Skip to main content Accessibility help

Diminished Expectations: Redistributive Preferences in Truncated Welfare States

  • Alisha C. Holland

In Latin America, the relationship between income and support for redistribution is weak and variable despite the region's extreme income inequality. This article shows that this condition is rooted in the truncated structure of many Latin American welfare states. Heavy spending on contributory social insurance for formal-sector workers, flat or regressive subsidies, and informal access barriers mean that social spending does far less for the poor in Latin America than it does in advanced industrial economies. Using public opinion data from across Latin America and original survey data from Colombia, the author demonstrates that income is less predictive of attitudes in the countries and social policy areas in which the poor gain less from social expenditures. Social policy exclusion leads the poor to doubt that they will benefit from redistribution, thereby dampening their support for it. The article reverses an assumption in political economy models that welfare exclusion unleashes demands for greater redistribution. Instead, truncation reinforces skepticism about social policy helping the poor. Welfare state reforms to promote social inclusion are essential to strengthen redistributive coalitions.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Diminished Expectations
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Diminished Expectations
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Diminished Expectations
      Available formats
Hide All

I am grateful to Andy Baker, Sarah Berens, Charlotte Cavaillé, Emily Clough, David Doyle, Yanilda González, Frances Hagopian, Peter Hall, Torben Iversen, Kyle Jaros, Herbert Kitschelt, Steven Levitsky, Juan Pablo Luna, Brian Palmer-Rubin, Ben Ross Schneider, Hillel Soifer, Glen Weyl, Erik Wibbels; three anonymous reviewers; the editors of World Politics; and participants at workshops at Duke University, Harvard University, the American Political Science Association, and the Latin American Studies Association for helpful comments on previous versions. Sam Maeglin, Lucy Msall, and Madai Urteaga provided excellent research assistance. I thank the Latin American Public Opinion Project and its major supporters (the United States Agency for International Development, the Inter- American Development Bank, and Vanderbilt University) for making the data available and for a small research grant. A National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship (DEG 0644491) and dissertation improvement grant (1263778) supported the field research and data collection in Colombia.

Replication data for this article are available at Holland 2018a.

Hide All
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward L.. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Ansell, Ben W., and Samuels, David J.. 2015. Inequality and Democratization: An Elite–Competition Approach. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Barrientos, Armando. 2004. “Latin America: Towards a Liberal–Informal Welfare Regime.” In Gough, Ian and Wood, Geof, eds., Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press: 121–68. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511720239.006.
Barrientos, Armando. 2010. “Eradicating Extreme Poverty: The Chile Solidario Programme.” In Lawson, David, Hulme, David, Matin, Imran, and Moor, Karen, eds., What Works for the Poorest? Poverty Reduction Programmes for the World's Extreme Poor. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing: 135–48. doi: 10.3362/9781780440439.008.
Bean, Clive, and Papadakis, Elim. 1998. “A Comparison of Mass Attitudes towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985–1990.International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10, no. 3: 211–36. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/10.3.211.
Beramendi, Pablo, and Rehm, Philipp. 2016. “Who Gains, Who Gives? Progressivity and Preferences.Comparative Political Studies 49, no. 4: 529–63. doi: 10.1177/0010414015617961.
Blofield, Merike, and Luna, Juan Pablo. 2011. “Public Opinion on Income Inequalities in Latin America.” In Blofield, Merike, ed., The Great Gap: Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Latin America. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press: 147–82.
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Bradley, David, Huber, Evelyne, Stephanie, Moller, and François, Nielsen. 2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.World Politics 55, no. 2 ( January): 193228. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0009.
Bril–Mascarenhas, Tomás, and Post, Alison E.. 2015. “Policy Traps: Consumer Subsidies in Post–Crisis Argentina.Studies in Comparative International Development 50, no. 1: 98120. doi: 10.1007/s12116–014–9158–y.
Corbacho, Ana, Cibils, Vicente Fretes, and Lora, Eduardo, eds. 2013. More than Revenue: Taxation as a Development Tool. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cramer, Brian D., and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2011. “Views of Economic Inequality in Latin America.Comparative Political Studies 44, no. 9: 1206–37. doi: 10.1177/0010414010392171.
De Ferranti, David, Perry, Guillermo E., Ferreira, Francisco H. G., and Walton, Michael. 2004. Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History? Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications.
De La, O, L., Ana 2015. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America: The Quiet Transformation. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
De La, O, L., Ana, and Rodden, Jonathan A.. 2008. “Does Religion Distract the Poor? Income and Issue Voting Around the World.Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 4–5: 437–76. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313114.
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estádistica. 2011. Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares. At–portema/mercado–laboral/empleo–y–desempleo/geih–historicos, accessed June 17, 2018.
Diaz–Cayeros, Alberto, Estévez, Federico, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2016. The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Díaz–Cayeros, Alberto, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2009. “Aiding Latin America's Poor.Journal of Democracy 20, no. 4: 3648. doi: 10.1353/jod.0.0115.
Dion, Michelle L., and Birchfield, Vicki. 2010. “Economic Development, Income Inequality, and Preferences for Redistribution.International Studies Quarterly 54, no. 2: 315–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2478.2010.00589.x.
Esping–Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Feierherd, German, Schiumerini, Luis, and Stokes, Susan. 2017. “When Do the Wealthy Support Redistribution? Inequality Aversion in Buenos Aires.” British Journal of Political Science, 113. doi: 10.1017/S0007123417000588.
Ferwerda, Jeremy. 2015. “The Politics of Proximity: Local Redistribution in Developed Democracies.” Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At, accessed July 1, 2018.
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Gaviria, Alejandro. 2007. “Social Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution in Latin America.Economía 8, no. 1: 5596. doi: 10.1353/eco.2008.0003.
Gaviria, Alejandro, Medina, Carlos, and Mejía, Carolina. 2006. “Evaluating the Impact of Health Care Reform in Colombia: From Theory to Practice.” CEDEWorking Paper 2006–06. At–06.pdf, accessed April 12, 2018.
Gaviria, Alejandro, and Tovar, Jorge. 2016. “El potencial de la política de vivienda en Colombia.” In Ensayos sobre Política de Vivienda. Bogotá, Colombia: Asobancaria: 51138.
Giedion, Ursula, and Uribe, Manuela Villar. 2009. “Colombia's Universal Health Insurance System.Health Affairs 28, no. 3: 853–63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.853.
Gingrich, Jane, and Ansell, Ben. 2012. “Preferences in Context: Micro Preferences, Macro Contexts, and the Demand for Social Policy.Comparative Political Studies 45, no. 12: 1624–54. doi: 10.1177/0010414012463904.
