Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:52:08.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence and Movement of Ten Herbicides in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. H. Miller ,
P. E. Keeley ,
R. J. Thullen  and
C. H. Carter
J. H. Miller
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
P. E. Keeley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
R. J. Thullen
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
C. H. Carter
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Shafter, CA 93263
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ten herbicides were each applied at two rates to Panache loam for 5 or 6 yr as soil-incorporated broadcast sprays directed to the base of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala SJ-1’) at last cultivation. Chemical determinations 6 months after annual treatment showed that trifluralin (a,a,a-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), nitralin [4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylaniline], benefin (N-butyl-N-ethyl-a,a,a-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine), DCPA (dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate), and prometryn [2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine] residues were essentially confined to the tilled zone of soil; whereas, bensulide [O,O-diisopropyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with N-(2-mercapteothyl)benzenesulfonamide], fluometuron [1,1-dimethyl-3-(a,a,a,-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea], linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea], and diuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] residues were found below the tilled zone. At time of retreatment, annual residue determinations from the upper 15 cm of soil showed that nitralin and prometryn had dissipated completely and residues of the other herbicides and were notably reduced as compared to levels at cotton harvest. One year after final treatment herbicide residues below the tilled zone were essentially nondetectable, except for diuron, linuron, and fluometuron. There was no evidence of herbicide accumulation in soil with repeated applications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 20 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. P., Richards, A. B., and Whitworth, J. W. 1968. Leaching of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin in soil columns. Weed Sci. 16:165–169.Google Scholar
2. Arle, H. F., Miller, J. H., and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Disappearance of herbicides from irrigated soils. Weeds 13:56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bryant, T. A. and Andrews, H. 1967. Disappearance of diuron, norea, linuron, trifluralin, diphenamid, DCPA, and prometryne from soil. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 20:395–404.Google Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. 1974. Trifluralin dissipation in soil following repeated annual applications. Weed Sci. 22:374–377.Google Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., Wicks, G. A., and Drew, J. V. 1969. Effect of soil and climate on herbicide dissipation. Weed Sci. 17: 241–245.Google Scholar
6. Buxton, R. W., Ja, W. Y., and McKay, J. C. 1966. Prefar. Pages 672–678 in Zweig, Gunter ed. Analytical methods for pesticides, plant growth regulators, and food additives. Vol. 6, Academic Press, N.Y. Google Scholar
7. Dalton, R. L., Evans, A. W., and Rhodes, R. C. 1966. Disappearance of diuron from cotton field soils. Weeds 14:31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Dawson, J. H., Burns, V. F., and Clore, W. J. 1968. Residual monuron, diuron, and simazine in a vineyard soil. Weed Sci. 16:63–65.Google Scholar
9. Dubey, H. D. and Freeman, J. F. 1965. Leaching of linuron and diphenamid in soils. Weeds 13:360–362.Google Scholar
10. Fryer, J. D. and Kirkland, K. 1970. Field experiments to investigate long-term effects of repeated applications of MCPA, tri-allate, simazine and linuron: Report after 6 years. Weed Res. 10:133–158.Google Scholar
11. Hamilton, K. C. and Arle, H. F. 1972. Persistence of herbicides in fallow desert cropland. Weed Sci. 20:573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Harris, C. I. 1967. Movement of herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:214–216.Google Scholar
13. Helpert, C. W., Ketchersid, M. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1972. Persistence of ten substituted dinitroaniline herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:41.Google Scholar
14. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104.Google Scholar
15. Horowitz, M. 1969. Evaluation of herbicide persistence in soil. Weed Res. 9:314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Horowitz, M., Blumefeld, T., Herzlinger, G., and Hulin, Nira. 1974. Effects of repeated applications of ten soil-active herbicides on weed population, residue accumulation and nitrification. Weed Res. 14:97–109.Google Scholar
17. Ivey, M. J. and Andrews, H. 1965. Leaching of simazine, atrazine, diuron and DCPA in soil columns. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 18: 670–684.Google Scholar
18. Koren, E. 1972. Leaching of trifluralin and oryzalin in soil with three surfactants. Weed Sci. 20:230–232.Google Scholar
19. Mattson, A. M., Kahrs, R. A., and Murphy, R. T. 1970. Quantitative determination of triazine herbicide in soils by chemical analysis. Pages 371–390 in Gunther, Francis A. ed. Residue Reviews. Vol. 32. The Triazine Herbicides. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
20. Menges, R. M. and Hubbard, J. L. 1970. Selectivity, movement, and persistence of soil-incorporated herbicides in carrot plantings. Weed Sci. 18:247–252.Google Scholar
21. Menges, R. M. and Tamez, S. 1974. Movement and persistence of bensulide and trifluralin in irrigated soil. Weed Sci. 22:67–71.Google Scholar
22. Miller, J. H., Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. J. 1975. Soil persistence of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 23: 211–214.Google Scholar
23. Palmer, R. D., Reeves, B. G., and Merkle, M. G. 1968. Fall application of trifluralin and nitralin for cotton and soil residues. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 21:67–74.Google Scholar
24. Parka, S. J. and Tepe, J. B. 1969. Disappearance of trifluralin from field soils. Weed Sci. 17:119–122.Google Scholar
25. Pease, Harlan L. 1962. Separation and colorimetric determination of monuron and diuron residues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 10:279–281.Google Scholar
26. Rodgers, E. G. 1968. Leaching of seven s-triazines. Weed Sci. 16: 117–120.Google Scholar
27. Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Atrazine degradation in two soil profiles. Weed Sci. 17:202–205.Google Scholar
28. Savage, K. E. 1973. Nitralin and trifluralin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 21:285–288.Google Scholar
29. Schweizer, E. E. and Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1966. Persistence of five cotton herbicides in four southern soils. Weeds 14:22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Shahied, S. and Andrews, H. 1966. Leaching of trifluralin, linuron, prometryne and cotoran in soil columns. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 19:522–534.Google Scholar
31. Sheets, T. J. 1964. Review of disappearance of substituted urea herbicides from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 12:30–33.Google Scholar
32. Upchurch, R. P., Corbin, F. T., and Selman, F. L. 1969. Persistence pattern for diuron and linuron in Norfolk and Duplin sandy loam soils. Weed Sci. 17:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Weed Science Society of America. 1974. Herbicide Handbook, 3rd ed. 430 pp.Google Scholar
34. Wiese, A. F., Chenault, E. W., and Hudspeth, E. B. Jr. 1969. Incorporation of preplant herbicides for cotton. Weed Sci. 17:481–483.Google Scholar