Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Field-Scale Time of Weed Removal in Canola

  • K. Neil Harker (a1), John T. O'Donovan (a1), George W. Clayton (a2) and John Mayko (a3)

Abstract

Field-scale experiments were conducted at several western Canada locations to determine the importance of early weed removal over variable landscapes. In eight of 10 cases, imidazolinone-resistant (IR) canola yield decreased linearly as herbicide application (15/15 g/ha imazamox/imazethapyr or 15/15 g/ha imazamox/imazethapyr plus 150 g/ha clopyralid) was delayed beyond the one- to two-leaf stage. In two of 10 cases, canola oil content also decreased as herbicide treatment was delayed. Canola yields at all environments (location by year combinations) averaged 2,073, 1,872, or 1,650 kg/ha when treated at the one- to two-, three- to five-, or six- to seven-leaf stage, respectively. Assuming canola prices from a low of $250/t to a high of $650/t, growers could lose $50 to $131/ha, respectively, by delaying herbicide application from the one- to two- to the three- to five-leaf stage, or $106 to $275/ha, respectively, by delaying herbicide application from the one- to two- to the six- to seven-leaf stage.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: harkerk@agr.gc.ca.

References

Hide All
Clayton, G. W., Harker, K. N., O'Donovan, J. T., Baig, M. N., and Kidnie, M. J. 2002. Glyphosate timing and tillage system effects on glyphosate-tolerant canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol 16:124130.
Harker, K. N. 2001. Survey of yield losses due to weeds in central Alberta. Can J. Plant Sci 81:339342.
Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., and Johnston, A. M. 1999. Time of weed removal for canola. in Proceeding of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress. September 26 to 29, Canberra, Australia. [CD ROM]. 4.
Martin, S. G., Friesen, L. F., and Van Acker, R. C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci 49:326333.
O'Donovan, J. T. 1991. Quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.] interference in canola (Brassica campestris L.). Weed Sci 39:397401.
O'Donovan, J. T., Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., and Blackshaw, R. E. 2006. Comparison of a glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus L.) system with traditional herbicide regimes. Weed Technol 20:494501.
O'Donovan, J. T., Kirkland, K. J., and Sharma, A. K. 1989. Canola yield and profitability as influenced by volunteer wheat infestations. Can. J. Plant Sci 69:12351244.
O'Donovan, J. T., Sharma, A. K., Kirkland, K. J., and de St. Remy, E. A. 1988. Volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare) interference in canola (Brassica campestris and B. napus). Weed Sci 36:734739.
SAS Institute 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC 27511.
Senseman, S. A., editor. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 458.
Swanton, C. J., Harker, K. N., and Anderson, R. L. 1993. Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol 7:537542.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Field-Scale Time of Weed Removal in Canola

  • K. Neil Harker (a1), John T. O'Donovan (a1), George W. Clayton (a2) and John Mayko (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.