Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:25:24.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Rate and Carrier on Clomazone Movement Off-site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Sandra J. Halstead  and
R. Gordon Harvey
Sandra J. Halstead
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wis., Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wis., Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1985 and 1986 to determine the influence of herbicide rate, carrier, and carrier volume on off-site movement of clomazone {2-[2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxalidinone} using sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. ‘HY-894’) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Caldwell’) as indicator plants. Clomazone applied at the lowest rate (0.56 kg ai/ha) had less off-site movement than higher rates. Off-site movement was similar among water carrier volumes applied at each clomazone rate but was less when clomazone was impregnated onto dry fertilizer.

Keywords

Herbicide vapor movementvolatilization
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 179 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dekker, J. 1986. Chrono-symptomology of dimethazone (FMC-57020) drift: a Boone Co., Iowa, case study. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:42.Google Scholar
3. Duke, S. O., and Paul, R. N. 1986. Effects of dimethazone (FMC-57020) on chloroplast development. 1. Ultrastructural effects in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) primary leaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 25:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Duke, S. O., Kenyon, W. H., and Paul, R. N. 1985. FMC-57020 effects on chloroplast development in pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) cotyledons. Weed Sci. 33:786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fang, S. C., Theisen, P., and Freed, V. H. 1961. Effects of water evaporation, temperature, and rates of application on the retention of ethyl-N,N-di-N-propylthiocarbamate in various soils. Weeds 9:569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gray, R. A., and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weed Sci. 13:141–147.Google Scholar
7. Parochetti, J. V., Dec, G. W. Jr., and Burt, G. W. 1976. Volatility of eleven dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:529–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Swann, C. W., and Behrens, R. 1972. Phytotoxicity of trifluralin vapors from soil. Weed Sci. 20:143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Swann, C. W., and Behrens, R. 1972. Trifluralin vapor emission from soil. Weed Sci. 20:147–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Taylor, A. W. 1978. Post-application volatilization of pesticides under field conditions. J. Air Pollut. Control 28:922–927.Google Scholar