Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:58:07.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liverwort (Marchantia Polymorpha) Control with Quinoclamine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James E. Altland ,
Glenn Wehtje ,
Charles H. Gilliam  and
Michael E. Miller
James E. Altland*
Affiliation:
Horticulture, Oregon State University, 15210 NE Miley Rd., Aurora, OR 97002
Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
Charles H. Gilliam
Affiliation:
Horticulture, Auburn University
Michael E. Miller
Affiliation:
Biological Science, Auburn University
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: james.altland@oregonstate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quinoclamine has been evaluated for POST control of liverwort in nursery crop production. Nearly all previous research has assumed that high spray volumes (e.g., > 935 L/ha) were required for quinoclamine to be effective. To test this assumption, quinoclamine was applied to liverwort in a factorial treatment arrangement of three rates (1.4, 1.9, and 3.8 kg ai/ha), three spray volumes (374, 1,112, and 1,871 L/ha), and two spray pressures (276 and 414 kPa). Control was influenced primarily by quinoclamine rate, although there was a trend for greater control with higher spray pressure. Absorption and translocation studies using 14C-quinoclamine established that 14C absorption into liverwort thalli approached 70% of the amount applied within 9 h after application. Although liverwort lacks vascular tissue, 14C is readily translocated away from the site of entry and tended to accumulate at thallus margins. Neither absorption nor translocation was influenced by spray volume. The perceived requirement for high spray volume may be a misdirected assumption on the basis of the high proportion of inert ingredients within the current formulation. Conversely, this assumption has no basis within liverwort biology or quinoclamine behavior.

Keywords

Liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha L.quinoclamineHepatophytaherbicide adsorptionherbicide translocationnursery crops
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 483 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Altland, J. E. 2005. Get a handle on liverwort. Nurs. Manage. Prof. 21 (11):44–51.Google Scholar
Altland, J., Newby, A., and Regan, R. 2003. Determine efficacy and phytotoxicity of quinoclamine. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 53:383–386.Google Scholar
Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Bipyridyliums. Pages 185–199. in Mode of Action of Herbicides. New York J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bode, L. E. 1987. Spray application technology. Pages 85–110. in McWhorter, C.G. and Gebhardt, M.R. eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. Champaign, IL: WSSA Monograph 4.Google Scholar
Doyle, W. T. 1970. The Biology of Higher Cryptogams. Toronto, ON Macmillan. 63–67.Google Scholar
Durand, E. J. 1908. The development of the sexual organs and sporogonium of Marchantia polymorpha . Bull. Torrey Botan. Club. 35 (7):321–335.Google Scholar
England, J. and Jeger, M. 2006. Liverwort gemmae dispersal: the effect of overhead irrigation and its influence on gemmae production. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 60:24.[Abstract].Google Scholar
File, S., Knight, P., Reynolds, D., Gilliam, C. H., Edwards, J., and Harkess, R. 1999. Alternative weed control options for large container production. Proc. South. Nurs. Assoc. Res. Conf. 44:501–504.Google Scholar
Langmaid, M. 1987. Herbicides used in propagation at Wight Nurseries. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 37:539–540.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J., Osborne, K., Steer-George, C., and West, J. 2003. Commercially available organic mulches as a weed barrier for container production. Comp. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 53:590–593.Google Scholar
McConaha, M. 1941. Ventral structures effecting capillarity in the Marchantiales. Am. J. Bot. 28:301–306.Google Scholar
McKinlay, K. S., Ashford, R., and Ford, F. J. 1974. Effects of drop size, spray volume and dosage on paraquat toxicity. Weed Sci. 22:31–34.Google Scholar
Newby, A., Altland, J. E., Gilliam, C. H., and Wehtje, G. 2006. Postemergence liverwort control in container-grown nursery crops. J. Environ. Hort. 24:230–236.Google Scholar
Newby, A., Altland, J., Gilliam, C., Wehtje, G., and Fare, D. 2005. Preemergence control of Marchantia polymorpha . Proc. South. Nurs. Assoc. Res. Conf. 50:444–445.Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, M. E. 1926. Germination of spores and early stages in development of gametophyte of Marchantia polymorpha . Botan. Gaz. 82:215–222.Google Scholar
Reichard, D. L. and Triplett, G. B. 1983. Paraquat efficacy as influenced by atomizer type. Weed Sci. 31:779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rota, J. A. and Maravola, N. C. 1975. Transport and mobilization of 14C-sucrose during regeneration in the hepatic, Marchantia polymorpha . Botan. Gaz. 136:184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, , 2001. The SAS system for Windows. Release 8.2. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 45–48.Google Scholar
Senesac, A. F. 2005. Evaluation of Mogeton for liverwort control in container nurseries. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 45:32. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Stamps, , Robert, H., and Chandler, A. L. 2004. Eradication of common liverwort from a soilless growing medium. Hort. Sci. 39:882.Google Scholar
Svenson, S. E. 1997. Controlling common liverworts and moss in nursery production. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Prop. Soc. 47:414–422.Google Scholar
Svenson, S. E. 1998. Suppression of common liverwort growth in containers using irrigation, mulches, fertilizers and herbicides. Proc. South. Nurs. Res. Conf. 43:396–398.Google Scholar
Svenson, S. E. 2002. Give Marchantia its marching orders. Digger 46:39–46.Google Scholar
Svenson, S. and Deuel, W. 2000. Using quinoclamine and meadowfoam seed meal to control liverworts in containers. Proc. South. Nurs. Res. Conf. 45:391–393.Google Scholar
Underwood, L. M. 1895. Notes on our Hepaticae, III. The distribution of the North American Marchantiaceae. Botan. Gaz. 20:59–71.Google Scholar
Voth, P. D. and Hamner, K. C. 1940. Response of Marchantia polymorpha to nutrient supply and photoperiod. Botan. Gaz. 102:169–205.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., Dylewski, D. P., McGuire, J. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1991. Antagonism of paraquat phytotoxicity in peanuts and selected weed species by naptalam. Weed Sci. 39:634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar