Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:46:07.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Rotational Crop Response to MON 37500

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason P. Kelley
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: tfp@agr.okstate.edu

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in north-central Oklahoma to evaluate the effects of MON 37500 at 35, 70, and 140 g ai/ha applied to wheat on rotational crops seeded no-till 16 to 29 mo after treatment (MAT). Wheat yields were not reduced by MON 37500 at site 1 but at site 2 were decreased 6, 11, and 24% by 35, 70, and 140 g/ha, respectively. Wheat yield reductions at site 2 were attributed to late seeding, small wheat growth stage, and cool, wet weather during the month after application. Corn and soybean seeded approximately 16 MAT were not visibly injured by residual MON 37500 at any rate at either site. At site 1 grain sorghum seeded 17 MAT was visibly injured by residual MON 37500 applied at 70 and 140 g/ha (soil pH value 6.4), and grain yield was reduced 58% by residual MON 37500 applied at 140 g/ha. Grain sorghum seeded 17 MAT was not visibly injured at site 2 (soil pH value 5.0), and that seeded 29 MAT was not injured at either site. Sunflower seeded 17 MAT at site 1 was visibly injured by residual MON 37500 at 140 g/ha, and yield was reduced 17% but at site 2 was not affected by MON 37500. Sunflower seeded 29 MAT was not injured at either site.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 59 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. and Barrett, M. R. 1985. Residual phytotoxicity of chlorsulfuron in two soils. J. Environ. Qual. 14: 111114.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. and Humburg, N. E. 1987. Field duration of chlorsulfuron bioactivity in the central Great Plains. J. Environ. Qual. 16: 263266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 2000. Maverick herbicide. In Crop Protection Reference. 16th ed. New York: Chemical and Pharmaceutical. pp. 13671370.Google Scholar
Bartlett, B. 2000. Oklahoma crop production. In Bloyd, B. and Shepler, G., eds. Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics Service. pp. 1047.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylurea herbicides. Chapter 3. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds, Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Hamman, W. M. 1998. Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with MON 37500. Weed Technol. 12: 421425.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Factors influencing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) injury from sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 724730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 2001. Grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) response to MKH 6561 and MON 37500 residues in soil. Weed Technol. 15: 767770.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., and Hargett, J. G. 1999. Environmental and application effects on MON 37500 efficacy and phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 47: 736739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. 1998. Herbicide Handbook, Supplement. 7th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 4952.Google Scholar
Mersie, W. and Foy, C. L. 1985. Phytotoxicity and adsorption of chlorsulfuron as affected by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33: 564568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J. R. and Hamman, W. M. 2001. Factors affecting the toxicity of MON 37500 residues to following crops. Weed Technol. 15: 4247.Google Scholar
Rainbolt, C. R., Thill, D. C., and Ball, D. A. 2001. Response of rotational crops to BAY MKH 6561. Weed Technol. 15: 365374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. C., Peeper, T. F., and Koscelny, J. A. 1995. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield response to winter annual broadleaf weed control. Weed Technol. 9: 594598.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L., Thill, D. C., Price, W. J., and Ball, D. A. 1998. Response of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and rotational crops to MON 37500. Weed Technol. 12: 690698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. 2000. Oklahoma agricultural soil test summary 1994–1999. Stillwater, OK: Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University Report CR-2247. 4 p.Google Scholar