Gough, Ian, and Wood, Geof, eds. 2008 . Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Haggard, Stephan, Kaufman, Robert R., and Long, James D.. 2013. “Income, Occupation, and Preferences for Redistribution in the Developing World.Studies in Comparative International Development 48, no. 2: 113–40. doi: 10.1007/s12116–013–9129–8.
Holland, Alisha C. 2017. Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, Alisha C. 2018a. Replication files for “Diminished Expectations: Redistributive Preferences in Truncated Welfare States.” Harvard Dataverse, V1. doi: 10.7910/DVN/GTIOIU.
Holland, Alisha C. 2018b. Supplementary material for “Diminished Expectations: Redistributive Preferences in Truncated Welfare States.” doi: 10.1017/S0043887118000096.
Holland, Alisha C., and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2017. “Easy and Hard Redistribution: The Political Economy of Welfare States in Latin America.Perspectives on Politics 15, no. 4: 9881006. doi: 10.1017/S1537592717002122.
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2012a. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Huber, Evelyne, and D., John 2012b. Latin America and the Caribbean Political Dataset, 1945–2012. University of North Carolina. At–works/data/, accessed June 16, 2018.
Hunter, Wendy, and Brill, Robert. 2016. “‘Documents, Please’: Advances in Social Protection and Birth Certification in the Developing World.World Politics 68, no. 2 (April): 191228. doi: 10.1017/S0043887115000465.
Hunter, Wendy, and Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2009. “Democracy and Social Policy in Brazil: Advancing Basic Needs, Preserving Privileged Interests.Latin American Politics and Society 51, no. 2: 2958. doi: 10.1111/j.1548–2456.2009.00047.x.
International Monetary Fund. 2017. World Revenue Longitudinal Data (WoRLD). At–revenue–longitudinal–dat, accessed July 3, 2018.
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.American Political Science Review 100, no. 2: 165–81. doi: 10.1017/S0003055406062083.
Kasara, Kimuli, and Suryanarayan, Pavithra. 2016. “Bureaucratic Capacity and Class Voting: Evidence from Across the World and the United States.” Paper presented at the Duke University Conference on Redistributive Preferences, Durham, April 2930, 2016. At–capacity–and–class–voting–150416.pdf, accessed May 2, 2018.
Kaufman, Robert R. 2009. “The Political Effects of Inequality in Latin America: Some Inconvenient Facts.Comparative Politics 41, no. 3: 359–79. doi: 10.5129/001041509X12911362972359.
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk A., Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Korpi, Walter, and Palme, Joakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.American Sociological Review 63, no. 5: 661–87. doi: 10.2307/2657333.
Kruks–Wisner, Gabrielle. 2018. “The Pursuit of Social Welfare: Citizen Claim–Making in Rural India.World Politics 70, no. 1 ( January): 122–63. doi: 10.1017/S0043887117000193.
Kuziemko, Ilyana, Buell, Ryan W., Reich, Taly, and Norton, Michael I.. 2014. “‘Last–Place Aversion’: Evidence and Redistributive Implications.Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, no. 1: 105–49. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjt035.
Kyle, Jordan. 2018. “Local Corruption and Popular Support for Fuel Subsidy Reform in Indonesia.” Comparative Political Studies. doi: 10.1177/0010414018758755.
Levy, Santiago, and Schady, Norbert. 2013. “Latin America's Social Policy Challenge: Education, Social Insurance, Redistribution.Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 2: 193218. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.2.193.
Lindert, Peter H. 2004. Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Linos, Katerina, and West, Martin. 2003. “Self–Interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution: Re–Addressing the Issue of Cross–National Variation.European Sociological Review 19, no. 4: 393409. doi: 10.1093/esr/19.4.393.
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Soifer, Hillel David. 2017. “Capturing Sub–National Variation in State Capacity: A Survey–Based Approach.American Behavioral Scientist 61, no. 8: 887907. doi: 10.1177/0002764217720964.
Lustig, Nora, Pessino, Carola, and Scott, John. 2014. “The Impact of Taxes and Social Spending on Inequality and Poverty in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay: Introduction to the Special Issue.Public Finance Review 42, no. 3: 287303. doi: 10.1177/1091142113506931.
Mahler, Vincent A. 2010. “Government Inequality Reduction in Comparative Perspective: A Cross–National Study of the Developed World.Polity 42, no. 4: 511–41. doi: 10.1057/pol.2010.14.
Mares, Isabela. 2005. “Social Protection Around the World: External Insecurity, State Capacity, and Domestic Political Cleavages.Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 6: 623–51. doi: 10.1177/0010414004274403.
Mares, Isabela, and Young, Lauren. 2016. “Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes.Annual Review of Political Science 19: 267–88. doi: 10.1146/annurevpolisci–060514–120923.
Medina, Carlos, Núñez, Jairo, and Tamayo, Jorge Andrés. 2013. “The Unemployment Subsidy Program in Colombia: An Assessment.” IDB Working Paper 369. Washington, D.C.: Interamerican Development Bank. At:, accessed April 12, 2018.
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.Journal of Political Economy 89, no. 5: 914–27. doi: 10.1086/261013.
Milanovic, Branko. 2000. “The Median–Voter Hypothesis, Income Inequality, and Income Redistribution: An Empirical Test with the Required Data.European Journal of Political Economy 16, no. 3: 367410. doi: 10.1016/S0176–2680(00)00014–8.
Moene, Karl Ove, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution.American Political Science Review 95, no. 4: 859–74. At
Moene, Karl Ove, and Wallerstein, Michael. 2003. “Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis.World Politics 55, no. 4 ( July): 485516. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0022.
Moller, Lars Christian. 2012. “Fiscal Policy in Colombia: Tapping Its Potential for a More Equitable Society.” Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 6092. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. At:–policy–in–Colombia–tapping–its–potential–for–a–more–equitable–society, accessed April 12, 2018.
Morgan, Jana, and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2010. “Explaining Public Attitudes toward Fighting Inequality in Latin America.Poverty and Public Policy 2, no. 3: 79– 111. doi: 10.2202/1944–2858.1091.
Morgan, Jana, and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2017. “Social Patterns of Inequality, Partisan Competition, and Latin American Support for Redistribution.Journal of Politics 79, no. 1: 193209. doi: 10.1086/687412.
Morrison, Kevin M. 2009. “Oil, Nontax Revenue, and the Redistributional Foundations of Regime Stability.International Organization 63, no. 1: 107–38. doi: 10.1017/S0020818309090043.
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. “On the State, Democratization, and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.World Development 21, no. 8: 1355–69. doi: 10.1016/0305–750X(93)90048–E.
Otero Bahamon, Silvia. 2016. “When the State Minds the Gap: The Politics of Subnational Inequality in Latin America's Social Development.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University.
Perotti, Roberto. 1996. “Growth, Income Distribution, and Democracy: What the Data Say.Journal of Economic Growth 1, no. 2: 149–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00138861.
Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.World Politics 45, no. 4 ( July): 595628. doi: 10.2307/2950710.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York, N.Y.: Pantheon Books.
Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. Inequality and Prosperity: Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Rehm, Philipp, Hacker, Jacob S., and Schlesinger, Mark. 2012. “Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State.American Political Science Review 106, no. 2: 386406. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000147.
Rizzo, Tesalia. 2018. “When Clients Exit: Breaking the Clientelistic Feedback Loop.” Working Paper. At, accessed May 1, 2018.
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America's Neoliberal Era.Studies in Comparative International Development 36, no. 4: 333. doi: 10.1007/BF02686331.
Romer, Thomas. 1975. “Individual Welfare, Majority Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax.Journal of Public Economics 4, no. 2: 163–85. doi: 10.1016/0047–2727(75)90016–X.
Rueda, David, and Stegmueller, Daniel. 2016. “The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe.American Journal of Political Science 60, no. 2: 472–89. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12212.
Skoufias, Emmanuel, Lindert, Kathy, and Shapiro, Joseph. 2010. “Globalization and the Role of Public Transfers in Redistributing Income in Latin America and the Caribbean.World Development 38, no. 6: 895907. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.02.014.
Soifer, Hillel David. 2013. “State Power and the Economic Origins of Democracy.Studies in Comparative International Development 48, no. 1: 122. doi: 10.1007/s12116–012–9122–7.
Solt, Frederick. 2016. “The Standardized World Income Inequality Database.Social Science Quarterly 97, no. 5: 1267–81. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12295.
Soss, Joe, and Schram, Sanford F.. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.American Political Science Review 101, no. 1: 111–27. doi: 10.1017/S0003055407070049.
Trump, Kris–Stella. 2017. “Income Inequality Influences Perceptions of Legitimate Income Differences.” British Journal of Political Science, 124. doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000326.
Wibbels, Erik, and Ahlquist, John S.. 2011. “Development, Trade, and Social Insurance.International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 1: 125–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2478.2010.00638.x.
World Bank. 2017. Worldwide Governance Indicators. At–governance–indicators, accessed July 3, 2018.
World Bank. 2018. ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection Indicators of Resilience and Equity. At, accessed May 25, 2018.
Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.American Journal of Political Science 36, no. 3: 579616. doi: 10.2307/2111583.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Politics
  • ISSN: 0043-8871
  • EISSN: 1086-3338
  • URL: /core/journals/world-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Holland supplementary material
Holland supplementary material 1

 PDF (312 KB)
312 KB
Supplementary materials

Holland supplementary material
Holland supplementary material 2

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed