Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-8cnds Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T09:50:59.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bio-energy production – a threat to the global egg industry?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2007

H.-W. WINDHORST
Affiliation:
Institute of Spatial Analysis and Planning in Areas of Intensive Agriculture (ISPA), University of Vechta, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Ethanol production started in the late 1970s in Brazil and some years later in the USA. In contrast to these two countries, EU member states concentrated on biodiesel production because of lower diesel prices and the constantly increasing number of diesel-engine-driven cars. After several years of moderate growth rates, biofuel production began to increase rapidly. This resulted in an increasing demand for arable land on which corn and oilcrops are cultivated for ethanol refineries and biodiesel plants. Perspectives of future biofuel production in the USA, the EU, Brazil, China, India, and several other countries in Southeast Asia show that the demand for arable land will further increase. This will not only lead to higher feed costs for the livestock and poultry industry but also to higher food costs. At the present moment, bio-energy production is not yet a threat to the egg industry, but it can be expected that the recent scenarios of a possible climate change until the end of this century will lead to a fast expansion of the bio-energy industry.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

BENDZ, K. (2006) EU-25: Biofuels Annual 2006. USDA, FAS GAIN report E 36122. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
BICKERT, CH. (2007) Biokraftstoffe: Wer stellt was her? DLG-Mitteilungen 2: 1820.Google Scholar
BERG, C. (2006) Bioethanol: Unrestrained growth. Agrifuture 4: 1214.Google Scholar
COLLINS, K. (2006) Advancing renewable energy: An American rural renaissance. (USDA Transcript no. 0414.06). USDA, Office of the Chief Economist. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
DE LA TORRE UGARTE, D. et al. (2003) The Economic Impacts of Bioenergy Crop Production on U. S. Agriculture. (Agricultural Economic Report 816). Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
EU COMMISSION (ed., 2006) A Strategy for Biofuels in the EU. (=KOM (2006) 34). Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
GROENA, BILISTER(ed., 2006) Ethanol Production from Suger Cane in Brazil. (Report 1:06). Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
HENKE, J.M. (2005) Biokraftstoffe – eine weltwirtschaftliche Perspektive. (Kieler Arbeitspapiere Nr. 1236). Kiel, Germany: Institut fuer Weltwirtschaft.Google Scholar
HENKE, J.M. and KLEPPER, G. (2006) Biokraftstoffe: Koenigsweg für Klimaschutz, profitable Landwirtschaft und sichere Energieversorgung? (Kieler Diskussionsbeitraege Nr. 427). Kiel, Germany: Institut fuer Weltwirtschaft.Google Scholar
HIS, S. (2005) Biofuels Worldwide. Panorama 2005. (Institute Francais du Petrol, ed.): Paris, France. (www.ifp.fr).Google Scholar
HOWARD, F. (2002) Consistency of DDGS: Still an issue for many poultry producers. Feed International 22 (December): 17.Google Scholar
HURT, CH. (2006) Hogs vs. ethanol: ethanol wins. University of Illinois, Farmdoc: Livestock and Price Outlook 6. (www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu).Google Scholar
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) (2007) (ed., 2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. Geneva, Switzerland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISERMEYER, F. and ZIMMER, Y. (2006) Thesen zur Bioenergie-Politik in Deutschland. (Arbeitsberichte des Bereichs Agraroekonomie 02/2006 der Bundesforschungsanstalt fuer Landwirtschaft). Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
KAVALOV, B. (2004) Biofuels Potentials in the EU. (Report EUR 21012 EN). European Commission: Joint Research Centre. Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
KUMAR, L. and MOHAN, M.P.R. (2005) Biofuels: The key to India′s sustainable energy needs. Proceedings of the RISO International energy conference: 423–438. (www.risoe.dk/publ).Google Scholar
LANGBEHN, L. (2007) Bioenergie: Wer zahlt die Zeche? DLG-Mitteilungen 2: 1617.Google Scholar
LATIF, M. (2007) Veraendert der Mensch das Klima? Der anthropogene Treibhauseffekt. Forschung und Lehre 14(2): 6870.Google Scholar
LIU, D. (2005) Chinese development status of bioethanol and biodiesel. Paper presented at the 2005 Fuel Ethanol Workshop and Tradeshow in Kansas City, Kansas, USA.Google Scholar
LIEBERZ, S.M. (2004) Biofuels in Germany – Prospects and Limitations. USDA, FAS GAIN report GM 4048. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
LIEBERZ, S.M. (2005) EU Approves German State Aid for Bioethanol Plant. USDA, FAS GAIN report GM 5025. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
RENEWABLE FUELS ASSOCIATION (ed., 2006) From Niche to Nation. Ethanol Industry Outlook 2006. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
SCHUMACHER, K.-D. (Toepfer International, Hamburg, 2006) Entwicklung der Getreidestroeme und der Getreidemaerkte in den naechsten Jahren. Paper presented at the J. Mueller, Brake – Expertenrunde NaWaRo. Bremen, Germany: December 15th.Google Scholar
SINGH, S.K. (2006) India. Bio-Fuels Production Report 2006. USDA, FAS GAIN report IN 6047. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
STRYDOM, L. (2006) Biofuels 2006. How is the global value chain shaping up? Paper presented at the Biofuels Finance and Investment World Conference in London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
TANGERMANN, S. and VON LAMPE, M. (2007) Bioenergie: Wo sind die Grenzen? DLG-Mitteilungen 2: 1315.Google Scholar
WILSON, M. (2006) Bioethanol USA: Running short on maize? Agrifuture. 4: 1517.Google Scholar
ZIMMER, Y. (2007) Bioenergie: Auf dem Holzweg. DLG-Mitteilungen. 2: 2225.Google Scholar

Internet addresses: