Skip to main content Accessibility help

On the Significance of Field Studies in Allelopathy

  • Manjit Kaur (a1) and C. L. Foy (a2)


Allelopathy has been suggested as a mechanism of interference in several weed species. Allelochemicals released from certain weed species influence the growth and yield of crop species. Several laboratory studies present circumstantial evidence of the occurrence of allelopathy as a causative agent in weed–crop agroecosystems. Field evidence, however, is still lacking. In this paper, the significance of field studies is argued in terms of a multifaceted approach to allelopathy, and mugwort is used as an example. Previous research demonstrated the allelopathic potential of mugwort; however, experiments were not carried out in a natural environment. Inderjit and Foy (1999) have demonstrated that chemical characteristics (pH, inorganic ions, and phenolics) of soil amended with mugwort leaf leachate were altered when compared to unamended soil. We have analyzed the mugwort-infested field soil and compared its chemical characteristics with those of amended soils. No definite trend, in terms of influence of mugwort on soil chemistry, was observed. Results indicate the importance of field studies in order to obtain ecologically relevant data from laboratory studies. Field situations are often complex in terms of the presence of interfering flora. Cyanobacteria, for example, play an important role in weed–crop interactions in rice paddy soils. Allelochemicals released from weed species present in the paddy field may influence nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in addition to their phytotoxic effects to the paddy crop. Significance of phytotoxic effects of weed species on crop growth, and N2-fixing potential of cyanobacteria in paddy soils is discussed.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail:


Hide All
Blum, U. 1999. Designing laboratory plant debris-soil bioassays: some reflections. In Inderjit, K.M.M. Dakshini, and Foy, C. L., eds. Principles and Practices in Plant Ecology: Allelochemical Interactions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 1723.
Blum, U., Gerig, T. M., Worsham, A. D., and King, L. D. 1993. Modification of allelopathic effects of p-coumaric acid on morningglory seedling biomass by glucose, methionine, and nitrate. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 27912811.
Brady, N. C. 1996. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 10th ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India. 621 p.
Broadbent, F. E. and Tyler, K. B. 1962. Laboratory and greenhouse investigations of nitrogen mobilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27: 459462.
Cheremisinoff, P. N. and Ellerbusch, F. 1978. Carbon Adsorption Handbook. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers. 1063 p.
Eviner, V. T. and Chapin, F. S. III. 1997. Plant-microbial interactions. Nature 385: 2627.
Gleason, F. K. and Case, D. E. 1986. Activity of the natural algicide, cyanobacterin, on angiosperm. Plant Physiol. 80: 834837.
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press. 892 p.
Holm, L., Doll, J., Holm, E., Pancho, J., and Herberger, J. 1997. World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. New York: J. Wiley. 1129 p.
Inderjit, . 1998. Influence of Pluchea lanceolata (Asteraceae) on selected soil properties. Am. J. Bot. 85: 6469.
Inderjit, and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1994a. Allelopathic potential of phenolics from the roots of Pluchea lanceolata . Physiol. Plant. 92: 571576.
Inderjit, and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1994b. Allelopathic effects on Pluchea lanceolata (Asteraceae) on characteristics of four soils and growth of mustard and tomato. Am. J. Bot. 81: 799804.
Inderjit, and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1994c. Algal allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 60: 182196.
Inderjit, and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1997. Effects of cyanobacterial inoculum on soil characteristics and cereal growth. Can. J. Bot. 75: 12671272.
Inderjit, and Del Moral, R. 1997. Is separating resource competition from allelopathy realistic? Bot. Rev. 63: 221230.
Inderjit, and Foy, C. L. 1999. Nature of the interference mechanism of mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris). Weed Technol. 13: 176182.
Inderjit, and Keating, K. I. 1999. Allelopathy: principles, procedures, processes, and promises for biological control. Adv. Agron. 67: 141231.
Inderjit, and Weston, L. A. 2000. Are laboratory bioassays for allelopathy suitable for prediction of field responses? J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 21112118.
Inderjit, C. L. Foy, and Dakshini, K.M.M. 1998. Pluchea Lanceolata: a noxious perennial weed. Weed Technol. 12: 190193.
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S. III, and Pons, T. L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 540 p.
McCarty, G. W. and Bremner, J. M. 1986. Effects of phenolic compounds on nitrification in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50: 920923.
Michelsen, A., Schmidt, I. K., Jonasson, S., Dighton, J., Jones, H. E., and Callaghan, T. V. 1995. Inhibition of growth, and effects on nutrient uptake of arctic graminoids by leaf extracts—allelopathy or resource competition between plant and microbes? Oecologia 103: 407418.
Olofsdotter, M., ed. 1998. Allelopathy in Rice. Manila: International Rice Research Institute. 154 p.
Patterson, D. T. 1986. Allelopathy. In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science, Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 111134.
Putnam, A. R. 1985. Weed allelopathy. In Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume 1: Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 131155.
Rice, E. L. 1984. Allelopathy. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 422 p.
Rice, E. L. and Pancholy, S. K. 1973. Inhibition of nitrification by climax ecosystems. II. Additional evidence and possible role of tannins. Am. J. Bot. 60: 691702.
Rice, E. L. and Pancholy, S. K. 1974. Inhibition of nitrification by climax ecosystems. III. Inhibitors other than tannins. Am. J. Bot. 61: 10951103.
Stark, J. M. and Hart, S. C. 1997. High rates of nitrification and nitrate turnover in undisturbed coniferous forests. Nature 385: 6164.
Wardle, D. A. and Nilsson, M.-C. 1997. Microbe-plant competition, allelopathy in arctic plants. Oecologia 109: 291293.
Wardle, D. A., Nilsson, M. C., Gallet, C., and Zackrisson, O. 1998. An ecosystem level perspective of allelopathy. Biol. Rev. 73: 305319.
Wu, H., Pratley, T., Lemerle, D., and Haig, T. 1999. Crop cultivars with allelopathic activity. Weed Res. 39: 171180.


On the Significance of Field Studies in Allelopathy

  • Manjit Kaur (a1) and C. L. Foy (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed