Skip to main content Accessibility help

Weed management practices in Argentina crops

  • Julio Alejandro Scursoni (a1), Alejandra Carolina Duarte Vera (a2), Fernando Hugo Oreja (a3), Betina Claudia Kruk (a4) and Elba Beatriz de la Fuente (a5)...


Data from surveys are used to help quantitatively diagnose the relative importance of chemical and nonchemical management practices, identify weed problems, and provide potential solutions. However, to our knowledge, such surveys have not been conducted in Argentina. In 2016, advisors and crop producers from cropping areas across Argentina were surveyed through email with the objectives to identify the main weed species problems and assess the use of chemical and nonchemical weed management practices in different crop production areas in Argentina. Fleabane, pigweed, johnsongrass, fingergrass, goosegrass, barnyardgrass, and ryegrass were considered the most important weeds. More than 53% of the producers used only chemical options; 86% used chemical fallow (i.e., keeping weed free with chemical application); 62% used full herbicide rates; 46% used proper herbicide timing; 41% used multiple modes of action; and 32% used rotation of herbicide modes of action. The main nonchemical practices used were crop rotation (45%); avoiding seed production during (31%) and after (25%) the crop cycle; narrow row spacing (19%); and cultivars with greater competitive ability (18%). Less than 15% of the people surveyed used increased crop densities or altered date of sowing. There is a high dependence on chemical control in the main crops grown in Argentina. Extension efforts are needed to emphasize the importance of integrated weed management.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Julio Alejandro Scursoni, Email:


