Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:34:43.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicidal Suppression of Bracken and Effects on Forage Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. C. Robocker
W. C. Robocker*
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Wash. State Univ., Pullman, Washington 99163
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nineteen herbicides in various formulations were tested preemergence and postemergence for control of western bracken (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn var. pubescens Underw.). Excellent suppression was obtained for 1 year with fall applications of granular formulations of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile (dichlobenil) at 6.7 and 10.1 kg/ha, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) at 2.2 kg/ha, and 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba) at 4.5 to 9.0 kg/ha. Bracken recovered rapidly after 1 year of suppression by dichlobenil, but other herbaceous species were killed. Bracken recovered considerably the second growing season after application of picloram or dicamba, although morphological effects were noticeable for 2 to 3 years, particularly from dicamba. No visual injury to grasses was apparent from picloram. Some injury to orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) was noted from dicamba.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , September 1971 , pp. 538 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Braid, K. W. 1934. Bracken as a colonist. Scot. J. Agr. 17:59–70.Google Scholar
2. Braid, K. W. 1947. Bracken control–artificial and natural. J. Brit. Grassland Soc. 2:181–189.Google Scholar
3. Braid, K. W. and Conway, E. 1943. Rate of growth of bracken. Nature 152:750–751.Google Scholar
4. Conway, E. 1956. Effects of gamma-2(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-butyric acid on sporelings of bracken. Nature 177:1088–1089.Google Scholar
5. Conway, E. and Forrest, J. A. 1959. Effect of substituted phenoxy-compounds and other translocated herbicides on the rhizomes of bracken. Nature 184:1416–1418.Google Scholar
6. Cox, H. R. 1915. Eradication of fern from pasture lands. U. S. Dep. Agr. Farmers Bull. 687. 12 p.Google Scholar
7. Erskine, D. S. C. 1968. Experimental work in the chemical control of bracken 1958–1968. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 9:488–492.Google Scholar
8. Fryer, J. D. 1959. Control of bracken with dalapon. Down to Earth 14(4):11–14.Google Scholar
9. Kingsbury, John M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J. 626 p.Google Scholar
10. McCarty, M. K. and Scifres, C. J. 1968. Smooth bromegrass response to herbicides as affected by time of application in relation to nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 16:443–446.Google Scholar
11. McIntyre, G. E. 1962. Preliminary studies on the translocation of 14C-labelled herbicides in bracken (Pteridium aquilinum). Weed Res. 2:51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Mitchell, B. J. 1968. Control of bracken fern with herbicides. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 9:498–501.Google Scholar
13. Tryon, R. M. Jr. 1941. Revision of the genus Pteridium . Rhodora 43:1–31:37–67.Google Scholar
14. Watt, A. S. 1940. Contributions to the ecology of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum). I. The rhizome. New Phyt. 39:401–422.Google Scholar
15. Watt, A. S. 1954. Contributions to the ecology of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum). VI. Frost and the advance and retreat of bracken. New Phyt. 53:117–130.Google Scholar