Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T12:27:25.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Effects on Growth and Leaf Production in Three Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Elizabeth P. Flint
Affiliation:
Duke Univ. Phytotron, Durham, NC 27706
David T. Patterson
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Durham, NC 27706
David A. Mortensen
Affiliation:
Bot. Dep., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
George H. Riechers
Affiliation:
Bot. Dep., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
Jan L. Beyers
Affiliation:
Bot. Dep., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706

Abstract

Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L. ♯6 CASOB), hemp sesbania [Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Cory ♯ SEBEX], and showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis Roth. ♯ CVTSP) were grown in controlled-environment greenhouses with day/night temperatures of 23/17, 26/20, 29/23, and 32/26 C. Plant height, leaf area, and total dry weight at 53 days after planting increased significantly with temperatures between 23/17 and 29/23 C in sicklepod and showy crotalaria, and between 23/17 and 32/26 C in hemp sesbania. In all species, leaves were produced more rapidly as temperature increased. Axillary branch leaf production was greatest at 29/23 C in sicklepod, and at 29/23 and 26/20 C in showy crotalaria; hemp sesbania showed little axillary branch development. Total dry-matter production in all species was closely correlated with leaf area duration, but not with net assimilation rate. Differences in total main stem leaf area in all species were primarily due to differences in leaf number rather than to differences in leaf size at maturity.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Creel, J. M. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dennett, M. D. and Auld, B. A. 1980. The effects of position and temperature on the expansion of leaves of Vicia faba L. Ann. Bot. 46:511517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Duke, J. A. 1981. Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Importance. Plenum Press, New York. 345 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Egley, G. H. 1979. Seed coat impermeability and germination of showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis) seeds. Weed Sci. 27:355361.Google Scholar
5. Hackett, C. and Rawson, H. M. 1974. An exploration of the carbon economy of the tobacco plant. II. Patterns of leaf growth and dry matter partitioning. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1:271281.Google Scholar
6. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. No. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
7. Johnston, S. K., Walker, R. H., and Murray, D. S. 1979. Germination and emergence of hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata). Weed Sci. 27:290293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
9. McKee, R. and Enlow, C. R. 1931. Crotalaria, a new legume for the South. U.S. Dep. Agric. Circ. No. 137 (Feb. 1931), Washington, DC. 31 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Milthorpe, F. L. 1959. Studies on the expansion of the leaf surface. I. The influence of temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 10:233249.Google Scholar
11. Palmer, R. D. 1980. Category 1. Weed survey. Southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:165197.Google Scholar
12. Patterson, D. T. 1982. Effects of shading and temperature on showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectabilis). Weed Sci. 30:692697.Google Scholar
13. Patterson, D. T., Musser, R. L., Flint, E. P., and Eplee, R. E. 1982. Temperature responses and potential for spread of witchweed (Striga lutea) in the United States. Weed Sci. 30:8793.Google Scholar
14. Pearson, C. J. and Hunt, L. A. 1972. Effects of temperature on primary growth of alfalfa. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:10071015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Rawson, H. M., Constable, G. A., and Howe, G. N. 1980. Carbon production of sunflower cultivars in field and controlled environments. II. Leaf growth. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 7:575586.Google Scholar
16. Rawson, H. M. and Hindmarsh, J. H. 1982. Effects of temperature on leaf expansion in sunflower. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9:209219.Google Scholar
17. Sionit, N., Mortensen, D. A., Strain, B. R., and Hellmers, H. 1981. Growth response of wheat to CO2 enrichment and different levels of mineral nutrition. Agron. J. 73:10231027.Google Scholar
18. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. Pages 248252.Google Scholar
19. Steer, B. T. 1971. The dynamics of leaf growth and photosynthetic capacity in Capsicum frutescens L. Ann. Bot. 35:10031015.Google Scholar
20. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:6871.Google Scholar
21. Wilbur, R. L. 1963. The leguminous plants of North Carolina. N.C. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. No. 151. 294 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar