Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T16:10:10.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foliar Absorption and Translocation of Herbicides from Aqueous Solution and Treated Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Washington State Univ., Prosser, WA 99350
Robert Parker
Affiliation:
Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Washington State Univ., Prosser, WA 99350
E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
Dep. Crops and Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99163

Abstract

It has been suggested that soil treated with a herbicide and subsequently carried by wind and deposited on plant foliage can cause crop injury. This study compared foliar uptake and translocation of herbicides applied to plants as an aqueous solution or in herbicide-treated soil. Leaves of 3-wk-old seedling alfalfa, grape, and pea were treated with 14C-labeled thifensulfuron, chlorsulfuron, glyphosate, 2,4-D, and bromoxynil. Significant amounts of all herbicides were absorbed by pea, alfalfa, and grape from the aqueous solutions, whereas very limited absorption occurred from herbicide-treated soil. Prolonged and multiple exposure to herbicide-treated soil did not increase herbicide uptake. High relative humidity enhanced herbicide absorption from aqueous solutions but not from herbicide-treated soil. All herbicides except bromoxynil were readily translocated in alfalfa, grape, and pea. Limited quantities of herbicides were absorbed from herbicide-treated soil by plant foliage, and this small amount is unlikely to cause crop damage.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brazelton, R. and Akesson, N. B. 1989. Safety and regulation. Pages 199213 in Kurtz, E. A., Colbert, F. O., Lester, D., Lynch, J., Romander, L. L., Stein, A., and Thomson, W. T., eds. Principles of Weed Control in California. Thomson Publications, Fresno.Google Scholar
2. Courshee, R. J. 1960. Some aspects of the application of insecticides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5:327352.Google Scholar
3. Daines, R. H. 1952. 2,4-D as an air pollutant and its effects on various species of plants. Pages 140143 in McCabe, L. C., ed. Air Pollution. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
4. Decker, F. W. and Hennessey, J. P. 1977. Comments on “long-distance transport of 2,4-D”. J. Appl. Meteorol. 16:10031009.Google Scholar
5. Devine, M. D. 1989. Phloem translocation of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:191213.Google Scholar
6. Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Devine, M. D., Bandeen, J. D., and McKersie, B. D. 1983. Temperature effects on glyphosate absorption, translocation, and distribution in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 31:461464.Google Scholar
8. Grimm, E., Neumann, S., and Krug, B. 1987. Transport of xenobiotics in higher plants. IV. Ambimobility of the acidic compounds bromoxynil and pentachlorophenol. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 182:323332.Google Scholar
9. Hance, R. J. 1988. Adsorption and bioavailability. Pages 119 in Grover, R., eds. Environmental chemistry of herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
10. Hull, H. M. 1970. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Residue Rev. 31:1155.Google Scholar
11. Lanphear, F. O. and Soule, S. H. 1970. Injury to city plants from industrial emissions of herbicides. Hortscience 5:215217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Leonard, O. A. and Weaver, R. J. 1961. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and amitrole in shoots of the tokay grape. Hilgardia 31:327368.Google Scholar
13. Matthews, G. A. 1982. Controlled droplet application. Pages 182203 in Pesticide Application Methods. Longman Group Limited, London.Google Scholar
14. Ogg, A. G. and Ahmedullah, A. 1991. Influence of repeated applications of 2,4-D on yield and juice quality of concord grapes (Vitis labruscana). Weed Sci. 39:284295.Google Scholar
15. Olunuga, B. A., Lovell, P. H., and Sagar, G. R. 1977. The influence of plant age on the movement of 2,4-D and assimilates in wheat. Weed Res. 17:213217.Google Scholar
16. Peterson, G. E. 1967. The discovery and development of 2,4-D. Agric. Hist. 41:243253.Google Scholar
17. Price, C. E. 1982. A review of factors influencing the penetration of pesticide through plant leaves. Pages 237252 in Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E., eds. The Plant Cuticle. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
18. Que Hee, S. S., Sutherland, R. G., and Vetter, M. 1975. GLC analysis of 2,4-D concentrations in air samples from central Saskatchewan in 1972. Environ. Sci. Technol. 9:6266.Google Scholar
19. Robbins, W. A. and Taylor, W. S. 1957. Injury to canning tomatoes caused by 2,4-D. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 70:373378.Google Scholar
20. Seiber, J. N., McChesney, M. M., and Woodrow, J. E. 1989. Airborne residues resulting from use of methyl parathion, molinate and thiobencarb on rice in the Sacramento Valley, California. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 8:577588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Sherwood, C. H., Weigle, J. L., and Denisen, E. L. 1970. 2,4-D as an air pollutant: Effects on growth of representative horticultural plants. Hortscience 5:211213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215231.Google Scholar
23. Weigle, J. L., Denisen, E. L., and Sherwood, C. H. 1970. 2,4-D as an air pollutant: Effect on market quality of several horticultural crops. Hortscience 5:213214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar