Skip to main content Accessibility help

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) Tolerance to Clomazone

  • Edward P. Richard (a1)


Field studies were conducted over four years to determine sugarcane response to clomazone applied POST at 1.1 and 2.2 kg ai/ha. Sugarcane leaves present when clomazone was applied were chlorotic 2 WAT. Injury 4 WAT ranged from 0 to 38% following single applications in March and April. Chlorosis 4 wk after the May application of a March plus May sequential treatment was only greater than for the single March application in 1992. The number of harvestable sugarcane stalks following treatments with clomazone was intermediate between those produced with standard applications of either metribuzin at 2.6 kg ai/ha (least injurious) or terbacil as a single treatment at 1.8 kg ai/ha in March and April or as a 1.8 plus 0.9 kg/ha March plus May sequential treatment. Sugar recovery as an average of all herbicide treatments was lower for the sequential applications than for the single applications. Averaged over single and sequential treatments, theoretically recoverable sugar levels with clomazone at both rates was intermediate between the recoveries obtained with standard applications of metribuzin (highest) and terbacil. Gross cane and sugar yields following all applications of clomazone at 1.1 kg/ha and following single applications of clomazone at 2.2 kg/ha in March and April were similar to the metribuzin standard. Sugar yields following the sequential treatment of clomazone at 2.2 kg/ha, although lower than the metribuzin standard, were similar to the standard terbacil sequential treatment.



Hide All
1. Anonymous. 1994. Controlling weeds in sugarcane. Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Louisiana Coop. Ext. Serv. Pub. 2314(5M), 15 p.
2. Chen, J. C. P. and Chou, C. 1993. Cane Sugar Handbook, 12th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p. 852867.
3. Duke, S. O., Kenyon, W. H., and Paul, R. N. 1985. FMC 57020 effects on chloroplast development in pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) cotyledons. Weed Sci. 33:786794.
4. Griffin, J. L. and Lencse, R. J. 1992. Preemergence control of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) in sugarcane. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 12:6570.
5. Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Clomazone as a component in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicide programs. Weed Technol. 7:202211.
6. Jordan, D. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Former, L. D. 1994. Utility of clomazone for annual grass and broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 8:2327.
7. Legendre, B. L. and Henderson, M. T. 1972. The history and development of sugar yield calculations. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 2:1018.
8. Richard, E. P. Jr., 1989. Response of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) cultivars to preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:358363.
9. Richard, E. P. Jr. 1990. Timing effects on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with asulam in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Weed Technol. 4:8186.
10. Richard, E. P. Jr. 1996. Efforts to control bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) in sugarcane in Louisiana. Proc. Inter. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. (in press).
11. Richard, E. P. Jr. and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in sugarcane with selected preemergence and postemergence herbicides. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 13:6072.
12. Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:629635.
13. Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678685.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed