poultry meat consumption in Europe. World's Poultry Science Journal 64: 53-63.
NATIONAL FARMERS UNION (NFU), (2001) Egg production quarterly. National Farmers Union, April 2001.
NEWTON, J. (2009) Implications of the ban on the use conventional cages in the UK. E-proceedings of the 2nd roundtable on poultry economics and marketing, Antwerp, Belgium.
PERIĆ, L., MILOŠEVIĆ, N. and STRUGAR, V. (2007a) Effect of housing system on damage of feathers and legs of laying hens. [Uticaj načina držanja na stepen oštećenja perja i nogu kokoši nosilja], Contemporary Agriculture 56(3-4): 259-263.
PERIĆ, L., MILOŠEVIĆ, N., TOLIMIR, N. and ŽIKIĆ, D. (2007b) Results of egg production in different housing systems. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 23(5-6): 497-520.
PERIĆ, L., MILOŠEVIĆ, N. and TOLIMIR, N. (2008) Effect of housing system and hybrid type on the welfare of laying hens, [Uticaj načina držanja i tipa hibrida na dobrobit kokoši nosilja]. Contemporary Agriculture 57(1-2): 188-193.
POLET, Y. (2005) Abolition of battery cages to cost €354 million to EU-25 egg producers. USDA FAS GAIN Report No E35065.
POZA, and MARIA DEL MAR FERNANDEZ, (2007) Socio-economic implications of the different systems of egg production. Last accessed 06/11.
RODIĆ, V., PERIĆ, L., ĐUKIĆ-STOJČIĆ, M. and MILOŠEVIĆ, N. (2008) Effect of housing system on basic economic parameters of the table egg production [Uticaj načina držanja na osnovne ekonomske parametre proizvodnje konzumnih jaja]. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 24(spec. issue): 237-245.
RODIĆ, V. (2009) Poultry sector in Serbia: Challenges of the EU integration. E-proceedings of the 2nd roundtable on poultry economics and marketing, Antwerp, Belgium.
RODIĆ, V., PERIĆ, L. and ĐUKIĆ STOJČIĆ, M. (2009) Economic results of table egg production on small family farms in Serbia: an estimate of the effects of implementing the EU regulations. Contemporary Agriculture 58(1-2): 67-72.
RODIĆ, V., PERIĆ, L., PAVLOVSKI, Z. and MILOŠEVIĆ, N. (2010a) Improving the poultry sector in Serbia: major economic constraints and opportunities. World's Poultry Science Journal 66: 241-250.
RODIĆ, V., PERIĆ, L., PAVLOVSKI, Z. and MILOŠEVIĆ, N. (2010b) Competitiveness of table eggs from non-cage housing systems. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 26(1-2): 117-128.
RODIĆ, V., PERIĆ, L., PAVLOVSKI, Z. and VLAHOVIĆ, B. (2010c) Consumers’ perception and attitudes towards table eggs from different housing systems. CD-ROM Proceedings of the XIIIth European Poultry Conference, Tours, France.
ŠKORIĆ, R. (2003) State and perspectives of poultry production in Serbia [Stanje i perspektive živinarske proizvodnje u Srbiji]. Poultry Business Association, Beograd.
TACKEN, G. (2009) Dutch poultry meat market and Dutch and German egg market. E-proceedings of the 2nd roundtable on poultry economics and marketing, Antwerp, Belgium.
TACKEN, G.M.L., COTTELEER, G. and VAN HORNE, P.L.M. (2003) The future of the Dutch egg processing industry. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, The Hague.
TUCKER, S. (1989) Alternatives? ADAS Poultry Journal 3(1):15-30.
VAN HORNE, P.L.M. (2003) The impact of laying hen welfare on the competitiveness of the EU egg industry. World Poultry 19:18-21.
VAN HORNE, P.L.M. (2007) Impact of EU national legislation on production cost for broiler meat and eggs. Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Strasbourg, France.
VAN HORNE, P.L.M., TACKEN, G.M.L., ELLEN, H.H., FIKS-VAN NIEKERK, TH.G.C.M., IMMINK, V.M. and BONDT, N. (2007) Prohibition of enriched cages for laying hens in the Netherlands; An examination of the consequences. LEI Report 2.07.10, The Hague, Netherlands.
VAN HORNE, P.L.M. and ACHTERBOSCH, T.J. (2008) Animal welfare in poultry production systems: Impact of EU standards on world trade. World's Poultry Science Journal 64: 40-52.
WINDHORST, H.W. (2006) Changes in poultry production and trade worldwide. World's Poultry Science Journal 62: 585-602.
WINDHORST, H.W. (2009) Recent patterns of egg production and trade: a status report on a regional basis. World's Poultry Science Journal 65: 685-707.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed