Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:31:03.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dennis G. Riley  and
David R. Shaw
Dennis G. Riley
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate postemergence combinations of imazethapyr, imazquin, or chlorimuron with low rates of imazapyr for Johnsongrass and pitted morningglory control. Imazapyr applied alone at rates up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no control of either weed species. However, the addition of imazapyr to various rates of imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased both johnsongrass and pitted morningglory control 8 weeks after treatment. The rates of imazethapyr or imazaquin required for significant enhancement of johnsongrass control were higher than those required for pitted morningglory control. No synergistic increases in control of either weed species were noted with mixtures of imazapyr and chlorimuron. Although not synergistic in every case, the mixtures of imazapyr at 4 g/ha with imazethapyr, imazaquin, or chlorimuron gave johnsongrass and pitted morningglory control equal to or better than the next higher rate of these herbicides applied alone. Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, ethyl 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonyl] benzoate-, imazapyr, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-lH-imidazol-2-yl] - 3-quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, (±)-2- [4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl] -5-ethyl-pyridinecarboxylic acidjohnsongrassSorghum halepense (L.) Pers. #3 SORHApitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA, soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrSynergismSORHAIPOLA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 663 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrett, M. and Olson, G. L. 1985. Critical rainfall periods for postemergence johnsongrass control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:453.Google Scholar
2. Bloodworth, L. H. and Shaw, D. R. 1987. Morningglory control in a wheat-soybean double crop system. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:41.Google Scholar
3. Chaleff, R. S. and Mauvais, C. J. 1984. Acetolactate synthase is the site of action of the herbicides chlorsulfuron and sulfometuron methyl in higher plants. Science 224:1443–1445.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
5. Culbertson, D. L., Frans, R. E., and Oliver, L. R. 1987. The efficacy of chlorimuron as influenced by application rate and stage of growth. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:93.Google Scholar
6. Dale, J. E. 1981. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans. Weed Sci. 29:708–711.Google Scholar
7. Elmore, C. D. 1983. Weed survey – southern states. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 39:136–158.Google Scholar
8. Howe, O. W. III and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) row spacing on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference. Weed Sci. 35:185–193.Google Scholar
9. King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Reduced preemergence herbicide rates in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:29.Google Scholar
10. McClelland, M. R., Oliver, L. R., Mathis, W. D., and Frans, R. E. 1978. Responses of six morningglory (Ipomoea) species to bentazon. Weed Sci. 26:459–464.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1981. The technical and economic effects of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:245–252.Google Scholar
12. Shaner, D. H., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinones – potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.Google Scholar
13. Wang, T., Whatley, L. L., Congleton, W. F., Hackworth, H. M., Dunn, J. C., and Watkins, R. M. 1986. AC 263,499 herbicide: Development status. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:520.Google Scholar
14. Whitwell, T., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and McGuire, J. A. 1985. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence grass herbicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Sci. 33:673–678.Google Scholar
15. Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1987. Influence of inorganic salts and imazapyr on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Tech. 1:328–331.Google Scholar