Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T18:44:51.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Response to Atrazine and Alachlor Combinations at Low Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

I. O. Akobundu ,
R. D. Sweet ,
W. B. Duke  and
P. L. Minotti
I. O. Akobundu
Affiliation:
Dep. of Veg. Crops, Cornell Univ.
R. D. Sweet
Affiliation:
Dep. of Veg. Crops, Cornell Univ.
W. B. Duke
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ.
P. L. Minotti
Affiliation:
Dep. of Veg. Crops, Cornell Univ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early postemergence application of atrazine [2-chloro-4- (ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] at 0.28 kg/ha in combination with alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 0.42 kg/ha plus a non-toxic oil-surfactant blend gave season-long weed control in sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. rugosa ‘Seneca Chief’). Bioassay with oats (Avena sativa L.) showed no detectable atrazine residue in the soil 3 months after herbicide application. In greenhouse studies, the response of Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv. var. frumentacea) to early postemergence application of atrazine and alachlor combinations plus an oil-surfactant blend was synergistic. Soil uptake played a major role in the activity of the herbicides. Formulants used in commercial alachlor when added to atrazine spray, enhanced atrazine activity in a way similar to that of the non-toxic oil-surfactant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 1975 , pp. 67 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, G.W. 1963. Postemergence application of atrazine in oil-water emulsions. Res. & Rep. Nat'l Weed Com., Eastern Sect. Canada. 21 pp.Google Scholar
2. Bayer, G.H. 1966. 1965 Weed control in field corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:261–266.Google Scholar
3. Currey, W.L. and Cole, R.H. 1966. Comparisons of atrazine, atrazine-surfactant and atrazine-oil mixtures. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:297–300.Google Scholar
4. Dexter, A.G., Burnside, O.C. and Lavy, T.L. 1966. Factors influencing the phytotoxicity of foliar applications of atrazine. Weeds 14:222–228.Google Scholar
5. Dickerson, C.T. Jr. and Sweet, R.D. 1967. Atrazine and oil for postemergence weed control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:106–113.Google Scholar
6. Dickerson, C.T. Jr. and Sweet, R.D. 1968. Atrazine, oil, and 2,4-D for postemergence weed control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 22:64–75.Google Scholar
7. Doty, C.H. and Sweet, R.D. 1972. Yellow nutsedge control as influenced by time of treatment. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:137–145.Google Scholar
8. Eshel, Y. 1969. Phytotoxicity, leachability, and site of uptake of 2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide. Weed Sci. 17:441–444.Google Scholar
9. Hist, L.F. and Ilnicki, R.D. 1970. Combination of alachlor and propachlor with atrazine and linuron for weed control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:41.Google Scholar
10. Hoagland, D.R. and Arnon, D.I. 1950. The water culture method of growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347. Revised by D.I. Arnon.Google Scholar
11. Kenyon, S. and Ball, R.S. 1967. 1966 Weed control trials with silage corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:254–259.Google Scholar
12. Liu, L.C., Ilnicki, R.D., Regan, J.B., and Visinski, E.J. 1966. Naphthenic and paraffinic oils as adjuvants in atrazine and linuron sprays for weed control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:309–316.Google Scholar
13. Lynch, M.R., Sweet, R.D., and Dickerson, C.T. Jr. 1970. Synergistic responses to atrazine in combination with other herbicides – A preliminary report. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:33–38.Google Scholar
14. Nieto, J.H., Brando, M.A., and Gonzalez, J.T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. PANS (c) 14:159–166.Google Scholar
15. Raleigh, S.M. 1967. Grass control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:243–247.Google Scholar
16. Tammes, P.M.L. 1964. Isoboles, a graphic representation of synergism in pesticides. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 70:73–80.Google Scholar
17. Thompson, L. Jr. and Slife, F.W. 1969. Foliar and root absorption of atrazine applied postemergence to giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 17:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Thomson, C.L. 1966. Herbicides for the control of weeds in sweet corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:73–75.Google Scholar
19. Thomson, C.L. 1967. Control of annual weeds in sweet corn 1966. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:114–116.Google Scholar
20. Wilson, H.P. and Waterfield, R.L. 1968. Activity of herbicides in sweet corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 22:47–53.Google Scholar
21. Wilson, H.P., Ilnicki, R.D., Regan, J.B., and Liu, L.C. 1966. Increasing herbicidal effectiveness of atrazine and linuron with surfactants and different spray volumes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 20:301–308.Google Scholar