Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:59:16.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Tillage and Light Environment on Emergence of 13 Annual Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas D. Buhler
Douglas D. Buhler*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2150 Pammel Drive, Ames, IA 50011; buhler@nstl.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds of many plant species require a brief exposure to light to induce germination. Modifying the light environment during soil tillage may alter weed emergence in agricultural systems. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of secondary tillage conducted during daylight and at night on the emergence of 13 summer annual weed species under the same soil and environmental conditions. Annual grass and large-seeded broadleaf species showed little response to light environment during tillage. However, emergence was often less when no tillage was conducted than with any tillage by light environment combination. Emergence of small-seeded broadleaf species often was lower when tillage was conducted during darkness than with tillage during the light. Reductions varied by experiment and species and ranged from 70% for common lambsquarters to less than 30% for Pennsylvania smartweed. Large variations in response also occurred within species.

Keywords

Common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALPennsylvania smartweed, Polygonum pensylvanicum L. # POLPY.Dark tillagephotodormancyweed ecologyweed population dynamicsCHEALPOLPY
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 496 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, R. N. 1968. Evaluating herbicides in a soybean-weed nursery. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 23:29–30.Google Scholar
Ascard, J. 1994. Soil cultivation in darkness reduced weed emergence. Acta Hortic. 372:167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1985. Seasonal changes in the germination responses of buried witchgrass (Panicum capillare) seeds. Weed Sci. 34:22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwmeester, H. J. and Karssen, C. M. 1993. Seasonal periodicity in germination of seeds of Chenopodium album L. Ann. Bot. 72:462–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, J. W. and Kendrick, R. E. 1986. Photocontrol of seed germination. In Kendrick, R. E. and Kronberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Dordrecht, Netherlands: W. D. Junk. pp. 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egley, G. H. 1986. Stimulation of weed seed germination in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:67–89.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. 1989. Some effects of nitrate-treated soil upon the sensitivity of buried redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) seeds to ethylene, temperature, light, and carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 12:581–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federer, W. T. 1967. Experimental Design Theory and Application. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH, pp. 288–298.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D.S.H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1984. The influence of burial and dry-storage upon cyclic changes in dormancy, germination and response to light in seeds of various weeds. New Phytol. 96:473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1996. Alternative model of light sensitive germination induced by seed burial. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. p. 45.Google Scholar
Gerhards, R., Klumper, H., and Kuhbauch, W. 1993. Photobiologische Unkrautregulierung im landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenbau. Mitt. Ges. Pflanzenbauwiss 6:261–264.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. M. and Nezadal, W. 1990. Photocontrol of weeds without herbicides. Naturwissenschaften 77:158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherly, L. G. and Elmore, C. D. 1983. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) to planting in unfilled, weedy seedbed on clay soil. Weed Sci. 31:93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, I. E. 1970. The effects of light, potassium nitrate and temperature on the germination of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 10:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. K. 1995. Effect of light environment during soil disturbance on germination and emergence pattern of weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 127:561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCroix, L. J. and Staniforth, D. W. 1964. Seed dormancy in velvetleaf. Weeds 12:171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, B. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997. Tillage systems and crop residue management impacts on soil physical properties: implications for weed management. In Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., and Stewart, B. A., eds. Weed Biology, Soil Management and Weed Management. Advances in Soil Science Series. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. (in press)Google Scholar
Mancinelli, A. L. 1994. The physiology of phytochrome action. In Kendrick, R. and Kronberg, G., eds. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. 2nd ed. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. pp. 211–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, T. L. 1991. Induction of dark dormancy in seeds: its importance for the seed bank in the soil. Funct. Ecol. 5:669–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. H. and Benjamin, S. K. 1979. The interaction of light, nitrate and alternating temperature on the germination of Chenopodium album. Capsella bursa-pastoris, and Poa annua before and after chilling. Seed Sci. Technol. 7:379–392.Google Scholar
Salisbury, F. B. and Ross, C. W. 1978. In Plant Physiology. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. pp. 290–302.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. and Struik, G. 1964. A possible ecological relation between soil disturbance, light flash, and seed germination. J. Ecol. 45:884–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballare, C. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1994. Photostimulation of seed germination during soil tillage. New Phytol. 126:145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballare, C. L., and Sanchez, R. A. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivations. Plant Cell Environ. 14:501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staricka, J. A., Burford, P. M., Allmaras, R. R., and Nelson, W. W. 1990. Tracing the vertical distribution of simulated shattered seeds as related to tillage. Agron. J. 82:1131–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1972. Phytochrome controlled changes in dormancy and germination of buried weed seeds. Weed Sci. 20:417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, E. M. and Roberts, E. H. 1977. The interaction of light, nitrate and alternating temperatures in promoting the germination of dormant seeds of common weed species. Seed Sci. Technol. 5:659–670.Google Scholar
Wesson, G. and Wareing, P. F. 1969. The induction of light sensitivity in weed seeds by burial. J. Exp. Bot. 20:414–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, J. T. and Stoller, E. W. 1978. Light penetration and light-induced seed germination in soil. Plant Physiol. 61:597–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed