Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:55:13.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Effects of CGA-131036 and Chlorsulfuron on Spring-Sown Rotational Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George H. Friesen
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Morden, MB, Canada, R0G 1J0
David A. Wall
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Morden, MB, Canada, R0G 1J0

Abstract

Response of flax, canola, field pea, sunflower, field corn, lentils, and common buckwheat to soil residues of CGA-131036 and chlorsulfuron applied at 22 g ai ha–1 was determined on two soil types at Morden, Manitoba. on a fine sandy loam with a pH of 7.4 and 4.5% organic matter, the length of time required before crops showed no phytotoxicity from CGA-131036 residues was: sunflower 4 yr; canola and common buckwheat 3 yr; flax 2 yr; field pea and field corn 1 yr. on a clay loam with a pH of 6.5 and 5.3% organic matter, the corresponding duration was: lentil, canola, and sunflower 3 yr; flax and field pea 1 yr. Chlorsulfuron residues persisted somewhat longer than CGA-131036 residues on the sandy loam but not on the clay loam.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. 1988. Fall-applied herbicides in chemical fallow — Minot, 1988. Res. Rep., North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 45:374.Google Scholar
2. Ambein, J. and Gerber, H. R. 1985. CGA-131036: A new herbicide for broadleaved weed control in cereals. Proc. 1985 Br. Crop Prot. Conf. — Weeds 1:5562.Google Scholar
3. Blackshaw, R. E. 1988. Soil applied CGA-131036 (triasulfuron) use in cereals. Res. Rep., Expert Committee on Weeds (West. Sect.) 2:466468.Google Scholar
4. Blair, A. M. and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 22:195219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotational crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861865.Google Scholar
6. Fredrickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:328332.Google Scholar
7. Ivany, J. H. 1987. Chlorsulfuron use in barley and residual effect on potato and rutabaga grown in rotation. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:337341.Google Scholar
8. Joshi, M. M., Brown, H. M., and Rommesser, J. A. 1985. Degradation of chlorsulfuron by soil microorganisms. Weed Sci. 33:888893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kirkland, K. J. 1988. The comparative effects of residual chlorsulfuron and triasulfuron 24 months following applications. Res. Rep., Expert Committee on Weeds (West. Sect.) 3:266.Google Scholar
10. Manitoba Agriculture. 1990. Guide to chemical weed control. 908 Norquay Bldg., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3C 0P8.Google Scholar
11. Merci, W. and Foy, C. L. 1985. Phytotoxicity and adsorption of chlorsulfuron as affected by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:564568.Google Scholar
12. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Weed control in fallow with chlorsulfuron. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:56.Google Scholar
13. Moyer, J. R. and Bergen, P. 1988. Tolerance of a variety of crops to residues of DPX-A7881, chlorsulfuron, CGA-131036, imazethapyr and clopyralid. Res. Rep., Expert Committee on Weeds (West Sect) 3:279.Google Scholar
14. Moyer, J. R., Esau, R., and Kozub, G. D. 1990. Chlorsulfuron persistence and response of nine rotational crops in alkaline soils in southern Alberta. Weed Technol. 4:543548.Google Scholar
15. O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Response of various broadleaved weeds and tolerance of cereals to soil and foliar applications of DPX 4189. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:715724.Google Scholar
16. Palm, H. L., Riggleman, J. D., and Allison, D. A. 1980. Worldwide review of a new cereal herbicide — DPX 4189. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds. Pages 14.Google Scholar
17. Peterson, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1986. Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:131136.Google Scholar
18. Royuela, M., Munoz-Rueda, A., and Gonzalez-Murua, C. 1990. Performance and soil persistence of chlorsulfuron when used for wheat production in Spain. Weed Sci. 38:546552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sharma, M. P. and Stewart, R. 1988. Carryover of triasulfuron (CGA-131036) in soil one year after application. Res. Rep., Expert Committee on Weeds (West. Sect.) 3:287.Google Scholar
20. Smith, A. E. and Hsiao, A. I. 1985. Transformation and persistence of chlorsulfuron in prairie soils. Weed Sci. 33:555557.Google Scholar
21. Thirunarayanan, K. R., Zimdahl, L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558563.Google Scholar
22. Walkof, K. D. 1988. The effect of CGA-131036 soil carry-over on alternate crops. Res. Rep., Expert Committee on Weeds (West. Sect.) 3:293297.Google Scholar
23. Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulphonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251256.Google Scholar
24. Willick, J. and Wallace, T. D. 1988. Pre-emergent broad-leaved weed control in cereals with CGA-131036. Res. Rep., Expert Committee on Weeds (West. Sect.) 2:465468.Google Scholar
25. Wondimagegnehu, M. and Foy, C. L. 1985. Phytotoxicity and absorption of chlorsulfuron as affected by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:564568.Google Scholar