Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:34:53.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of rate and timing of indaziflam on ‘Sunbelt’ and muscadine grape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2019

Nicholas T. Basinger Open the ORCID record for Nicholas T. Basinger [Opens in a new window] ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
David W. Monks  and
Wayne E. Mitchem
Nicholas T. Basinger*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Wayne E. Mitchem
Affiliation:
Extension Associate and Southern Small Fruit Consortium Coordinator, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Mills River, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Nicholas T. Basinger, Email: Nicholas.Basinger@uga.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted at six locations across North Carolina to determine tolerance of ‘Sunbelt’ grape (bunch grape) and muscadine grape (‘Carlos’, ‘Triumph’, ‘Summit’) to indaziflam herbicide. Treatments included indaziflam (0, 50, 73 g ai ha–1) or flumioxazin (213 g ai ha–1) applied alone in April, and sequential applications of indaziflam (36, 50, 73 g ai ha–1) or flumioxazin (213 g ai ha–1) applied in April followed by the same rate applied in June. No crop injury was observed across locations. Muscadine yield was not affected by herbicide treatments. Yield of ‘Sunbelt’ grape increased with sequential applications of indaziflam at 73 g ha–1 when compared to a single application of indaziflam at 50 g ha–1 or flumioxazin at 213 g ha–1 in 2015. Sequential applications of flumioxazin at 213 g ha–1 reduced ‘Sunbelt’ yield compared to a single application of indaziflam at 73 g ha–1 in 2016. Trunk cross-sectional area was unaffected by herbicide treatments. Fruit quality (soluble solids concentration, titratable acidity, and pH) for muscadine and bunch grape was not affected by herbicide treatments. Indaziflam was safe to use at registered rates and could be integrated into weed management programs for southern US vineyards.

Keywords

Bradley Hanson, University of California, DavisFlumioxazinindaziflambunch grapeVitis labrusca L.muscadine grapeVitis rotundifolia MichxCrop safetyvegetation-free stripvineyard floor managementvineyard maintenancevineyard weed management
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 380 - 385
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abit, MJM, Rainbolt, CM, Krutz, LJ, Shaner, DL, Hanson, BD (2012) Effects of long-term use on simazine dissipation in central California vineyards. Weed Sci 60:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agusti-Brisach, C, Gramaje, D, León, M, Garcia-Jiménez, J, Armengol, J (2011) Evaluation of vineyard weeds as potential hosts of black-foot and Petri disease pathogens. Plant Dis 95:803–810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcorta, M, Fidelibus, MW, Steenwerth, KL, Shrestha, A (2011) Effect of vineyard row orientation on growth and phenology of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 59:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2012) Alion® Herbicide Product Label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. 63 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017) Alion® Herbicide Product Label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. 63 p.Google Scholar
Basinger, NT, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Mitchem, WE, Chaudhari, S, Heitman, JL, Havlin, JL, Howard, AM, Spayd, SE (2018) Vegetation-free strip width affects growth, berry composition, and yield of Cabernet Franc in vigorous growing environments. Catalyst 2:15–23Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Harker, KN (2017) Our top 10 herbicide-resistant weed management practices. Pest Manag Sci 73:1045–1052CCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpio, CE, Safley, CD, Poling, EB (2008) Estimated costs and investment analysis of producing and harvesting muscadine grapes in the southeastern United States. HortTechnol 18:308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celette, F, Findeling, A, Gary, C (2009) Competition for nitrogen in an unfertilized intercropping system: the case of an association of grapevine and grass cover in a Mediterranean climate. Eur J Agron 30:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, BG (1995) Adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Aust J Grape Wine Res 1:100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, R, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper, ND, ed., Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd edn. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Delgado, AM, Ashigh, J, Shukla, MK, Perkins, R (2015) Mobility of indaziflam influenced by soil properties in a semi-arid area. PLOS one 10(5):e0126100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, TA, Hickey, CC, Wolf, TK (2011) Cover crop, rootstock, and root restriction regulate vegetative growth of Cabernet Sauvignon in a humid environment. Am J Enol Vitic 62:298–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havlin, JL, Hardy, DH, Ghel, RJ, Spayd, SE (2012) Survey of nutrient status in Vitis vinifera grapes in North Carolina. Commun Soil Sci Plan 43:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2018) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: March 20, 2018Google Scholar
Hickey, CC, Hatch, TA, Stallings, J, Wolf, TK (2016) Under-trellis cover crop and rootstock affect growth, yield components, and fruit composition of Cabernet Sauvignon. Am J Enol Vitic 67:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, S, Howard, A, Heitman, JL, Sauer, TJ, Giese, W, Sutton, TB, Agam, N, Havlin, J (2014) Implications of tall fescue for inter-row water dynamics in a vineyard. Agron J 106:1267–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, MD, Gannon, TW (2016) Soil organic matter content and volumetric water content affect indaziflam soil bioavailability. Weed Sci 64:757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Singh, M (2012) Leaching of indaziflam compared with residual herbicides common in Florida citrus. Weed Technol 26:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadir, S, Al-Khatib, K (2006) Weed control in grape after fall and spring application of selected herbicides. Weed Technol 20:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Mitchem, WE (2014) Effect of weed-free strip width on newly established ‘Navaho’ blackberry growth, yield, and fruit quality. Weed Technol 28:426–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nita, M, Brannen, PM, Burrack, HJ, Pfeiffer, DG, Mitchem, WE, Lockwood, DW, Sial, AA (2017) Southeast Regional Bunch Grape Integrated Management Guide. 76 p. http://www.smallfruits.org/assets/documents/ipm-guides/2017/2017BunchGrapeSprayGuide10-2-2017.pdf. Accessed: December 9, 2018Google Scholar
Parker, ML, Meyer, JR (1996) Peach tree vegetative and root growth respond to orchard floor management. HortScience 31:330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanguankeo, PP, Leon, RG, Malone, J (2009) Impact of weed management practices on grapevine growth and yield components. Weed Sci 57:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, RE, Robinson, MD (2001) Sunlight into Wine: A Handbook for Winegrape Canopy Management. 8th edn. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. 88 p.Google Scholar
Spayd, SE, Wample, RL, Evans, RG, Stevens, RG, Seymour, BJ, Nagel, CW (1994) Nitrogen fertilization of white Riesling grapes in Washington. Must and wine composition. Am J Enol Vitic 45:34–42Google Scholar
Streigler, RK, Carter, PM, Morris, JR, Clark, JR, Threlfall, RT, Howard, LR (2005) Yield, quality, and nutraceutical potential of selected muscadine cultivars grown in southwestern Arkansas. HortTechnol 15:276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture (2017) Quick Statistics. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed: December 9, 2018Google Scholar
Wheeler, SJ, Black, AS, Pickering, GJ (2005) Vineyard floor management improves wine quality in highly vigorous Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ in New Zealand. New Zeal J Crop Hort 33:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wistrom, C, Purcell, AH (2005) The fate of Xylella fastidiosa in vineyard weeds and other alternative hosts in California. Plant Dis 89:944–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar