Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:47:22.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Returns from Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kenneth L. Ferreira ,
Thomas F. Peeper  and
Francis M. Epplin
Kenneth L. Ferreira
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Francis M. Epplin
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Econ., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the influence of winter wheat seeding date and forage removal on the efficacy of cheat control herbicides, forage and grain yields, and net returns to land, overhead, risk, and management for the various cheat control strategies. Economic analysis showed that net returns were higher when wheat was seeded during the traditional seeding period (October) than when either seeded early (September) for increased forage production or delayed (November) for cultural cheat control. Some herbicides were economically beneficial at two of three locations where the initial cheat population exceeded 170 plants/m2.

Keywords

Cheat, Bromus secalinus L. ♯3 BROSEwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Enterprise budgetcyanazineethyl-metribuzinmetribuzinBROSE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 306 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1988. Grain Inspection Handbook. Book II, Wheat. U.S. Dep. Agric., Fed. Grain Inspec. Serv. Google Scholar
2. Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Performance of cyanazine applied postemergence for Bromus control in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:80.Google Scholar
3. Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1989. Cheat control with cyanazine in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:33.Google Scholar
4. Carson, J. 1988. Oklahoma Market Report. 36(44):2–4. State Dep. Agric., Oklahoma City, OK.Google Scholar
5. Carson, J. 1989. Oklahoma Market Report. 37(11):3. State Dep. Agric., Oklahoma City, OK.Google Scholar
6. Carson, J. 1989. Oklahoma Market Report. 37(24):2. State Dep. Agric., Oklahoma City, OK.Google Scholar
7. Cuperus, G., Johnson, R., Tucker, B., Coppock, S., Williams, E., Stiegler, J., Bloome, P., Greer, H., Pitts, J. T., and Fain, D. 1983. Wheat production and pest management in Oklahoma. Okla. State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., Circ. E-831.Google Scholar
8. Denman, C. E., and Arnold, J. 1970. Seasonal forage production for small-grains species in Oklahoma. Okla. State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-680.Google Scholar
9. Epplin, F. M., Tice, T. F., Handke, S. J., Peeper, T. F., and Krenzer, E. G. Jr. 1983. Cost estimates of alternative wheat production systems for Garfield County. Okla State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-766.Google Scholar
10. Gleichsner, J. A., Brewster, B. D., Spinney, R. L., and Appleby, A. P. 1987. Annual brome control in winter wheat. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Weed Sci. Soc., p. 321–322.Google Scholar
11. Greer, H., Fain, D., Peeper, T., and Johnston, R. 1982. Cheat control in wheat. Okla State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., OSU Ext. Facts No. 2774.Google Scholar
12. Harper, H. J. 1961. Grazing and clipping experiments with small-grains pastures in South Central Oklahoma. Okla. State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-585.Google Scholar
13. Huffine, W. W., Adams, N. J., Dewald, C. L., Waller, G. R., and Weeks, D. L. 1960. Production characteristics of Oklahoma forages: small grains. Okla. State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. B-546.Google Scholar
14. Kolp, B. J., Sackett, R. G., and Bohenblust, K. E., and Roehrkasse, G. P. 1973. Effect of rate and date of seeding Shoshoni winter wheat on soil moisture depletion. Agron. J. 65:929–930.Google Scholar
15. Krenzer, E., and Doye, D. 1988. Economic evaluation of wheat varieties grown for forage plus grain. Okla. State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., Curr. Rep. CR-2100.Google Scholar
16. Massee, T. W. 1976. Downy brome control in dryland winter wheat with stubble mulch fallow and seeding management. Agron. J. 68:952–955.Google Scholar
17. Peeper, T. F. 1984. Chemical and biological control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in wheat and alfalfa in North America. Weed Sci. 32(Suppl. 1):18–25.Google Scholar
18. Ratliff, R. L., and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin. Weed Technol. 1:235–241.Google Scholar
19. Reitz, L. P. 1976. Growing winter wheat in the Central Plains: Region IV. p. 26–29 in Wheat in the United States. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Agric. Inf. Bull. No. 386.Google Scholar
20. Runyan, T. J., McNeil, W. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:94–97.Google Scholar
21. Rydrych, D. J., and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60:279–280.Google Scholar
22. Sanders, L., and Anderson, K. 1989. 1989 Government Commodity Provisions. insert in Agricultural Policy and Economic Issues 5:1. Coop. Ext. Serv., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK.Google Scholar
23. Whitesides, R. E., and Swan, D. G. 1986. Metribuzin and ethyl-metribuzin for downy brome control in winter wheat. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Weed Sci. Soc., p. 230–231.Google Scholar