Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:06:39.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MSMA Antagonizes Glyphosate and Glufosinate Efficacy on Broadleaf and Grass Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Clifford H. Koger ,
Ian C. Burke ,
Donnie K. Miller ,
J. Andrew Kendig ,
Krishna N. Reddy  and
John W. Wilcut
Clifford H. Koger*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit and Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, PO Box 345, Stoneville, MS 38776
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
Donnie K. Miller
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
J. Andrew Kendig
Affiliation:
Delta Research Center, University of Missouri, P.O. Box 160, Portageville, MO 63873
Krishna N. Reddy
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: tkoger@drec.msstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the compatibility of MSMA in a tank mixture with glyphosate or glufosinate for broadleaf and grass weed control. Glyphosate, glufosinate, and MSMA were evaluated at 0.5×, 1×, and 2× rates, with 1× rates of 0.84 kgae/ha, 0.5 kgai/ha, and 2.2 kgai/ha, respectively. Glyphosate and glufosinate provided similar levels of control for most weed species and were often more efficacious than MSMA alone. Glyphosate controlled Palmer amaranth better than glufosinate. Glufosinate controlled hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and ivyleaf morningglory better than glyphosate at one location. Weed control was not improved with the addition of MSMA to glyphosate or glufosinate when compared with either herbicide alone. MSMA antagonized glyphosate efficacy on barnyardgrass, browntop millet, hemp sesbania, Palmer amaranth, and redroot pigweed. MSMA antagonized glufosinate efficacy on browntop millet, hemp sesbania, ivyleaf morningglory, johnsongrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, redroot pigweed, and velvetleaf. Antagonism of glyphosate or glufosinate by MSMA was often overcome by applying the 2× rate of either herbicide alone. MSMA is not a compatible tank-mixture partner with glyphosate or glufosinate for weed control in cotton.

Keywords

GlyphosateglufosinateMSMAcommon barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv. ECHCGbrowntop millet, Brachiaria ramosa (L.) Stapf PANRAhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill SEBEXivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHEjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. SORHApalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPApitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. SIDSPredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. ABUTHcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Herbicide interactionspesticide interactionssynergismtank mixturesglufosinate-resistant cottonglyphosate-resistant cotton
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 159 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Askew, S. D., Bailey, W. A., Scott, G. H., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Economic assessment of weed management for transgenic and nontransgenic cotton in tilled and nontilled systems. Weed Sci. 50:512–520.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Shaw, D. R., and Arnold, J. C. 1997. Weed control in Liberty-Link soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:59.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13:308–313.Google Scholar
Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:394–398.Google Scholar
Bayer, , 2007. Cotton: Bayercropscienceus.com. http://www.bayercropscienceus.com. Accessed: February 1, 2007.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C. and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Weed Management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and pyrithiobac. Weed Technol. 18:268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 5:270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CDMS] Crop Data Management Systems 2007. CDMS. http://www.cdms.net/manuf/manuf.asp. Accessed: February 1, 2007.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic response of herbicide combinations. Weeds. 15:20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Askew, S. D., Thomas, W. E., and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol. 18:443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croon, K. A., Ketchersid, M. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1989. Effect of bentazon, imazaquin, and chlorimuron on the absorption and translocation of the methyl ester of haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 37:645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Corbin, F. T., and Sheldon, Y. 1999. Influence of adjuvants and bromoxynil on absorption of clethodim. Weed Technol. 13:536–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Webster, T. M., York, A. C., Barrentine, R. M., and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2004. Glyphosate/MSMA mixtures in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J. Cotton Sci. 8:124–129.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. 1992. Modes of action of herbicides used in cotton. in McWhorter, C.G., Abernathy, J.L., eds. Weeds of Cotton. Memphis, TN The Cotton Foundation. 403–437.Google Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., Monks, C. D., and Goodman, W. R. 2001. Weed management programs for glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 15:544–551.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. in Camper, N.D., eds. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL Southern Weed Science Society. 37–38.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D. S. and York, A. C. 1989. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield following fluometuron postemergence applied. Weed Technol. 3:501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, T. V., Wehtje, G. R., and Grey, T. L. 1998. The interaction of pyridate and 2,4-DB in peanut (Arachis hypogaea), Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 46:284–288.Google Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1995. Non-selective and selective combinations in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Bradley, P. R., Hart, S. E., Buesinger, M. L., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. A., Chandler, J. M., Morrision, J. E. Jr, Senseman, S. A., and Tingle, C. H. 2001. Glufosinate combinations and row spacing weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:141–147.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Price, A. J., and Reddy, K. N. 2005. Weed control and cotton response to combinations of glyphosate and trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technol. 19:113–121.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Poston, D. H., and Reddy, K. N. 2004. Effect of glyphosate spray coverage on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa). Weed Technol. 18:124–130.Google Scholar
Mersey, B. G., Hall, J. C., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidal activity of glufosinate-ammonium: absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:90–98.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Patterson, M. G., Wilcut, J. W., and Delaney, D. P. 1999. Effect of pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and weed control. Weed Technol. 13:6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsanto, , 2007. Monsanto Imagine. http://www.monsanto.com. Accessed: February 1, 2007.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2005. Acreage. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bba/acrg0605.pdf. Accessed: October 19, 2005.Google Scholar
Norris, J. L., Shaw, D. R., and Snipes, C. E. 2002. Influence of row spacing and residual herbicides on weed control in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Burgos, N. R., and Oliver, L. R. 2001. Differences in weed tolerance to glyphosate involve different mechanisms. Weed Technol. 15:725–731.Google Scholar
Olson, W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1982. Effect of MCPA on 14C-diclofop uptake translocation. Weed Sci. 30:59–63.Google Scholar
Owen, M. D. K. and Zelaya, I. A. 2005. Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 61:301–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, W. and Crabtree, G. 1986. Absorption, translocation, and toxicity of glyphosate and oxyfluorfen in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34:923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wu, J., and Hatzios, K. K. 1999. Effects of temperature and chemical additives on the response of transgenic herbicide resistant soybeans to glufosinate and glyphosate applications. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 65:119–131.Google Scholar
Pline-Srnic, W. A., Edmisten, K. L., Wilcut, J. W., Wells, R., and Thomas, J. L. 2004. Effect of glyphosate on fruit retention, yield, and fiber quality of glyphosate resistant cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 8:24–32.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2002. Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton. Weed Sci. 50:642–647.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Whiting, K. 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol. 14:204–211.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) with asulam applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:657–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 2001. SAS User's Guide. Release 8.2 Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Arnold, J. C. 2002. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 16:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. L. and Branson, J. W. 2000. Effectiveness of soil residual herbicides in Roundup Ready (glyphosate-tolerant) cotton programs. in. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN National Cotton Council of America. 1470–1471.Google Scholar
Smith, N., Shurley, D., Givan, B., and Lasey, C. 2003. Cotton enterprise cost analysis. in. Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis South Georgia. Tifton, GA University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Publication AGECON-94-010. 3–10.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1992. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) yield response to mechanical and chemical weed control systems. Weed Sci. 40:249–254.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E., Colvin, D. L., Patterson, M. G., and Crawford, S. H. 1992. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) yield response cultivation timing and frequency. Weed Technol. 6:31–35.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Rapid inactivation of glyphosate in the soil. Weed Sci. 23:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46:652–660.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997b. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species. Weed Sci. 45:378–381.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Phillips, W. H. 1997a. Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol. 11:484–488.Google Scholar
Tebbe, C. C. and Reber, H. H. 1991. Degradation of (C14) phosphinothricin (glufosinate) in soil under laboratory conditions: effects of concentration and soil amendments on 14CO2 production. Biol. Fertil. Soils 11:62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 2002. Residual herbicides used in combination with glyphosate and glufosinate in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wychen, L. R., Harvey, G. H., Van Gessel, M. J., Rabey, T. L., and Bach, D. J. 1999. Efficacy and crop response of glufosinate-based weed management in PAT-transformed sweet corn. Weed Technol. 13:104–111.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. and Walker, R. H. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate and 2,4-DB for the control of selected morningglory (Ipomoea spp) species. Weed Technol. 11:152–156.Google Scholar
Wendler, C., Barniske, M., and Wild, A. 1990. Effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis and photorespiration of C3 and C4 plants. Photosynth. Res. 24:55–61.Google Scholar
Woodburn, A. T. 2000. Glyphosate: production, pricing, and use worldwide. Pest. Manag. Sci. 56:309–312.Google Scholar