Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:09:55.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination and Maturation of Chenopodium humile L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. S. Jordan  and
V. A. Jolliffe
L. S. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
V. A. Jolliffe
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chenopodium humile L. did not germinate under laboratory conditions while the pericarp was intact. Scarification, leaching, ethanol, gibberellic acid, and thiourea stimulated germination. Germination was enhanced by moderate temperature (30 C), and long days. Factors which stimulated germination shortened the time between planting and maturation under short-day conditions but did not promote flowering which was absent under long-day growing conditions. Water stress did not affect germination but hastened maturation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , May 1970 , pp. 382 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, Robert N., 1968. Gennination and establishment of weeds for experimental purposes. W. F. Humphrey Press, Inc., Geneva, New York. 236 p.Google Scholar
2. Corns, Wm. G., 1960. Effects of gibberellin treatments on germination of various species of weed seeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Crocker, William. 1906. Role of seed coats in delayed germination. Bot. Gaz. 42: 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cumming, Bruce G., 1963. The dependence of germination on photoperiod, light quality, and temperature, in Chenopodium spp. Can. J. Bot. 41:1211–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Everson, Leroy. 1949. Preliminary studies to establish laboratory methods for gennination of weed seeds. Assoc. Offic. Seed Anal. Proc. 39:84–89.Google Scholar
6. Herron, James W., 1953. Study of seed production, seed identification, and seed gennination of Chenopodium spp. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem. 320. 24 p.Google Scholar
7. Hofsten, C. G. Von. 1947. Investigations of gennination biology in some weed species (in Swedish, English summary). Vaxtodling (Uppsala) 2. p. 91#x2013;107.Google Scholar
8. Kolk, Helmut. 1962. Viability and donnancy of dry stored weed seeds. Vaxtodling (Uppsala) 18. 192 p.Google Scholar
9. Kosikova, P. G., 1960. The germination of seeds of several species of weeds and ruderal plants after treatment with solutions of gibberellic acid of various concentrations. Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR Bot. Sci. Sect., Amer. Inst. BioI. Sci. Translation. 130:45–47.Google Scholar
10. Lauer, Else. 1953. Uber die Keimtemperatur von Ackerunkrautem und deren Einfluss auf die Zusammensetzung von Unkrautgesellschaften. Flora AUg. Bot. Zeit. 140:551–595.Google Scholar
11. Maguire, Jamfs D. and Overland, Alvin. 1959. Laboratory germination of seeds of weedy and native plants. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 349. 15 p.Google Scholar
12. Martin, John N., 1943. Gennination studies of the seeds of some common weeds. Iowa Acad. Sci. Proc. 50:221–228.Google Scholar
13. Munz, Philip A., 1959. A California Flora. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. 1681 p.Google Scholar
14. Robinson, Benjamin Lincoln and Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1908. Grays' New Manual of Botany. American Book Company. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago. 926 p.Google Scholar
15. Yamada, Iwao. 1954. On the dormancy of weed seeds. I. Effect of thiourea on breaking of dormancy (in Japanese, Enghsh summary). Hokkaido Nat. Agr. Exp. Sta. (Sapporo) Res. Bull. 67:58–62.Google Scholar