Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:19:39.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Development of Field Horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George Marshall
George Marshall*
Affiliation:
Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth and development of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L. # EQUAR) was measured outdoors using potted plants grown from one-node rhizome fragments. Shoot growth rate increased slowly after planting in March, accelerating to a maximum during July with maximas for shoot height during August and shoot number in September. Rhizome system growth rates initially followed a similar pattern to that of the shoots achieving a maximum during July. Dry matter accumulated in the rhizomes until October and declined thereafter throughout the winter. Tubers initiated during August grew in size and number until November, well beyond the period of active shoot growth and onset of senescence. The characteristics of the growth and development of field horsetail are discussed in relation to achieving weed control via cultural and herbicide treatments.

Keywords

Growth analysisphysiologyEQUAR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 271 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1962. Atlas of the British Flora. Page 4. T. Nelson and sons, London and Edinburgh.Google Scholar
2. Cloutier, D. and Watson, A. K. 1985. Growth and regeneration of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). Weed Sci. 33:358–365.Google Scholar
3. Davidson, J. D. and Bailey, J. A. (1982). The response of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense) to propyzamide and asulam. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds: 275–279.Google Scholar
4. Duckett, J. G. 1970. Sexual behaviour of the genus Equisetum subgenus Equisetum . Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63:327–352.Google Scholar
5. Duckett, J. G. 1973. The comparative morphology of the gametophytes of the genus Equisetum . Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 66:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Duckett, J. G. and Duckett, A. R. 1980. Reproductive biology and population dynamics of wild gametophytes of Equisetum . Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80:1–40.Google Scholar
7. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Equisetum arvense L. and Equisetum palustre L. Pages 262–268 in The World's Worst Weeds: distribution and biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
8. Kiselev, A. N. and Sinyukov, V. P. 1967. The growth of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) on cultivated and uncultivated fields. Doklady TSKHA-Timiriazevskaia sel'skokhoziaistvennaia akademia. 131:273–277.Google Scholar
9. Marshall, G. 1980. Preliminary studies on the mode of action of glyphosate in field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds: 137–144.Google Scholar
10. Marshall, G. 1984. A review of the biology of Equisetum arvense L. (field horsetail). Aspects of Applied Biology 8, weed control in fruit crops. Pages 26–32.Google Scholar
11. Marshall, G. 1984. A review of the control of Equisetum arvense L. (field horsetail). Aspects of Applied Biology 8, weed control in fruit crops. Pages 33–42.Google Scholar
12. Veerasekaran, P., Kirkwood, R. C., and Fletcher, W. W. 1976. The mode of action of asulam [methyl (4-aminobenzene sulphonyl) carbamate] in bracken. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 73:247–268.Google Scholar
13. Williams, E. D. 1979. Studies on the depth distribution and on the germination and growth of Equisetum arvense L. (field horsetail) from tubers. Weed Res. 19:25–32.Google Scholar
14. Williams, R. D. 1982. Growth and reproduction of Cyperus esculentus L. and Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 22:149–154.Google Scholar