Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:39:37.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) with Herbicides and Perennial Grass Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Tom D. Whitson
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
David W. Koch
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

Abstract

Long-term control of downy brome with an integrated approach is needed in order to sustain range productivity. Studies were conducted to study the effectiveness of a combination of downy brome control practices. In two studies, glyphosate and paraquat were evaluated at various rates for up to three successive years for control of downy brome in rangeland. A third study evaluated the competitiveness of perennial cool-season grasses against downy brome in the absence of herbicides. Glyphosate, at 0.55 kg/ha, and 0.6 kg/ha paraquat provided selective downy brome control on rangeland when applications were combined with intensive grazing. Downy brome control was greater than 90% following two sequential years of 0.6 kg/ha paraquat at either the two- to eight-leaf stage or bloom stage at both study locations. At one study location, 0.55 kg/ha glyphosate provided 97% control after the first application at both growth stages. In the second study, control averaged greater than 92% following three sequential applications of glyphosate. When perennial cool-season grasses were seeded in the spring following fall tillage (no herbicides) and allowed to establish for three growing seasons, three of the five species were effective in reducing the reestablishment of downy brome. ‘Luna’ pubescent wheatgrass, ‘Hycrest’ crested wheatgrass, ‘Sodar’ streambank wheatgrass, ‘Bozoisky’ Russian wildrye, and ‘Critana’ thickspike wheatgrass controlled 100, 91, 85, 45, and 32% of the downy brome, respectively. Yields of perennial grass dry matter were 1,714, 1,596, 1,135, 900, and 792 kg/ha. Replacing noncompetitive annual grasses with competitive cool-season perennials will provide a longer term solution to a downy brome problem than the use of herbicides alone or with intensive grazing.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, E. B. and Knight, D. H. 1984. The effects of introduced annuals on secondary succession in sagebrush–grassland, Wyoming. The Southwest. Nat. 29:407421.Google Scholar
Austin, D. D., Stevens, R., Jorgensen, K. R., and Urness, P. J. 1994. Preferences of mule deer for 16 grasses found on intermountain winter ranges. J. Range Manage. 47:308311.Google Scholar
Carter, J. F. 1962. Urbage sampling for yield, tame pasture. Pasture Range Res. Techniques, Part IV. pp. 90101.Google Scholar
Cook, C. W. and Harris, L. E. 1952. Nutritive value of cheatgrass and crested wheatgrass on spring ranges of Utah. J. Range Manage. 5:332337.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. F. 1970. Steppe vegetation of Washington. Pullman, WA: Washington Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 62. 131 p.Google Scholar
Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1977. Weed control–revegetation systems for big sagebrush-downy brome rangelands. J. Range Manage. 30:331336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, A. S. 1950. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. 2nd ed, Reviewed by A. Chase, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office U.S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ. 200. 1051 p.Google Scholar
Hosten, P. E. and West, N. E. 1992. Cheatgrass Dynamics Following Wildfire on a Sagebrush Semi-Desert Site in Central Utah. Proc. Symp. Ecol. Manage. Restor. Intermt. Annu. Range. pp. 5662.Google Scholar
Hull, A. C. 1965. Cheatgrass—A Persistent Homesteader. U.S. Dep. Int. Bur. Land Manage. Cheatgrass Symp. Proc. pp. 2026.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. and Aguirre, L. 1991. Effect of water on morphological development in seedlings of three range grasses: root branching patterns. J. Range Manage. 4:355360.Google Scholar
Klemp, G. J. and Hull, A. C. Jr. 1971. Methods for seeding three perennial wheatgrass on cheatgrass ranges in southern Idaho. J. Range Manage. 25:266268.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N. 1981. Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into Western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-ecosystems 7:145165.Google Scholar
Mansen, S. B. and Shaw, N. E. 1983. Seeding antelope bitterbrush with grasses on south-central Idaho rangelands—a 39-year response. USDA Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-152. [not paginated].Google Scholar
Morrow, L. A. and Stahlman, P. W. 1984. The history and distribution of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in North America. Weed Sci. 32:26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. B., Mayland, H. F., and Van Soest, P. J. 1978. Growth and Nutritional Value to Cattle of Grasses on Cheatgrass Range in Southern Idaho. USDA Forest Service Res. Paper INT-199. 57 p.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. 1992. A Review of the Chemical Control of Downy Brome. Proc. Symp. Ecol., Manage. Restor. Intermt. Annu. Range. pp. 194196.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. H. 1971. Changes on a sagebrush–grass range in Nevada ungrazed for 30 years. J. Range Manage. 24:397400.Google Scholar
Svejcar, T. and Tausch, R. 1991. Anaho Island, Nevada: a relict area dominated by annual invader species. Rangelands 13:233236.Google Scholar
West, N. E., Provenza, F. D., Johnson, P. S., and Owens, K. M. 1984. Vegetation change after 13 years of livestock grazing exclusion on sagebrush semi-desert in west central Utah. J. Range Manage. 37:262264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1973. Downy brome—intruder in the plant succession of big sagebrush communities in the Great Basin. J. Range Manage. 26:410419.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Tipton, F. 1990. Invasion of Cheatgrass into Arid Environments of the Lahontan Basin. USDA Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-276.Google Scholar