Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:26:53.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Placements of 2,4,5-T Basal Spray for Control of Blackjack Oak

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Fred A. Peevy
Fred A. Peevy*
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, cooperating with the Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Alexandria, Louisiana
Get access

Abstract

Placements which did not wet the root collar and sprouting zone gave poor kills of roots.

Type
Brief Paper
Information
Weeds , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 1962 , pp. 74 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bramble, W. C., Worley, D. P., and Brynes, W. R. 1953. Effects of placement of dormant basal spray on sap killing and sprouting of scrub oak. Proc. NEWCC 7:309–311.Google Scholar
2. Coulter, L. L. 1952. Two primary factors influencing results in the control of oak during the dormant period. Down to Earth, 7(4):2–3.Google Scholar
3. Martin, S. C., Nichols, J. M., and Klingman, D. L. 1954. Controlling woody plants with 2,4,5–T, 2,4–D, and Ammate. Missouri Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 615.Google Scholar
4. McQuilkin, W. E. 1957. The key to effective basal spraying of woody plants: Wet the root collar. J. Forestry 55:143–144.Google Scholar
5. Peevy, Fred A. 1961. Control of blackjack oak by basal spray with 2,4,5–T. Weeds 9:50–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar