Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:54:32.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suppression of Pea (Pisum sativum) Root Rot by Dinitroaniline Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. R. Teasdale ,
R. G. Harvey  and
D. J. Hagedorn
J. R. Teasdale
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. G. Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
D. J. Hagedorn
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nine substituted dinitronaline herbicides were studied to determine their effectiveness in controlling common root rot of peas (Pisum sativum L.) caused by Aphanomyces euteiches Drechs. under field conditions. Most of the dinitroaniline herbicide treatments increased plant stand, plant fresh weight, and shelled pea yield due to root rot suppression in each of the three years studied. Weed control was good in all plots and did not contribute to yield differences. Root rot suppression and crop injury were the primary determinants of yields. The greatest yield increases when compared with the weeded control were 82% for 0.56 kg/ha of dinitramine (N4,N4-diethyl-α,α,α-trifluoro-3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine) in 1974, 80% for 0.84 kg/ha of fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) aniline] in 1975, and 26% for 1.68 kg/ha of pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] in 1976. The best average yield increases over all years were 54% for the combination of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) and oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide) at 0.56 + 0.56 kg/ha, 49% for fluchloralin at 0.84 kg/ha, and 43% for pendimethalin at 0.84 kg/ha. Annual applications of 0.84 kg/ha of trifluralin delayed the rate of pathogen infestation of a field repeatedly planted to peas.

Keywords

DiseasefungusAphanomyces euteiches
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 6 , November 1978 , pp. 609 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buczacki, S. T. 1973. The effects of trifluralin and related dinitroaniline herbicides on clubroot of Brassicas. Ann. Appl. Biol. 75:25–30.Google Scholar
2. Burke, D. W., Hagedorn, D. J., and Mitchell, J. E. 1970. Soil Conditions and distribution of pathogens in relation to pea root rot in Wisconsin soils. Phytopathology 60:403–406.Google Scholar
3. Grau, C. R. and Reiling, T. P., 1977. Effect of trifluralin and dinitramine on Aphanomyces root rot of pea. Phytopathology 67:273–276.Google Scholar
4. Grinstein, A., Katan, J., and Eshel, Y. 1976. Effect of dinitroaniline herbicides on plant resistance to soilborne pathogens. Phytopathology 66:517–522.Google Scholar
5. Hagedorn, D. J., Holm, L. G., and Torrie, J. H. 1955. Yield-quality relationships as influenced by maturity of canning peas. Res. Bull. No. 187, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison. 17 pp.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G. and Gritton, E. T. 1977. Susceptibility of pea cultivars to trifluralin. Weed Sci. 25:23–26.Google Scholar
7. Harvey, R. G., Gritton, E. T., and Doersch, R. E. 1972. Effects of selected herbicides on annual weed control and production of processing peas. Agron. J. 64:812–815.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G., Hagedorn, D. J., and De Loughery, R. L. 1975. Influence of herbicides on root rot in processing peas. Crop Sci. 15:67–71.Google Scholar
9. Harvey, R. G. and Jacques, G. L. 1977. Dinitroaniline herbicides for weed control in peas. Weed Sci. 25:256–259.Google Scholar
10. Katan, J. and Eshel, Y. 1973. Interactions between herbicides and plant pathogens. Residue Rev. 45:145–177.Google Scholar
11. Neubauer, R. and Avizohar-Hershenson, Z. 1973. Effect of the herbicide, trifluralin, on Rhizoctonia disease in cotton. Phytopathology 63:651–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Papavizas, G. C. and Ayers, W. A. 1974. Aphanomyces species and their root diseases in pea and sugar beet. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1485. 158 pp.Google Scholar
13. Sherwood, R. T. and Hagedorn, D. J. 1958. Determining the common root rot potential of pea fields. Wisconsin Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 531. 12 pp.Google Scholar
14. Sumner, D. R. 1974. Interaction of herbicides and nematicides with root diseases of snapbean and southern pea. Phytopathology 64:1353–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wyse, D. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of herbicides on the development of root rot on navy bean. Weed Sci. 24:11–15.Google Scholar