Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T19:35:20.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant Succession Following Control of Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) with Picloram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Raymond A. Evans  and
James A. Young
Raymond A. Evans
Affiliation:
Range Sci., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512
James A. Young
Affiliation:
Range Sci., U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., 920 Valley Road, Reno, NV 89512
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 7-yr study was conducted to investigate successional dynamics of herbaceous vegetation after control of western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis Hook.) trees with picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) pellets. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum L. # BROTE) rapidly dominated areas under dead tree canopies with an accompanying yield increase from almost none to about 1400 kg/ha within 4 yr after treatment. In the interstitial zone between tree canopies, a dramatic shift in herbaceous species occurred with tree control. Annual broadleaf species decreased, downy brome increased, and medusahead [Taeniatherum asperum (Sim.) Nevski # ELYCM] gradually became dominant. Total yield of herbaceous vegetation in the interstitial zone increased dramatically after picloram treatment, especially where few shrubs occurred. Available soil moisture, litter accumulation and decay after picloram treatment, and N in the surface layer of the soil affected responses of herbaceous vegetation, especially under dead tree canopies. Responses of annual weedy species to western juniper control emphasize the need for comprehensive manipulation of all components of the vegetation when range improvement is attempted.

Keywords

Bromus tectorumTaeniatherum asperumecologyrange improvementBROTE
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 63 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arnold, S. R., Jameson, D. A., and Reid, E. H. 1964. The pinyon-juniper type of Arizona: Effects of grazing, fire, and tree control. U.S. Dep. Agric. Proj. Res. Rep. 84. 28 pp.Google Scholar
2. Bremer, S. M. and Mulvaney, C. A. 1982. Permanganate-reduced iron modification of Kjeldahl method to include nitrate and nitrite. Pages 619–626 in Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Am. Assoc. Agron. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
3. Evans, R. A. and Love, R. M. 1957. The step-point method of sampling–a practical tool in range research. J. Range Manage. 10:208–212.Google Scholar
4. Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1970. Plant litter and establishment of alien annual weed species in rangeland communities. Weed Sci. 18:697–703.Google Scholar
5. Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1977. Weed control-revegetation systems for big sagebrush-downy brome rangelands. J. Range Manage. 30:331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Johnsen, T. N. Jr. 1962. One-seed juniper invasion of northern Arizona Grasslands. Ecol. Monogr. 32:187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1981. Demography and fire history of a western juniper stand. J. Range Manage. 34:501–506.Google Scholar
8. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., Budy, J. D., and Torell, Allen. 1982. Cost of controlling maturing western juniper trees. J. Range Manage. 35:437–442.Google Scholar
9. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Palmquist, D. E. 1984. Stem flow on western juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) trees. Weed Sci. 32:320–327.Google Scholar