Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:48:54.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature Effects on Vegetative Growth of Round-Leaved Mallow (Malva pusilla)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw
Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vegetative growth response of round-leaved mallow to various day/night temperature regimes was studied under controlled-environment conditions to predict its potential geographic distribution and to develop an effective control program. Round-leaved mallow dry matter production was greatest with day temperatures of 18 to 26 C. Dry matter accumulation was reduced by a night temperature of 6 C but was minimally affected by night temperatures ranging from 12 to 24 C. Regression analysis predicted minimal vegetative growth at mean daily temperatures below 8 C and above 30 C, with optimum growth at 20 C. Partitioning of round-leaved mallow biomass in leaves, stems, and roots was affected by temperature. Maximum leaf weight ratio occurred at low temperatures, 10 C day and 6 C night. Stem weight ratio was greatest at a day temperature of 26 C, with night temperature having little effect. Maximum root biomass occurred with a day temperature of 18 C. Results are discussed in terms of environmental conditions that allow round-leaved mallow to be an effective competitor with crops and potential approaches for its control.

Keywords

Round-leaved mallow, Malva pusilla Sm. ♯ MALPUBiomass partitioningecological rangegrowth analysisweed biologyMALPU
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 63 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1990. Alberta cereals and oilseeds crop protection survey. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 7000-113 St., Edmonton, AB. 55 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1994. Pages 31–161 in Crop protection with chemicals. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 7000-113 St., Edmonton. AB.Google Scholar
3. Berkowitz, A. R. 1988. Competition for resources in weed-crop mixtures. Pages 90–119 in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press. Inc., Boca Raton. FL.Google Scholar
4. Blackshaw, R. E. 1990. Influence of soil temperature, soil moisture, and seed burial depth on the emergence of round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla). Weed Sci. 38: 518–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chen, T.M., Brown, R. H., and Black, C. C. 1970. CO2 compensation concentration, rate of photosynthesis, and carbonic anhydrase activity of plants. Weed Sci. 18: 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Pages 219–220 in Applied regression analysis. Second edition. John Wiley and Sons. New York.Google Scholar
7. Friesen, L. F., Nickel, K. P., and Morrison, I. N. 1992. Round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla) growth and interference in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and flax (Linum usitatissimum). Weed Sci. 40: 448–454.Google Scholar
8. Joenje, W. and Kropff, M. J. 1987. Pages 971–978 in Factors in crop-weed competition. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds.Google Scholar
9. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P. Necas, J. and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343–391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. W. Junk Publ., The Hague.Google Scholar
10. Larcher, W. 1975. Pages 46–53 in Physiological plant ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
11. Makowski, R. M. D. 1987. The evaluation of Malva pusilla Sm. as a weed and its pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Sacc. f. sp. malvae as a bioherbicide. , Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK. 225 pp.Google Scholar
12. Makowski, R. M. D. and Morrison, I. N. 1989. The biology of Canadian weeds. 91. Malva pusilla Sm. (=M. rotundifolia L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 69: 861–879.Google Scholar
13. O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33: 498–503.Google Scholar
14. Patterson, D. T. 1985. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. Pages 101–129 in Duke, S. O. ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. 1. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
15. SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. Pages 891–896 in SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6. Vol. 2. Fourth edition. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
16. Steel, R. D. G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Pages 336–472 in Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
17. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1987. Pages 15–43 in Weed survey of Saskatchewan cereal and oilseed crops 1986. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. No. 87-1. Agric. Canada. Regina, SK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1988. Pages 22–68 in Weed survey of Manitoba cereal and oilseed crops 1986. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. No. 88-1. Agric. Canada. Regina, SK.Google Scholar