Hide All
Baastians, L, Paolini, R, Baumann, DT (2008) Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption? Weed Res 48:481491
Blackshaw, RE, Beckie, HJ, Molnar, LJ, Entz, T, Moyer, JR (2005) Combining agronomic practices and herbicides improves weed management in wheat– canola rotations within zero-tillage production systems. Weed Sci 53: 528535
Buhler, DD (1999) Expanding the context of weed management. J Crop Prod 2:17
[CASAFE] Cámara de Sanidad Agropecuaria y Fertilizantes (2015) Homepage. Accessed: December 2017
de la Fuente, EB, Suarez, SA, Ghersa, CM (2006) Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agric Ecosyst Environ 115: 229236
Delucchi, J, Nisensohn, L, Tuesca, D (2005) International Survey of Herbicide Resistance. Accessed: December 2017
Doré, T, Makowski, D, Malézieuxc, E, Munier-Jolaind, N, Tchamitchiane, M, Tittonell, P (2011) Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. Europ J Agron 34: 197210
Faccini, D, Puricelli, E (2007) Efficacy of herbicide, dose and plant stage on weeds present in fallow. Agriscientia XXIV(1): 2935
Froud-Williams, RJ (1988) Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. Pages 213236 in: Altieri, MA, Liebman, M, eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Heap, IM (2018) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Accessed: April 2018.
Heap, IM, Duke, S (2018) Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Manag Sci 74: 10401049
[ISAAA] International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (2017) GM Approval Database. Accessed: December 2017
Kruk, BC (2015) Disminución de la emergencia de malezas en diferentes escenarios agrícolas bajo siembra directa [Decrease in the emergence of weeds in different agricultural scenarios under direct seeding]. Agron Ambiente 35: 179190
Metzler, M (2014) Manejo y control de rama negra [Management and control of Conyza sp.]. Newsletter No. 22 Julio. Manejo Integrado De Malezas.pdf. Accessed: November 2017
Muñoz, MS, Morello, JP, Scursoni, JA (2018) Respuesta a herbicidas inhibidores de ACCasa (haloxifop metil y cletodim) e inhibidores de EPSPS (glifosato) en Sorghum halepense en Argentina en los ciclos agrícolas 2016/17 y 2017/18 [Response to ACCase inhibitor (halofyfop-methyl and clethodim) and EPSPS inhibitor (glyphosate) herbicides in Sorghum halepenese in Argentina in the agricultural cycles 2016/17 and 2017/18]. II. Congreso Argentino de Malezas; June 5–6, 2015; Rosario, Argentina. 94 p.
Muñoz, MS, Scursoni, JA (2015) Demografía de dos poblaciones de Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. con baja sensibilidad a glifosato [Population demographics of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. with low sensitivity to glyphosate]. Actas XX Congreso Latinoamericano de Malezas, I. Congreso Argentino de Malezas; September 9–10, 2015; Buenos Aires, Argentina. Pp 141144.
Myers, JP, Antoniou, MN, Blumberg, B, Carroll, L, Colborn, T, Everett, LG, Hansen, M, Landrigan, PG, Lanphear, BP, Mesnage, R, Vandenberg, LN, vom Saal, FS, Welshons, WV, Benbrook, CM (2016) Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environmental Health 15: 19
Norsworthy, JK, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Crop weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol 27: 623630
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci. 60(SP1): 3162
Oerke, EC (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:3143
Puricelli, E, Orioli, G, Sabbatini, MR (2002) Demography of Anoda cristata in wide- and narrow-row soybean. Weed Res 42:456463
Qaim, M, Traxler, G. (2005) Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agric Econ 32: 7386
[ReTAA] Relevamiento de Tecnología Agrícola Aplicada de la Bolsa de Cereales (2017) Accessed: November 2017
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO, Eubank, TW, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013a) Adoption of best management practices for herbicide-resistant weeds in midsouthern United States cotton, rice, and soybean. Weed Technol 27: 788797
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO IV, Eubank, TW, Scott, RC (2013b) Assessment of weed management practices and problem weeds in the midsouth United States soybean: a consultant’s perspective. Weed Technol 27: 612622
Satorre, E, Kruk, B (2016) Interacciones cultivo-malezas: competencia [Crop-weed interactions: Competition]. Pages 141178 in Satorre, E, Kruk, B, de la Fuente, E, eds. Bases y herramientas para el manejo de malezas [Foundations and tools for weed management]. Capítulo 5. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Facultad de Agronomía, UBA
Scursoni, J, Satorre, EH (2005) Barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wild oat (Avena fatua) competition is affected by crop and weed density. Weed Technol 19:790795
Scursoni, J, Satorre, EH (2010) Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina. Crop Prot 29:957962
Scursoni, J, Vila Aiub, M (2016) Resistencia de las malezas a los herbicidas [Weed resistance to herbicides]. Pages 246277 in Satorre, E, Kruk, B, de la Fuente, E. eds. Bases y herramientas para el manejo de malezas [Foundations and tools for weed management]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Facultad de Agronomía, UBA
SubSecretaría de Agroindustria. (2017) Datos Agroindustriales. Accessed: November 2017
Tuesca, D, Puricelli, E (2007) Effect of tillage systems and herbicide treatments on weed abundance and diversity in a glyphosate resistant crop rotation. Crop Prot 26:17651770
Tilman, D, Cassman, KG, Matson, PA, Naylor, R, Polasky, S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418: 671677
Uttley, NL (2009) Agrochemical proprietary off-patent products-what are they? Outlooks on Pest Management 20: 8588
Vigna, M, Papa, J, Ponsa, J, Bedmar, F, Guevara, G, Rainero, H, Olea, I, Gigón, R, Isitilart, C, López, R, Arguissain, G, Picapietra, G (2014) El control químico de malezas en cultivos extensivos [Chemical control of weeds in extensive farming]. In Fernandez, O, Leguizamón, E, Acciaresi, H, eds. Malezas e Invasoras de la Argentina. Tomo I: Ecología y Manejo [Weeds and invasive species of Argentina. Volume I: Ecology and management]. Editorial UNS, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
Zhang, WJ, Jiang, FB, Ou, JF (2011) Global pesticide consumption and pollution: with China as a focus. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci 1: 125144


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Weed management practices in Argentina crops

  • Julio Alejandro Scursoni (a1), Alejandra Carolina Duarte Vera (a2), Fernando Hugo Oreja (a3), Betina Claudia Kruk (a4) and Elba Beatriz de la Fuente (a5)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.