Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Managing Cool-Season Weeds in Sugarbeet Grown for Biofuel in the Southeastern United States

  • W. Carroll Johnson (a1), Theodore M. Webster (a2), Timothy L. Grey (a3) and Xuelin Luo (a4)

Abstract

Sugarbeet, grown for biofuel, is being considered as an alternate cool-season crop in the southeastern U.S. coastal plain. Typically, the crop would be seeded in the autumn, then grow through the winter and be harvested the following spring. Labels for herbicides registered for use on sugarbeet grown in the traditional sugarbeet production regions do not list any of the cool-season weeds common in the southeastern United States. Field trials were initiated near Ty Ty, GA, to evaluate all possible combinations of ethofumesate applied PRE, phenmedipham+desmedipham applied POST, clopyralid POST, and triflusulfuron POST for cool-season weed control in sugarbeet. Phenmedipham+desmedipham alone and in combination with clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron effectively controlled cutleaf eveningprimrose, lesser swinecress, henbit, and corn spurry when applied to seedling weeds. Ethofumesate PRE alone was not as effective in controlling cool-season weeds compared to treatments containing phenmedipham+desmedipham POST. However, ethofumesate PRE applied sequentially with phenmedipham+desmedipham POST improved weed control consistency. Clopyralid and/or triflusulfuron alone did not adequately control cutleaf eveningprimrose. Triflusulfuron alone effectively controlled wild radish. In the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 seasons, December-applied POST herbicides did not injure sugarbeet. However, in the 2015–2016 season POST herbicides were applied in late October. On the day of treatment, the maximum temperature was 25.4 C, which exceeded the established upper temperature limit of 22 C for safe application of phenmedipham+desmedipham, and sugarbeet plants were severely injured. In the southeastern United States, temperatures frequently exceed 22 C in early autumn, which may limit phenmedipham+desmedipham use for controlling troublesome cool-season weeds of sugarbeet in the region. Weed control options need to be expanded to compensate for this limitation.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence: W. Carroll Johnson, III, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793-0748. (Email: Carroll.Johnson@ars.usda.gov)

References

Hide All
Anonymous (2017a) Betamix® herbicide specimen label. http://fs1.agrian.com/pdfs/Betamix_Herbicide_Label2.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Anonymous (2017b) Nortron SC® herbicide specimen label. https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/www.agrian.com/pdfs/Nortron_SC1_Herbicide_Label.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Anonymous (2017c) Stinger® herbicide specimen label. https://assets.greenbook.net/L12803.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Anonymous (2017d) UpBeet® herbicide specimen label. http://fs1.agrian.com/pdfs/DuPont_UpBeet_Herbicide_Label2w.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Armstrong, JQ, Sprague, CL (2010) Weed management in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet. Weed Sci 24:523528
Bollman, SL, Sprague, CL (2009) Effect of tillage and soil-applied herbicides with micro-rate herbicide programs on weed control and sugarbeet growth. Weed Technol 23:264269
Finkenstadt, VL (2014) A review on the complete utilization of the sugarbeet. Sugar Tech 16:339346
Kaffka, S, Tharp, R (2013) Sugarbeet production in the Imperial Valley. American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists. http://ucanr.edu/sites/sugarbeets/files/224142.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Kahn, MFR (2015) Update on adoption of glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet in the United States. Outlooks on Pest Management 26:6165
Kemp, NJ, Taylor, EC, Renner, KA (2009) Weed management in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant sugarbeet. Weed Technol 23:416424
Kniss, AR, Wilson, RG, Martin, AR, Burgener, PA, Feuz, DM (2004) Economic evaluation of glyphosate-resistant and conventional sugar beet. Weed Technol 18:388396
Lati, RN, Mou, B, Rachuy, JS, Fennimore, SA (2016) Light intensity is a main factor affecting fresh market spinach tolerance for phenmedipham. Weed Sci 64:146153
McMinimy MA (2016) U.S. sugar fundamentals. Congressional Research Service. R43998 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43998.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Owen, MDK (2016) Diverse approaches to herbicide-resistant weed management. Weed Sci 64(Suppl):570584
Panella, L (2010) Sugar beet as an energy crop. Sugar Tech 12:288293
Shaner, DL (2014) Lessons learned from the history of herbicide resistance. Weed Sci 62:427431
Starke, RJ, Renner, KA (1996) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) response to triflusulfuron and desmedipham plus phenmedipham. Weed Technol 10:121126
USDA-Census of Agriculture (2014) 2012 census of agriculture—Georgia; Table 37 Specified Crops by Acres Harvested. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Georgia/st13_1_037_037.pdf. Accessed: December 13, 2017
Webster, TM (2014) Weed survey—common and troublesome weeds in cole crops and greens. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 67:284
Webster, TM (2012) Weed survey—common and troublesome weeds in wheat. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:286287
Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Scully, BT, Johnson, WC III, Davis, RF, Brenneman, TB (2016) Yield potential of spring-harvested sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) depends on autumn planting date. Ind Crop Prod 83:5560
Wilson, RG, Sbatella, GM (2011) Late-season weed control in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet. Weed Technol 25:350355
Winter, SR, Weise, AF (1978) Phytotoxicity and yield response of sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) to a mixture of phenmedipham and desmedipham. Weed Sci 26:14
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed