Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:15:31.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution of herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) across row crop production systems in Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2019

Vijay Singh
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Scientist, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Russ Garetson
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Josh McGinty
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
Peter Dotray
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
Gaylon Morgan
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Scott Nolte
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Muthukumar Bagavathiannan*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Muthukumar Bagavathiannan, Assistant Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, 370 Olsen Boulevard, College Station, TX 77843. E-mail: muthu@tamu.edu

Abstract

We conducted a survey in the major row-crop production regions of Texas to determine the response of waterhemp to glyphosate (5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase [EPSPS] inhibitor), atrazine (photosystem II [PSII] inhibitor), pyrithiobac (acetolactate synthase [ALS] inhibitor), tembotrione (hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase [HPPD] inhibitor), fomesafen (protoporphyrinogen oxidase [PPO] inhibitor), and dicamba (synthetic auxin). We evaluated 127 accessions for these herbicides. Resistance was confirmed on the basis of plant survival within an accession, and the injury ratings of surviving plants were used to categorize each accession as resistant (<50% injury) or less sensitive (50% to 89% injury). For glyphosate, approximately 27% of all tested accessions were resistant and 20% were less sensitive. The Gulf Coast region had the most glyphosate-resistant accessions (46% of the accessions from this region), followed by the Blacklands region (9%). A dose-response assay of the most resistant waterhemp accession (TX-25) exhibited 17-fold resistance to glyphosate when compared with a susceptible standard. Waterhemp resistance to atrazine also was common in the Gulf Coast region. The accession with the greatest atrazine resistance (TX-31) exhibited 47- and 68-fold resistance to this herbicide when applied POST and PRE, respectively. Widespread resistance to pyrithiobac was observed in waterhemp accessions throughout the Blacklands and Gulf Coast regions. The most resistant accession identified in this study was 61-fold resistant compared with a susceptible standard. No high-level resistance was detected for tembotrione, dicamba, or fomesafen, but high variability in sensitivity to tembotrione and dicamba was observed. One waterhemp accession exhibited reduced sensitivity to fomesafen; the rest were sensitive. Overall, at least two accessions exhibited resistance or reduced sensitivity to herbicides with five different sites of action. The study illustrates the prevalence of multiple herbicide resistance in waterhemp accessions in Texas and emphasizes the need to implement diversified management tactics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abendroth, JA, Martin, AR, Roeth, FW (2006) Plant response to combinations of mesotrione and photosystem II Inhibitors. Weed Technol 20:267274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DD, Roeth, FW, Martin, AR (1996) Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 10:570575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armel, GR, Hall, GJ, Wilson, HP, Cullen, N (2005) Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci 53:202211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK (2016) Multiple-herbicide resistance is widespread in roadside Palmer amaranth populations. PLoS ONE 11:e0148748 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battles, B, Hartzler, B, Buhler, D (1998) Effect of common waterhemp emergence date in soybeans on growth and competitiveness. Proc N Cent Weed Sci Soc 53:145146 Google Scholar
Benbrook, CM (2016) Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ Sci Eur 28:3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bensch, CN, Horak, MJ, Peterson, D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci 51:3743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, ML, Crespo, RJ, Kruger, GR, Gaussoin, R, Tranel, PJ (2012) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population resistant to 2,4-D. Weed Sci 60:379384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollman, JD, Boerboom, CM, Becker, RL, Fritz, VA (2008) Efficacy and tolerance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in sweet corn. Weed Technol 22:666674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, IC, Yenish, JP, Pittman, D, Gallagher, RS (2009) Resistance of a prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) biotype to 2,4-D. Weed Technol 23:586591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, CM (2016) Characterization of a novel five-way-resistant population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). MS thesis. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 98 pGoogle Scholar
Foes, MJ, Liu, L, Tranel, PJ, Wax, LM, Stoller, EW (1998) A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci 31:514520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franssen, AS, Skinner, DZ, Al-Khatib, K, Horak, MJ, Kulakow, PA (2001) Interspecific hybridization and gene flow of ALS resistance in Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 49:598606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, TA, Ward, SM, Bukun, B, Preston, C, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2012) Interspecific hybridization transfers a previously unknown glyphosate resistance mechanism in Amaranthus species. Evol Appl 5:2938 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garetson, R, Singh, V, Singh, S, Dotray, P, Bagavathiannan, M (2019) Distribution of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in row crop production systems in Texas. Weed Technol 33:355365 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stoller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:1420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Simmons, FW, Stoller, EW (1997) Waterhemp management in agronomic crops. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, RG, Buhler, DD, Stoltenberg, DE (1999) Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci 1:578584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, NE, Singh, S, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Kaundan, SS, Polge, ND, Thomas, DA, Hager, AG (2011) Resistance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in a population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Illinois, United States. Pest Manag Sci 67:258261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, IM (2019) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Assessed: March 31, 2019Google Scholar
Hinz, JR, Owen, MD (1997) Acetolactate synthase resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) population. Weed Technol 11:1318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, MJ, Peterson, DE (1995) Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol 9:192195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, BC, Young, BG, Matthews, JL (2002) Effect of postemergence application rate and timing of mesotrione on corn (Zea mays) response and weed control. Weed Technol 16:414420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, RS, Man, AB, Sahid, IB (2004) Weed problems and their management in rice fields of Malaysia: an overview. Weed Biol Manag 4:177186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci 56:582587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, GG, Mohammed, MY, Dotray, PA, Chandler, JM, Wright, RJ (2011) Glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) confirmed in Texas. Weed Technol 25:480485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, ST, Wax, LM, Horak, MJ, Peterson, DE (1996) Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea resistance in a biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci 44:789794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, R, Evans, AF, Riechers, DE (2016) Differential responses to preemergence and postemergence atrazine in two atrazine-resistant waterhemp populations. Agron J 108:1196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullan, PM, Green, JM (2011) Identification of a tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype resistant to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides, atrazine, and thifensulfuron in Iowa. Weed Technol 25:514518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ NAAS] National Agricultural Statistics Service (2019) Agricultural chemical use program. U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Chemical_Use/. Accessed: June 15, 2019Google Scholar
Neve, P, Powles, S (2005) High survival frequencies at low herbicide use rates in populations of Lolium rigidum result in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance. Heredity 95:485492 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordby, D, Hartzler, B, Bradley, K (2007) Biology and management of waterhemp. The glyphosate, crops, and weeds series. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Extension. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(sp1):3162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Hager, AG (2005) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci 53:3036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Sandell, LD, Knezevic, SZ, Aulakh, JS, Lindquist, JL, Irmak, S, Jhala, AJ (2015) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 29:8292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleufer, IL, Roeth, FW, Mortensen, DA (1992) Triazine-resistant Amaranthus control. Proc N Cent Weed Sci Soc 47:2021 Google Scholar
Shergill, LS, Barlow, BR, Bish, MD, Bradley, KW (2018) Investigations of 2, 4-D and multiple herbicide resistance in a Missouri waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population. Weed Sci 66:386394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoup, DE, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2003) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 51:145150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, SA, Gonzini, LC, Mitsdarfer, C, Davis, AS, Riechers, DE, Hager, AG (2019) Characterization of multiple herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations from Illinois to VLCFA-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 67:369379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, DA, Hallett, SG (2006) Variable response of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations and individuals to glyphosate. Weed Technol 20:466471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, CL, Stoller, EW, Wax, LM, Horak, MJ (1997) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 1:192197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, L (2017) Recent Midsouth studies show dicamba not very effective on some populations of glyphosate/PPO-resistant Palmer amaranth. http://news.utcrops.com/2017/05/recent-midsouth-studies-show-dicamba-not-effective-populations-glyphosateppo-resistant-palmer-amaranth/. Accessed: August 24, 2019Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Sprague, CL (2004) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn. Weed Sci 52:359364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, P, Richards, C, Buren, L, Glasgow, L (2002) Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize. Pest Manag Sci 58:981984 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tehranchian, P, Norsworthy, JK, Powles, S, Bararpour, MT, Bagavathiannan, MV, Barber, T, Scott, RC (2017) Recurrent sublethal-dose selection for reduced susceptibility of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to dicamba. Weed Sci 65:206212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varanasi, VK, Godar, AS, Currie, RS, Dille, AJ, Thompson, CR, Stahlman, PW, Jugulam, M (2015). Field-evolved resistance to four modes of action of herbicides in a single kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad.) population. Pest Manag Sci 71:12071212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennapusa, AR, Faleco, F, Vieira, B, Samuelson, S, Kruger, GR, Werle, R, Jugulam, M (2018) Prevalence and mechanism of atrazine resistance in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Nebraska. Weed Sci 66:595602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB, Beard, BR, Parkin, BT, Porter, SA (2004) Multiple-herbicide resistance across four modes of action in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Weed Sci 52:813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, S (2017) New tool available to fight herbicide-resistant weeds. http://texasfarmbureau.org/new-tool-available-fight-herbicide-resistant-weeds/. Accessed: October 23, 2018Google Scholar
Wetzel, DK, Horak, MJ, Skinner, DZ, Kulakow, PA (1999) Transferal of herbicide resistance traits from Amaranthus palmeri to Amaranthus rudis . Weed Sci 1:538543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerffel, RJ, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2015) Characterization of PPO-inhibitor-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) response to soil-applied PPO-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 63:511521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar