Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:21:27.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uptake, Translocation, and Metabolism of Hexazinone in Blueberry (Vaccinium sp.) and Hollow Goldenrod (Solidago fistulosa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jerry J. Baron
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Thomas J. Monaco
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7609

Abstract

Hexazinone [3-cyclohexyl-6-(dimethylamino)-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione] toxicity, absorption, translocation, metabolism, and effect on photosynthesis were investigated with rooted cuttings of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.), rabbiteye blueberry (V. ashei Reade), and hollow goldenrod (Solidago fistulosa Miller # SOOFI). Highbush and rabbiteye blueberry plants were three times more tolerant to root applications of hexazinone than hollow goldenrod. Blueberry plants absorbed an average of 7.9% of root-applied 14C-hexazinone and hollow goldenrod absorbed an average of 10.1%. An average of 6.8% of root-absorbed hexazinone (14C-label) was translocated from the roots of blueberry to stem and leaves. Radioactivity in hollow goldenrod was distributed equally between roots and shoots. The majority of radioactivity in both species was recovered as hexazinone. Root-absorbed hexazinone caused a rapid inhibition of photosynthesis in intact hollow goldenrod leaves. Root-absorbed hexazinone was capable of inhibiting photosynthesis in intact blueberry leaves; however, this occurred only when roots were exposed to high concentrations of hexazinone.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1982. Mode of action of herbicides. Wiley-Interscience, New York. Pages 341349.Google Scholar
2. Baron, J. J., Monaco, T. J., and Mainland, C. M. 1985. Tolerance of highbush and rabbiteye blueberry cultivars to hexazinone. HortScience 28:10741075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brecke, B. J. 1981. Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control in Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Sci. 29:553555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Beste, C. E., ed. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
5. Esser, H. O., Dupuis, G., Ebert, E., Marco, G., and Vogel, C. 1975. s-Triazines. Pages 130208 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
6. Fitzgerald, C. H. and Fortson, J. C. 1979. Herbaceous weed control with hexazinone in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations. Weed Sci. 27:583588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Freeman, F. W., White, D. P., and Bukovac, M. J. 1964. Uptake and differential distribution of 14C-labeled simazine in red and white pine seedlings. For. Sci. 10:330334.Google Scholar
8. Genez, A. L. and Monaco, T. J. 1983. Uptake and translocation of terbacil in strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa) and goldenrod (Solidago fistulosa). Weed Sci. 31:5662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hatzios, K. K. and Howe, C. M. 1982. Influence of herbicides hexazinone and chlorsulfuron on the metabolism of isolated soybean leaf cells. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
11. Holt, R. F. 1981. Determination of hexazinone and metabolic residues using nitrogen-selective gas chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:165172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Ismail, A. A., Yarborough, D. E., and Skinner, S. P. 1983. Response of weeds and lowbush blueberries to hexazinone and nitrogen application. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:237.Google Scholar
13. Ivany, J. A. 1981. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with fall applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 29:382386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. James, T. K. 1980. Control of weeds in blueberries. Proc. 33d. New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conf. Pages 122124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. McNeil, W. K., Stritzke, J. F., and Basler, E. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and degradation of tebuthiuron and hexazinone in woody species. Weed Sci. 32:739743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Reiser, R. W., Belasco, I. R., and Rhodes, R. C. 1983. Identification of metabolites of hexazinone by mass spectrometry. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 10:581585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Sikka, H. C. and Davis, D. E. 1968. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of prometryne in cotton and soybean. Weed Sci. 16:474477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sung, S. S., South, D. B., and Gjerstad, D. H. 1985. Bioassay indicates a metabolite of hexazinone affects photosyntheisis of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Weed Sci. 33:440442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar