Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Weed control by 2,4-D dimethylamine depends on mixture water hardness and adjuvant inclusion but not spray solution storage time

  • Geoffrey P. Schortgen (a1) and Aaron J. Patton (a2)

Abstract

Herbicides are an important tool in managing weeds in turf and agricultural production. One of the earliest selective herbicides, 2,4-D, is a weak acid herbicide used to control broadleaf weeds. Water-quality parameters, such as pH and hardness, influence the efficacy of weak acid herbicides. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate how varying water hardness level, spray solution storage time, and adjuvant inclusion affected broadleaf weed control by 2,4-D dimethylamine. The first experiment evaluated a range of water-hardness levels (from 0 to 600 mg calcium carbonate [CaCO3] L−1) on efficacy of 2,4-D dimethylamine applied at 1.60 kg ae ha−1 for dandelion and horseweed control. A second experiment evaluated dandelion control from spray solutions prepared 0, 1, 4, 24, and 72 h before application. Dandelion and horseweed control by 2,4-D dimethylamine was reduced when the CaCO3 level in water was at least 422 or at least 390 mg L−1, respectively. Hard-water antagonism was overcome by the addition of 20 g L−1 ammonium sulfate (AMS) into the mixture. When AMS was included in spray mixtures, no differences were observed at 600 mg CaCO3 L−1, compared with distilled water. Spray solution storage time did not influence dandelion control, regardless of water-hardness level or adjuvant inclusion. To prevent antagonism, applicators should use a water-conditioning agent such as AMS when applying 2,4-D dimethylamine in hard water.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Aaron J. Patton, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: ajpatton@purdue.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

Associate Editor: Scott McElroy, Auburn University

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Anonymous (2009) Buttress® selective herbicide product label. Nufarm Australia Limited Publication No. 46043/0407. Loverton North, Victoria, Australia: Nufarm. 8 p
Anonymous (2004) Roundup® Original herbicide product label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Company. 21 p
Beck, LL, Patton, AJ (2015) Weed garden: an effective tool for extension education. J Extension 53(4):Article 4TOT8. http://www.joe.org/joe/2015august/tt8.php. Accessed: January 17, 2019
Bekbölet, M, Yenigün, O, Yücel, I (1999) Sorption studies of 2,4-D on selected soils. Water, Air Soil Poll 111:7588
Boyd, CE (2015) Water Quality: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Auburn, AL: Springer. 357 p
Costa, J, Appleby, AP (1986) Effects of ammonium sulphate on leaf growth inhibition by glyphosate in Cyperus esuclentus L. Crop Prot 5:314318
Devkota, P, Johnson, WG (2016) Effect of carrier water hardness and ammonium sulfate on efficacy of 2,4-D choline and premixed 2,4-D choline plus glyphosate. Weed Technol 30:878887
Devkota, P, Whitford, F, Johnson, WG (2016) Influence of spray-solution temperature and holding duration on weed control with premixed glyphosate and dicamba formulation. Weed Technol 30:116122
Etō, M (1974) Organophosphorus Pesticides: Organic and Biological Chemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. P. 57
Hem, JD (1985) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. 3rd edn. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution and Prevention. Water-Supply Paper 2254. Pp 6364
[IDNR] Indiana Department of Natural Resources (1999) Ambient ground water chemistry. https://www.in.gov/dnr/water/5246.htm. Accessed: January 18, 2019
Kelly, JA (1953) Commercial herbicides, present methods of formulation. Agric Food Chem 1:254256
Klein, DR (2012) Organic Chemistry. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Pp 94135
Kuhr, RJ, Dorough, HW (1976) Carbamate Insecticides: Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Toxicology. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press. Pp 1920
Mahoney, KJ, Nurse, RE, Sikkema, PH (2014) The effect of hard water, spray solution storage time, and ammonium sulfate on glyphosate efficacy and yield of glyphosate-resistant corn. Can J Plant Sci 94:14011405
McMullan, PM (2000) Utility adjuvants. Weed Technol 14:792797
Nalewaja, JD, Matysiak, R (1991) Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci 39:622628
Nalewaja, JD, Matysiak, R (1993) Spray carrier salts affect herbicide toxicity to kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol 7:154158
Nalewaja, JD, Woznica, Z, Manthey, FA (1990) Sodium bicarbonate antagonism of 2,4-D amine. Weed Technol 4:588591
Patton, AJ, Weisenberger, DV, Johnson, WG (2016) Divalent cations in spray water influence 2,4-D efficacy on dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and broadleaf plantain (Plantago major). Weed Technol 30:431440
Patton, AJ, Weisenberger, DV, Schortgen, GP (2018) 2,4-D resistant buckhorn plantain (Plantago lanceolata) in managed turf. Weed Technol 32:182189
Peterson, GE (1967) The discovery and development of 2,4-D. Agr Hist 41:243254
Peterson, MA, McMaster, SA, Riechers, DE, Kelston, J, Shalman, PW (2016) 2,4-D past, present, and future: a review. Weed Technol 30:303345
Roskamp, JM, Chahal, GS, Johnson, WG (2013) The effect of cations and ammonium sulfate on the efficacy of dicamba and 2,4-D. Weed Technol 27:7277
Ross, MR, Lembi, CA (1999) Applied weed science. 2nd edn. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue: University. Pp 8486
Schneider, CA, Rasband, WS, Eliceiri, KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671675
Senseman, SA, ed (2007) Herbicide Handbook. 9th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 458 p
Shea, PJ, Tupy, DR (1984) Reversal of cation-induced reduction in glyphosate activity with EDTA. Weed Sci 32:802806
Stewart, CL, Nurse, RE, Cowbrough, M, Sikkema, PH. 2009. How long can a herbicide remain in the spray tank without losing efficacy? Crop Prot 28:10861090
Tan, S, Crabtree, GD (1994) Cuticular penetration of 2,4-D as affected by interaction between diethylene glycol monooleate surfactant and apple leaf cuticles. Pestic Sci 41:3539
Tharp, C, Sigler, A (2013) Pesticide performance and water quality. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University Extension, MT201305AG. 4 p
Thelen, KD, Jackson, EP, Penner, D (1995) The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci 43:541548
[USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) 2,4-D RED Facts. https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/html/24d_fs.html. Accessed: August 31, 2015
[USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Pesticide industry sales and usage: 2006 and 2007 market estimates.33 p. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/market_estimates2007.pdf. Accessed: January 13, 2019
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2015 Baseline survey of the most common and troublesome weeds in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2015-Weed-Survey_Baseline.xlsx. Accessed: January 17, 2019
Vlek, PLG, Craswell, ET (1981) Ammonia volatilization from flooded soils. Fertil Res 2:227245
Whitford, F, Penner, D, Johnson, B, Bledsoe, L, Wagoner, N, Garr, J, Wise, K, Obermeyer, J, Blessing, A (2009) The impact of water quality on pesticide performance. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, PPP-86. 38 p
Zollinger, RK, Nalewaja, JD, Peterson, DE, Young, BG (2010) Effect of hard water and ammonium sulfate on weak acid herbicide activity. JASTM Int 7:110

Keywords

Weed control by 2,4-D dimethylamine depends on mixture water hardness and adjuvant inclusion but not spray solution storage time

  • Geoffrey P. Schortgen (a1) and Aaron J. Patton (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed