Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:15:35.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing Herbicide Selectivity with Water-Repellent Adjuvants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric A. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: pennerd@msu.edu

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to determine if adjuvants with water-repellent properties could reduce herbicide retention on foliage, and thereby absorption, of the spray solution and to determine if herbicide activity was maintained with a reduction in herbicide retention. Water-repellent adjuvants, DC 2-1322, DC 1-6184, and DC 772, were evaluated with three herbicides, isoxaflutole, pendimethalin, and flumioxazin, and on three crop species, cabbage, tomato, and wheat. The water repellents DC 2-1322 and DC 772 were ineffective with these herbicides and these crop species. DC 1-6184 effectively reduced spray retention for all three herbicides evaluated, regardless of formulation, on all three species. The efficacy of DC 1-6184 was more evident if the spray application was restricted to the plant foliage. The water-repellent DC 1-6184 has potential to decrease injury while maintaining weed control with certain herbicides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Davies, P. J., Drennan, D. S. H., Fryer, J. D., and Holly, K. 1967. The basis of the differential phytotoxicity of 4-hydroxy-3,5-diiodobenzonitrile I. The influence of spray retention and plant morphology. Weed Res. 7:220233.Google Scholar
Green, J. H. and Green, J. M. 1991. Dynamic surface tension as a predictor of herbicide enhancement by surface active agents. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 4:357–265.Google Scholar
Harbour, J. D., Messersmith, C. G., and Ramsdale, B. K. 2003. Surfactants affect herbicides on kochia (Kochia scoparia) and Russian thistle (Salsola iberica). Weed Sci. 51:430434.Google Scholar
Hart, W. E., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1992. Influence of adjuvants on the efficacy, absorption, and spray retention of primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:592598.Google Scholar
Hazen, J. L. 2000. Adjuvants—terminology, classification, and chemistry. Weed Technol. 14:773784.Google Scholar
Penner, D. and Fausey, J. C. 2001. Targeting preemergence activity with postemergence applications of flumioxazin. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 41:172.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, F. C., Rowe, L., Penner, D., Petroff, L., and Burow, R. 1990. Increasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicone adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:576580.Google Scholar
Ruiter, H. D., Uffing, A. J. M., Meinen, E., and Prins, A. 1990. Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Sci. 38:567572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1999. Protection of corn from early postemergence applications of isoxaflutole with metolachlor and benoxacor. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 39:137138.Google Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: WSSA.Google Scholar