Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:28:13.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of ‘TifEagle’ Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon × Cynodon transvaalensis) to Ethephon and Trinexapac-ethyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patrick E. McCullough
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, D-136 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0319
Lambert B. McCarty*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, D-136 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0319
Haibo Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, D-136 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0319
Ted Whitwell
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, D-136 Poole Agriculture Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0319
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: bmccrty@clemson.edu

Abstract

Turf managers combine ethephon with trinexapac-ethyl (TE) on bentgrass greens to suppress annual bluegrass, inhibit turf growth, and enhance turf quality; however, effects of this growth regulator combination have not been reported on bermudagrass greens. Two experiments were conducted at the Clemson University Greenhouse Complex to investigate the response of ‘TifEagle’ bermudagrass to ethephon and TE. TifEagle bermudagrass plugs were placed in pots with 23-cm depths, 324-cm2 total surface areas, and a soil medium of an 85:15 (v/v) sand and peat moss mix. Ethephon was applied at 0, 3.8 (EP1), and 7.6 (EP2) kg ai/ha/3 wk with TE at 0 and 0.04 kg ai/ha/ 3 wk over a 9-wk period. Initial responses of bermudagrass to ethephon included chlorotic leaves and severe thinning. Bermudagrass treated with ethephon had quality reduced as much as 33% from nontreated turf. TE enhanced turf quality 4 to 22% from 4 to 9 wk after initial treatment. TE helped mask ethephon-induced quality decline after the third application. In the presence of TE, bermudagrass clipping yield was reduced from nontreated turf by 57, 70, and 72% when ethephon was applied at 0, 3.8, and 7.6 kg/ha/3 wk. Ethephon linearly reduced root mass after 9 wk from nontreated turf by 20 and 33% at 3.8 and 7.6 kg/ha/3 wk, respectively. Compared with respective ethephon rates alone, bermudagrass treated with TE and ethephon at 0, 3.8, and 7.6 kg/ha/3 wk, averaged 28, 8, and 15% more root mass. Ethephon at 3.8 and 7.6 kg/ha/3 wk without TE reduced TifEagle bermudagrass root length 14 and 16%, respectively, compared with untreated turf. Bermudagrass treated with ethephon at 0, 3.8, and 7.6 kg/ha/3 wk with TE averaged 3, 11, and 17% higher root length compared with respective ethephon rates after 9 wk. Overall, ethephon may have negative effects on TifEagle root mass, root length, and turf quality. However, combining ethephon with TE may help reduce these deleterious effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Publication 5052 Clemson University Experimental Research Station.

References

Literature Cited

Beard, J. B. 2002. Turf Management for Golf Courses. 2nd ed. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press. Pp. 447485.Google Scholar
Bunnell, B. T. 2003. Physiological Response of Hybrid Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy) to Reduced Light Environments. Ph.D. dissertation. Clemson University, Clemson, SC. Pp. 3357.Google Scholar
Fagerness, M. J. and Yelverton, F. H. 2000. Tissue production and quality of Tifway bermudagrass as affected by seasonal application patterns of trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Sci. 40:493497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelertner, W. and Stowell, L. J. 2001. Advances in Poa seedhead management. Golf Course Management 69 (10):4953.Google Scholar
Kane, R. and Miller, L. 2003. Field testing plant growth regulators and wetting agents for annual bluegrass seedhead suppression. USGA Green Section Record 41 (7):2126.Google Scholar
McCarty, L. B. and Miller, G. L. 2002. Managing Bermudagrass Turf: Selection, Construction, Cultural Practices and Pest Management Strategies. Chelsea, MI: Sleeping Bear. 135 p.Google Scholar
McCullough, P., Liu, H., and McCarty, B. 2004. Ultradwarf bermudagrass: how sensitive is it to PGRs? Turfgrass Trends 13 (2):6976.Google Scholar
McCullough, P. E. 2004. Physiological Response of ‘TifEagle’ Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy) to Nitrogen and Trinexapac-ethyl. M.S. thesis. Clemson University, Clemson, SC. Pp. 34127.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. R., McCarty, B., and Yelverton, F. H. 2005. Turfgrass plant growth regulators. in McCarty, L. B., ed. Best Golf Course Management Practices, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pp. 705714.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. D. 2002. Turf quality and freezing tolerance of Tifway bermudagrass as affected by late-season nitrogen and trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Sci. 42:162166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatters, R. G., Wheeler, R., and West, S. H. 1998. Ethephon induced changes in vegetative growth of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass. Crop Sci. 38:97103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. 2002. Plant Physiology, 3rd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Pp. 524532.Google Scholar
Watschke, T. L., Prinster, M. G., and Brenninger, J. M. 1992. Plant growth regulators and turfgrass management. in Waddington, D. V., Carrow, R. N., and Shearman, R. C., eds. Agronomy Monograph No. 32. Turfgrass. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. Pp. 557588.Google Scholar