Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:28:46.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Union Density and Political Strikes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

Johannes Lindvall
Johannes Lindvall*
Affiliation:
Lund University, Sweden, Email: johannes.lindvall@svet.lu.se.
Get access

Abstract

Why do trade unions organize antigovernment strikes in some countries but not in others? This article argues that there is a curvilinear relationship between union density and political strike activity. Political strikes are rare in countries with low union density, since effective protests require a basic level of organizational capacity. They are also rare in countries with high union density, since a government that faces a strong union movement has powerful incentives to adjust its policies in order to avoid open confrontation. But political strikes are relatively common in countries with moderate levels of union density, since it is difficult for governments and unions to find viable compromises when the strength of the unions is not secure. The empirical part of the article estimates the relationship between union density and the likelihood of political strikes in two samples of advanced democracies.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 539 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armingeon, Klaus, Engler, Sarah, Potolidis, Panajotis, Gerber, Marlène, and Leimgruber, Philipp. 2010. “Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2008.” Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Johnson, George E.. 1969. “Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions, and Industrial Strike Activity.” American Economic Review 59, no. 1: 35–49.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio. 2003. “What Is Alive and What Is Dead in the Theory of Corporatism.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 41, no. 4: 683—706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S. 2009. “Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive.” Distributed by Databanks International, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Data with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42, no. 4: 1260—88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, Lars, and Driffill, John. 1988. “Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance.” Economic Policy 3, no. 6: 13–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1984. “Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labour Quiescence and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society.” In Goldthorpe, John H., ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2010. “Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data.” Political Analysis 18, no. 3: 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2002. “Powering, Puzzling, and ‘Pacting’: The Informational Logic of Negotiated Reforms.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 5: 774—90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, and Visser, Jelle. 2000. Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 67, no. 1: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Kubik, Jan. 1998. “Contentious Politics in New Democracies: East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, 1989–93.” World Politics 50, no. 4: 547–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, Matthew, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2000. “Electoral Competition under the Threat of Political Unrest.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, no. 2: 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Industrial Relations Observatory. 2011. At www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro, accessed September 8, 2011.Google Scholar
European Industrial Relations Review. Various years. European Journal of Political Research. Various years.Google Scholar
Faniel, Jean. 2005. “Réactions syndicales et associatives face au ‘contrôle de la disponibilité des chômeurs.’” Année sociale 2004: 133—48.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49, no. 3: 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillieule, Olivier. 1997. Strategies de la rue. Paris, France: Presses de Sciences Po.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzosi, Roberto. 1989. “One Hundred Years of Strike Statistics.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42, no. 3: 348–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam. 1997. Heroic Defeats. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David, eds., Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, and Kelly, John. 2007. “Party Politics and the Reemergence of Social Pacts in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 8: 971–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin, and Kelly, John. 2011. Parties, Elections, and Policy Reforms in Western Europe: Voting for Social Pacts. New York, N.Y.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert, and Aten, Bettina. 2009. “Penn World Table, Version 6.3.” Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, August 2009.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1978. “On the Political Economy of Long- Run Trends in Strike Activity.” British Journal of Political Science 8, no. 2: 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John. 1963 [1932]. The Theory of Wages. London, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jain, Sanjay, and Mukand, Sharun W.. 2003. “Redistributive Promises and the Adoption of Economic Reform.” American Economic Review 93, no. 1: 256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John, Hamann, Kerstin, and Johnston, Alison. 2013. “Unions against Governments: Explaining General Strikes in Western Europe, 1980–2006.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 9.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane. 2003. “Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism.” International Journal of Sociology 33, no 3: 10–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 1999. “Estimating Absolute, Relative, and Attributable Risks in Case-Control Studies.” Department of Government, Harvard University. At http://gking.harvard.edu.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis 9, no. 2: 137—63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter, and Shalev, Michael. 1979. “Strikes, Industrial Relations and Class Confict in Industrial Societies.” British Journal of Sociology 30, no. 2: 164—87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Giugni, Marco G.. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe. London, UK: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Lindvall, Johannes. 2010a. Mass Unemployment and the State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindvall, Johannes. 2010b. “Power Sharing and Reform Capacity.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 22, no. 3: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindvall, Johannes. 2011. “The Political Foundations of Trust and Distrust: Reforms and Protests in France.” West European Politics 34, no. 2: 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1999 [1982]. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, Oscar, and Rhodes, Martin. 2002. “Corporatism: The Past, Present, and Future of a Concept.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 305—31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria. 2000. “From Populism to Neoliberalism: Labor Unions and Market Reforms in Latin America.” World Politics 52, no. 2 (January): 135–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions, and Market Reforms in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, Taehyun. 2006. “What You Use Matters.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39, no. 2: 281–87.Google Scholar
Nam, Taehyun. 2007. “Rough Days in Democracies: Comparing Protests in Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 46, no. 1: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2004. “The Inefficient Use of Power: Costly Conflict with Complete Information.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2: 231–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 1991. “Svenska intresseorganisationer—från lösningar till problem.” In Olsen, Johan P., ed., Svensk demokrati i förändring [Swedish Democracy in Flux]. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlsson.Google Scholar
Scartascini, Carlos, and Tommasi, Mariano. 2012. “The Making of Policy: Institutionalized or Not?” American Journal of Political Science 56, no. 4: 787–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G., and Beyer, Jürgen. 1992. “Datensammlung zur parteipolitischen Zusammensetzung von Regierungen.” Manuscript, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle, and Lange, Peter. 2002. “Where Have All the Members Gone?” Journal of Politics 64, no. 1: 126—53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorter, Edward, and Tilly, Charles. 1974. Strikes in France, 1830–1968. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, UK: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 1999. “RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistic Regression, Version 1.1.” Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University. October 1. At http://gking.harvard.edu/.Google Scholar
Trejo, Guillermo. 2009. “Religious Competition and Ethnic Mobilization in Latin America.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 3: 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Lange, Peter. 1995. “Strikes around the World: A Game Theoretic Approach.” In Jacoby, Sanford M., ed., The Workers of Nations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vernby, Kåre. 2007. “Strikes Are More Common in Countries with Majoritarian Electoral Systems.” Public Choice 132, no. 1–2: 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Jelle. 2011. “The ICTWSS Database.” Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce. 1997. Between Class and Market. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar