Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:57:31.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic structure and mating system of Italian Xanthium strumarium complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Giovanni Dinelli ,
Alessandra Bonetti  and
Pasquale Viggiani
Alessandra Bonetti
Affiliation:
Department of Agro-Environmental Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Via Filippo Re 6/8, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
Pasquale Viggiani
Affiliation:
Department of Agro-Environmental Science and Technology, University of Bologna, Via Filippo Re 6/8, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genetic variation at 12 isozyme loci was investigated in the three species (Xanthium italicum, X. strumarium, and X. orientale) forming a X. strumarium complex in Italy. Very little variation was found within species at the loci studied in contrast to the considerable interspecies genetic differentiation at several loci. The gene differentiation between species was ranged from 61 to 91%. The observed genetic structure of the X. strumarium complex was consistent with that found for predominantly autogamous species. The values of maximum outcrossing rates estimated in original sampling sites and in a field test ranged from 8 to 17%, confirming previous observations that Xanthium species are predominantly self-pollinated. Gene duplications were evident in the three Xanthium species because of their likely polyploid origin. The percentage of duplicate loci exhibiting “fixed heterozygosity” was 25, 25, and 16% in X. italicum, X. strumarium, and X. orientale, respectively. Data presented supported that both mating system and ploidy level were fundamental features in adaptation process of investigated Xanthium species. Some evidence suggested that polyploidization occurred before speciation of X. italicum, X. strumarium, and X. orientale. As a consequence, a common ancestral progenitor could be postulated for the three species. During geographical adaptation, the three species fixed alternative alleles in some loci, and the process was favored by the predominantly autogamous mating system. On the contrary, fixed heterozygosity in duplicated loci allowed maintenance of a sufficient level of gene diversity in the three Xanthium species to ensure wide adaptability in different microhabitats (i.e., abandoned land, roadsides, and field crops) and to avoid the negative effect of inbreeding depression.

Keywords

Xanthium strumarium L. complex XANSTGenetic diversitymating systempolyploidism
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , February 2003 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baldoni, G., Viggiani, P., Bonetti, A., Dinelli, G., and Catizone, P. 2000. Classification of Italian Xanthium strumarium complex based on biological traits, electrophoretic analysis and response to maize interference. Weed Res. 40:191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S.C.H. and Husband, B. C. 1990. The genetics of plant migration and colonization. Pages 254–277 In Brown, A.H.D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., and Weir, B. S., eds. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Pittsburg, MA: Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
Barrett, S.C.H. and Richardson, H. J. 1985. Genetic attributes of invading species. Pages 21–33 In Groves, H. H. and Burdon, J. J., eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions: An Australian Perspective. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra: Jacaranda.Google Scholar
Blais, P. A. and Lechowicz, M. J. 1989. Variation among population of Xanthium strumarium (Compositae) from natural and ruderal habitats. Am. J. Bot. 76:901–908.Google Scholar
Brown, A.H.D. and Burdon, J. J. 1987. Mating systems and colonizing success in plants. Pages 115–131 In Gray, A. J., Cr Wiley, M. J., and Edwards, P. J., eds. Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Brown, A.H.D. and Marshall, D. R. 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants. Pages 351–363 In Scudder, G.E.C. and Reveal, J. L., eds. Evolution Today. Pittsburgh, PA: Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
Ferris, S. D. and Whitt, G. S. 1979. Evolution of the differential regulation of duplicate genes after polyploidization. J. Mol. Evol. 12:267–317.Google Scholar
Fyfe, J. L. and Bailey, N.T.J. 1951. Plant breeding studies in leguminous forage crops. 1. Natural cross-breeding in winter beans. J. Agric. Sci. 41:371–378.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 1:1–46.Google Scholar
Green, A. G., Brown, A.H.D., and Oram, R. N. 1980. Determination of outcrossing in a breeding population of Lupinus albus L. Z. Pflanzenzucht. 84:181–191.Google Scholar
Hamrick, J. L. and Godt, M. J. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. Pages 43–63 In Brown, A.H.D., Clegg, M. T., Kahler, A. L., and Weir, B. S., eds. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Hartl, D. L. 1980. The Hardy-Weinberg law. Pages 93–102 In Harte, D. L. and Clark, A. G., eds. Principles of Population genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Hartl, D. L. 1988. Genetic variation. Pages 72–95 In Hartl, D. L., ed. A Primer of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Hocking, P. J. and Liddle, M. J. 1983. The biology of Australian weeds: 15. Xanthium occidentale Bertol. complex and Xanthium spinosum L. Aust. J. Agric. Sci. 52:191–221.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Holt, J. S. 1986. Isozyme variability and breeding systems in populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34:538–543.Google Scholar
Levin, D. A. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Am. Nat. 122:1–25.Google Scholar
Love, D. and Danserau, P. 1959. Biosystematic studies on xanthium: taxonomic appraisal and ecological traits. Can J. Bot. 37:173–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveless, M. D. and Hamrick, J. L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:65–95.Google Scholar
Martin, R. J. and Carnahan, J. A. 1984. Factors affecting growth and reproduction of Noogoora burr (Xanthium occidentale Bertol.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 35:271–278.Google Scholar
Martinez-Zapater, J. M. and Oliver, J. L. 1985. Isozyme gene duplication in diploid and tetraploid potatoes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70:172–177.Google Scholar
McMillan, C. 1974. Experimental hybridization in Xanthium strumarium of American complexes with diverse photoperiodic adaptations. Can. J. Bot. 52:849–859.Google Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1987. Cockleburs. Weed Technol. 1:359–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montigaud, I. 1997. Un desherbage de plus en plus difficile. Cultivar 417:28–29.Google Scholar
Moran, G. F. and Marshall, D. R. 1978. Allozyme uniformity within and variation between races of the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium L. (Noogoora burr). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 31:283–291.Google Scholar
Moran, G. F., Marshall, D. R., and Muller, W. J. 1981. Phenotypic variation and plasticity of the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium (Noogoora Burr). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 34:639–648.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70:3321–3323.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590.Google Scholar
Roose, M. and Gottlieb, L. D. 1976. Genetic and biochemical consequences of polyploidy in Tragopon. Evolution 30:818–830.Google Scholar
Sun, M. 1997. Genetic diversity in three colonizing orchids with contrasting mating systems. Am. J. Bot. 84:224–232.Google Scholar
Tanskley, S. D. and Orton, T. J. 1983. Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding Part A. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 516 p.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Lechowics, M. J. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 56. Xanthium strumarium L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeden, N. F. and Wendel, J. F. 1990. Genetics of plant isozymes. Pages 46–72 In Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S., eds. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland, OR: Dioscorides.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1969. Evolution of the Genetics of Population. Volume 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar