Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:03:40.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics and Control of Camelthorn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Harold D. Kerr ,
W. C. Robocker  and
T. J. Muzik
Harold D. Kerr
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, and Pullman, Washington
W. C. Robocker
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland, and Pullman, Washington
T. J. Muzik
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
Get access

Abstract

Alhagi pseudalhagi (Bieb.) Desv. (camelthorn) was in troduced into California about 1915, and into the State of Washington about 1935. Here, it was declared a primary noxious weed in 1955. Seeds scarified with sulfuric acid germinated 90–98 per cent at 25 C. Some seeds were viable after burial one year in soil or submergence for 9 months in running water. Seedlings in the infested area were found only in bovine manure. Tests indicated scarification and transportation of seed in the rumen could accelerate the spread of camelthorn. Lack of favorable moisture and soil temperature at the same time prevented establishment of camelthorn planted at several locations. Eradication resulted from treatment with 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid (2,3,6-TBA). Three repeated sprays with esters of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) within a growing season gave control; however, control did not appear to be directly related to depletion of reserve foods in the roots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1965 , pp. 156 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ball, W. S. and Robbins, W. W. 1933. Camelthorn, Alhagi camelorum Fisch. Monthly Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 22:258–260.Google Scholar
2. Barrier, G. E. and Loomis, W. E. 1957. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and P-32 by leaves. Plant Physiol. 32:225.Google Scholar
3. Beal, J. M. 1945. Histological reactions of bean plants to certain of the substituted phenoxy compounds. Bot. Gaz. 107:200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Birand, Hikmet Ahmet. 1938. Untersuchungen zur Wasserökologie der Steppenpflanzen bei Ankara. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 87:93–172.Google Scholar
5. Bottel, A. E. 1933. Introduction and control of camelthorn, Alhagi camelorum Fisch. Mon. Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 22:261–263.Google Scholar
6. Bruch, Emro C. 1961. 1962 California Dept. of Agr. Buried Seed Project-1960. Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 50:29–30.Google Scholar
7. Burtch, L. A. 1938. Control of camelthorn in Kern County. Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 22:261–263.Google Scholar
8. Cords, H. P. and Badiei, A. A. 1964. Root reserves and susceptibility to systemic herbicides in two phreatophytes. Weeds 12:299–301.Google Scholar
9. Goss, W. L. 1933. Buried seed experiment. Mon. Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 22:302–304.Google Scholar
10. Goss, W. L. 1939. Germination of buried weed seeds. Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 28:132–135.Google Scholar
11. Graham, E. H. 1941. Legumes for erosion control and wildlife. U. S. Dept. of Agr. Misc. Pub. 412, U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington. 153 p.Google Scholar
12. Kassas, M. 1952a. On the reproductive capacity and life cycle of Alhagi maurorum . Proc., Egyptian Acad. Sciences 8:114–122.Google Scholar
13. Kassas, M. 1952b. On the distribution of Alhagi maurorum in Egypt. Proc., Egyptian Acad. Sciences 8:140–151.Google Scholar
14. Kearney, T. A. and Peebles, R. H. 1951. Arizona flora. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 1031 p.Google Scholar
15. Keller, Boris. 1925. Halophyten- und xerophyten-studien. J. Ecol. 13:224–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Keller, B. A. and Shaparenko, C. C. 1933. Mateiaux ce rapportant a une monographic systematique-ecologique du genre Alhagi Tourn. ex Adans. Sovetskaia Botanika 3–4: 150–185.Google Scholar
17. Klingman, G. C. and Ahlgren, G. H. 1951. Effects of 2,4-D on dry weight, reducing sugars, total sugars, polysaccharides, nitrogen, and allyl sulfide in wild garlic. Bot. Gaz. 113:119–134.Google Scholar
18. Koehler, James W., Pryor, M. R. and Pratt, C. E. 1956. Camelthorn—new approaches to eradication. Bull., California State Dept. Agr. 45:229–232.Google Scholar
19. Linder, P. F., Brown, J. W., and Mitchell, J. W. 1949. Movement of externally applied phenoxy compounds in bean plants in relation to conditions favoring carbohydrate translocation. Bot. Gaz. 110:628–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Linscott, D. L. and McCarty, M. K. 1962. Effect of mowing and 2,4-D on carbohydrate content and amount of ironweed roots. Weeds 10:298–303.Google Scholar
21. Mitchell, J. W. and Brown, J. W. 1946. Movement of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid stimulus and its relation to the translocation of organic food materials in plants. Bot. Gaz. 107:393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Munz, P. A. and Keck, D. D. 1959. A California flora. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley. 1681 p.Google Scholar
23. Post, George E. 1932. Flora of Syria, Palestine, and Sinai, Vol. I. Revised and enlarged by J. E. Dinsmore, American Univ. of Beirut, Beirut. 415 p.Google Scholar
24. Rasmussen, L. W. 1949. The physiological action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on dandelion, Taraxacum officinale . Plant Physiol. 22:377–392.Google Scholar
25. Richardson, J. M. 1953. Camelthorn (Alhagi camelorum Fisch). J. Dept. Agr. South Australia 57:18–20, 33.Google Scholar
26. Shmueli, E. 1948. The water balance of some plants of the Dead Sea Salines. Palestine J. Bot., Jerusalem Series 4: 117–143.Google Scholar
27. Tschirley, F. H. and Hull, H. M. 1959. Susceptibility of velvet mesquite to an amine and an ester of 2,4,5-T as related to various biological and meteorological factors. Weeds 7:427–435.Google Scholar
28. Tukey, H. B., Hamner, C. L. and Imhofe, Barbara. 1945. Histological changes in bindweed and sow thistle following applications of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in herbicidal concentrations. Bot. Gaz. 107:62–73.Google Scholar
29. Van der Walt, J. L. 1955. The camel-thorn bush. Farming in South Africa 30:401–403.Google Scholar
30. Volkens, Georg. 1887. Die Flora der Egyptisch-Arabischen Wüste auf Frundlage Anatomisch-Physiologischer Forschungen. p. 119 and Figs. 7 & 8 in Table III. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
31. Warren, A. L. 1931. Camelthorn or Caspian manna, Alhagi camelorum Fisch. J. Dept. Agr. South Australia 35:31–34.Google Scholar
32. Weaver, M. L. and Nylund, R. E. 1963. Factors influencing the tolerance of peas to MCPA. Weeds 11:142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar