Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T14:30:39.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Competition in Cotton. II. Cocklebur and Redroot Pigweed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn University Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, Alabama 36830
Earl R. Burns
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Auburn Univ. Coop. Ext. Ser., Auburn, Alabama 36830

Abstract

Competitive effects of cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) were evaluated in four experiments at two locations in Alabama during the period 1966 to 1968. Cocklebur was more competitive with cotton than was pigweed on Norfolk sandy loam soil. A density of eight cocklebur plants per 7.31 m of row reduced cotton yields 20 to 40%. Higher densities of cocklebur resulted in greater yield reductions. Forty-eight cocklebur plants per 7.31 m of row caused cotton yields to be reduced more than 80%. Pigweed at a density of 48 weeds per 7.31 m of row reduced cotton yields less than 50% on the Norfolk soil. On Lucedale sandy clay loam, cocklebur and pigweed were equally competitive and both species were more competitive than on Norfolk soil. A density of eight cocklebur or pigweed plants per 7.31 m of row resulted in 60 to 70% cotton yield reductions. The highest density of pigweed studied, 48 plants per 7.31 m of row, reduced cotton yields 90% on the Lucedale soil. Vegetative growth, boll, and seed size were not affected as much as cotton yields by either weed species. Percentage lint and fiber properties were unaffected by plant competition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19: (In Press).Google Scholar
2. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Rawson, J. E. 1964. Controlling weeds in peanuts. Queensland Agr. J. 90:656661.Google Scholar
4. Smith, D. T. and Tseng, U. H. 1970. Cotton development and yield as related to pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) density. Proc. Cotton Physiology-Defoliation Conf. 24:3738.Google Scholar
5. Waldrep, T. W. and McLaughlin, R. D. 1969. Cocklebur competition in soybeans. The Soybean Farmer 3:2630.Google Scholar