Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T01:26:45.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control Practices and Research for Sugar Cane in Hawaii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Noel S. Hanson
Noel S. Hanson*
Affiliation:
Weed Control Research, Experiment Station, HSPA

Abstract and summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Chemical control of weeds in the Hawaiian sugar industry began in 1913 when experiments with sodium arsenite were first conducted on the Island of Hawaii. Sodium arsenite and some sodium chlorate were the main herbicides in use until a concentrated, activated diesel emulsion (CADE) was developed in 1944. From that time on the chlorophenoxyacetic acids and their compounds, sodium trichloroacetate, sodium 2,2-dichloropropionate, and the substituted ureas and triazines have, in turn, been incorporated into use on plantations for weed control. At present, over a half million acres are sprayed each year at a cost of nearly seven million dollars for labor and material.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1962 , pp. 192 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 Weed Science Society of America 

References

Literature Cited

1. Burr, G. O., and Ashton, F. M. 1948. The effect of soil type on 2,4-D injury to plant cane. Rep. Hawaiian Sugar Technol. 6th Ann. Meeting 59–69.Google Scholar
2. Eckart, C. F. 1913. Report of the committee on cultivation and fertilization on unirrigated plantations. Hawaiian Planters Rec. 10 (2):101–105.Google Scholar
3. Hance, F. E. 1931. Weed control. Proc. 51st Ann. Meeting, Hawaiian Sugar Planters Assoc. 257–309.Google Scholar
4. Hance, F. E. 1938. Chemical weed control. Hawaiian Planters Rec. 41 (1):3–37.Google Scholar
5. Hance, F. E. 1948. Weed control on Hawaiian sugar-cane lands—contact herbicides. Hawaiian Planters Rec. 52 (2):93–105.Google Scholar
6. Hanson, N. S. 1948. Weed control experiments and practices in sugar-cane production. Hawaiian Planters Rec. 52 (2):113–154.Google Scholar
7. Hanson, N. S. 1948. The mechanics of spraying herbicides for weed control. Rept. Hawaiian Sugar Technol. 6th Ann. Meeting 83–102.Google Scholar
8. Hanson, N. S. and Bumanglag, J. 1957. Testing of new herbicides. Rep. Hawaiian Sugar Technol. 16th Ann. Meeting 130–133.Google Scholar
9. Hanson, N. S. 1959. Chemical weed control in Hawaii. Proc. Intern. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 10th Congr. 538–549.Google Scholar
10. Sherburne, H. R., and Freed, V. H. 1954. Adsorption of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea as a function of soil constituents. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2:937–939.Google Scholar
11. Yates, W. E. 1960. Minimizing spray drift hazards. Down to Earth 16 (2):15–19.Google Scholar
12. Yuen, Q. H., and Hilton, H. W. 1962. Adsorption of monuron and diuron by Hawaiian sugarcane soils. J. Agr. Food Chem. (In press).Google Scholar