Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Field evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes for weed competitiveness

  • Alvin J. Bussan, Orvin C. Burnside (a1), James H. Orf (a1), Eric A. Ristau (a1) and Klaus J. Puettmann (a2)...

Abstract

In the first of 2 field studies, weed biomass and soybean seed yield were used to evaluate 16 soybean genotypes for competitive ability against 12 weed species at Rosemount, MN, in 1992 and 1993. The yield and ranking of soybean genotypes often varied with the weed species. Grass weed species reduced yields the most, and small-seeded broadleaf weeds reduced yields the least across years. ‘Parker’ was highly competitive, as it suppressed weed biomass and produced high soybean yield. ‘Kato,’ ‘Kasota,’ ‘Dawson,’ and ‘Glenwood’ minimized weed biomass and maintained soybean yield while in competition with grass weeds but yielded poorly relative to other soybean genotypes in weed-free conditions. ‘Lambert’ produced high soybean yield in weed-free conditions, but yield dropped markedly when in competition with grass weeds. ‘Grande,’ ‘Heifeng 25,’ and ‘Norman’ soybeans were poor competitive genotypes in weedy situations and low yielding in weed-free conditions. A 2nd field study conducted at Rosemount and St. Paul, MN, during 1993 evaluated 16 soybean genotypes under 4 levels and durations of weed pressure for weed competitiveness. Parker, ‘Sturdy,’ and M89-794 were most competitive in suppressing weed biomass and producing high yields. Lambert yielded fairly well but allowed high weed biomass. M89-1743, M89-1006, ‘Archer,’ and ‘Ozzie’ yielded poorly and did not sup press weed biomass production. No relationship was found between weed competitiveness and soybean canopy area, height, and volume measured 30–45 d after planting (DAP).

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Corresponding address: Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706.

References

Hide All
Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20: 294297.
Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27: 562565.
Bussan, A. J. 1995. Selection for weed competitiveness among soybean genotypes. M.S. thesis. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. 108 p.
Callaway, M. B. 1992. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 7: 169180.
Callaway, M. B. and Forcella, F. 1993. Crop tolerance to weeds. in Callaway, M. B. and Francis, C. A., eds. Crop Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 100131.
Coble, H. D. and Ritter, R. L. 1978. Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pennsylvanicum) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26: 556559.
Coble, H. D., Williams, F. M., and Ritter, R. L. 1981. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29: 339342.
Egley, G. H. 1990. High temperature effects on germination and su rvival of weed seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 38: 429435.
Grime, J. P. 1979. Primary strategies in the established phase. in Grime, J. P., ed. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. New York: J. Wiley, pp. 725.
Gunsolus, J. L. 1990. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 5: 114119.
Harrison, J. K. 1990. Interference and seed production by common lambs quarters (Chenopodium album) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38: 113118.
Harrson, S. K., Williams, C. S., and Wax, L. M. 1985. Interference and control of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33: 203208.
Harvey, R. G. and Wagner, C. R. 1994. Using estimates of weed pressure to establish crop yield loss equations. Weed Technol. 8: 114118.
Henry, W. T. and Bauman, T. T. 1989. Interference between soybeans (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) under Indiana field conditions. Weed Sci. 37: 753760.
Johnson, B. J. 1990. Herbicide X annual fertility programs influence on creeping bentgrass performance. Agron. J. 82: 2733.
Kropff, M. J. and Spitters, C.J.T. 1991. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Res. 31: 97105.
Lentner, M. M. and Bishop, T. 1986. In Lentner, M. M. and Bishop, T., eds. Experimental Design and Analysis. Blacksburg, VA: Valley Book, pp. 365371.
Monks, D. W. and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Interactions between soybean (Glycine max) cultivars and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 36: 770776.
Orwick, P. L. and Schrieber, M. M. 1979. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and robust foxtail (Setaria viridis var. robusta alba or var. robusta puprurea) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27: 665674.
Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 32: 638645.
Rose, S. J., Burnside, O. C., Specht, J. E., and Swisher, B. A. 1984. Competition and allelopathy between soybeans and weeds. Agron. J. 76: 523528.
Stoller, E. W. and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33: 199202.
Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Acta Oecol. Scand. 58: 315.
Tilman, D. and Wedin, D. 1991. Dynamics of nitrogen competition be tween successional grasses. Ecology 72: 10381049.
Wyse, D. L. 1994. New technologies and approaches for weed management in sustainable agriculture systems. Weed Technol. 8: 403407.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Science
  • ISSN: 0043-1745
  • EISSN: 1550-2759
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed