Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Sensitivity of Triploid Hybrid Bermudagrass Cultivars and Common Bermudagrass to Postemergence Herbicides

  • Theodore M. Webster (a1), Craig W. Bednarz (a1) and Wayne W. Hanna (a1)

Abstract

The potential weediness of hybrid bermudagrass cultivars in nontarget areas is an important factor when considering the development of herbicide-resistant cultivars. Field studies evaluated the response of common bermudagrass, hexaploid hybrid ‘Tifton-10’, and two triploid hybrid bermudagrass cultivars (‘TifEagle’ and ‘TifSport’) to clethodim, fluazifop-p, glufosinate, glyphosate, and quizalofop-p. Glyphosate was more consistent than clethodim and clethodim plus glyphosate in controlling common bermudagrass. The triploid cultivars were equally sensitive to each of these treatments, whereas Tifton-10 control was highest with treatments that included glyphosate. Variability between years in control of common bermudagrass was attributed to differences in plant size at application, with greater control of smaller plants. All herbicides reduced common bermudagrass plant diameters ≥ 93% in 1999 when grown without a crop. However, in 2001, only herbicide treatments that included two applications of 1.1 kg ai/ha glyphosate reduced plant diameters 6 to 59%. None of the other treatments reduced common bermudagrass plant diameters compared with pretreatment values. When grown with cotton, fluazifop-p and 4.5 kg/ha glyphosate were the only treatments consistent across cultivars and years. All herbicide treatments reduced triploid hybrid bermudagrass plant diameters ≥ 90%, whereas Tifton-10 plant diameters were reduced > 86% by all treatments, with the exception of clethodim. As in the non-cropland study, common bermudagrass plant diameters were reduced ≥ 97% by herbicides in 1999, whereas in 2001, only fluazifop-p and glyphosate treatments reduced plant diameters compared with the nontreated control. Both the lack of aggressiveness and susceptibility to common herbicides of the triploid hybrid cultivars relative to common bermudagrass indicates that these non–pollen-producing or -receiving cultivars are reasonable candidates for the introduction of herbicide resistance.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: twebster@tifton.usda.gov

References

Hide All
Bedmar, F. 1992. Evaluation on postemergence grass herbicides against Cynodon dactylon in sunflower. Ann. Appl. Biol. 120:5859.
Bedmar, F. 1997. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control in sunflower (Helianthus annuus), soybean (Glycine max), and potato (Solanum tuberosum) with postemergence graminicides. Weed Technol. 11:683688.
Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Bridges, D. C. 1987. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) ecotype response to herbicides. Weed Technol. 1:221225.
Brown, S. M., Whitwell, T., and Street, J. E. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33:503506.
Bryson, C. T. and Wills, G. D. 1985. Susceptibility of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) biotypes to several herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:848852.
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states—broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:299313.
Dowler, C. C. 1999. Weed survey—southern states: horticultural, pasture, recreational, and industrial subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:280318.
Gressel, J. 1999. Tandem constructs: preventing the rise of superweeds. Trends Biotechnol. 17:361366.
Grichar, W. J. 1995. Comparison of postemergence herbicides for common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 9:825828.
Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1989. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control with postemergence herbicides in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 3:267271.
Hanna, W. W. 1997. Tift 94’ bermudagrass. U.S. plant patent 10,079. October 21, 1997.
Hanna, W. W. 1999. Bermudagrass named ‘TifEagle. U.S. plant patent 11,163. December 21, 1999.
Hanna, W. W., Burton, G. W., and Johnson, A. W. 1990. Registration of ‘Tifton 10’ turf bermudagrass. Crop Sci. 30:13551356.
Hanna, W. W., Carrow, R. N., and Powell, A. J. 1997. Registration of ‘Tift 94’ bermudagrass. Crop Sci. 37:1012.
Hanna, W. W. and Elsner, J. E. 1999. Registration of ‘TifEagle’ bermudagrass. Crop Sci. 39:1258.
Kind, M. 2000. Turf talk: transgenic turf? Not yet. Golf Course Manage. February: 48.
Mitich, L. W. 1989. Intriguing world of weeds: bermudagrass. Weed Technol. 3:433435.
Rochecouste, E. 1962a. Studies on the biotypes of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. I. Botanical investigations. Weed Res. 2:123.
Rochecouste, E. 1962b. Studies on the biotypes of Cynodon dactyon (L.) Pers. II. Growth response to trichloroacetic and 2,2-dichloropropionic acids. Weed Res. 2:136145.
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states: grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:247274.
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11:308317.
Webster, T. M. and MacDonald, G. E. 2001. A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol. 15:771790.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed