Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Factors Affecting Weed Seed Devitalization with the Harrington Seed Destructor

  • Breanne D. Tidemann (a1), Linda M. Hall (a1), K. Neil Harker (a2) and Hugh J. Beckie (a3)

Abstract

The Harrington Seed Destructor (HSD), a novel weed control technology, has been highly effective in Australian cropping systems. To investigate its applicability to conditions in western Canada, stationary threshing was conducted to determine the impact of weed species, seed size, seed number, chaff load, and chaff type on efficacy of seed destruction. Control varied depending on species, with a range of 97.7% to 99.8%. Sieve-sized volunteer canola seed had a linear relationship of increasing control with increasing 1,000-seed weight. However, with greater than 98% control across all tested seed weights, it is unlikely that seed size alone will significantly influence control. Consistently high levels of control were observed at all tested seed densities (10 seeds to 1 million seeds). The response of weed seed control to chaff load was quadratic, but a narrow range of consistently high control (>97%) was again observed. Chaff type had a significant effect on weed seed control (98% to 98.6%); however, seed control values in canola chaff were likely confounded by a background presence of volunteer canola. Overall, the five parameters studied statistically influence control of weed seeds with the HSD. However, small differences between treatments are unlikely to affect the biological impact of the machine, which provides high levels of control for those weed seeds that can be introduced into the harvester.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author’s E-mail: blaturnu@ualberta.ca

Footnotes

Hide All

Associate Editor for this paper: William Vencill, University of Georgia

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (2014) Spoiled Rotten. http://ahri.uwa.edu.au/spoiled-rotten. Accessed: February 21, 2017
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (2015) How Much Does Harvest Weed Seed Control Cost? http://ahri.uwa.edu.au/hwsc-cost. Accessed: February 21, 2017
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (2016) The integrated Harrington Seed Destructor Has Arrived. http://ahri.uwa.edu.au/ihsd. Accessed: February 21, 2017
Berry, NK, Fielke, JM, Saunders, C (2015) A Mastercurve to predict annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed devitalisation when exposed to multiple single sided impacts. Biosys Eng 133:5663
Burton, NR, Beckie, HJ, Willenborg, CJ, Shirtliffe, SJ, Schoenau, JJ, Johnson, EN (2016) Evaluating seed shatter of economically important weed species. Weed Sci 64:673682
Burton, NR, Beckie, HJ, Willenborg, CJ, Shirtliffe, SJ, Schoenau, JJ, Johnson, EN (2017) Seed shatter of six economically important weed species in producer fields in Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 97:266276
Cavalieri, A, Harker, KN, Hall, LM, Willenborg, CJ, Haile, TA, Shirtliffe, SJ, Gulden, RH (2016) Evaluation of the causes of on-farm harvest losses in canola in the Northern Great Plains. Crop Sci 56:20052015
de Bruin Engineering (2017) Integrated Harrington Seed Destructor. http://www.ihsd.com. Accessed: February 21, 2017
Duke, SO (2012) Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Manag Sci 68:505512
Friesen, LF, Beckie, HJ, Warwick, SI, Van Acker, RC (2009) The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Can J Plant Sci 89:141167
Heap, I (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: February 21, 2017
Jacobs, A, Kingwell, R (2016) The Harrington Seed Destructor: its role and value in farming systems facing the challenge of herbicide-resistant weeds. Ag Sys 142:3340
Lacoste, M, Powles, S (2014) Upgrading the RIM model for improved support of integrated weed management extension efforts in cropping systems. Weed Technol 28:703720
Pannell, DJ, Stewart, V, Bennett, A, Monjardino, M, Schmidt, C, Powles, SB (2004) RIM: A bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia. Ag Sys 79:305--325
SAS Institute (1995) SAS Procedures Guide. 3rd edn, Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Pp 617634
Sawma, JT, Mohler, CL (2002) Evaluating seed viability by an unimbibed seed crush test in comparison with the tetrazolium test. Weed Technol 16:781786
Schwartz, LM, Norsworthy, JK, Walsh, MJ (2017) Integrated Harrington Seed Destructor: how effective is it? Paper 291 in Proceedings of the 2017 Weed Science Society of America Annual Meeting. Tucson, AZ: Weed Science Society of America
Tidemann, BD, Hall, LM, Harker, KN, Beckie, HJ, Johnson, EN, Stevenson, FC (2017) Suitability of wild oat (Avena fatua), false cleavers (Galium spurium) and volunteer canola (Brassica napus) for harvest weed seed control in western Canada. Weed Sci (accepted)
Walsh, MJ, Harrington, RB, Powles, SB (2012) Harrington Seed Destructor: a new nonchemical weed control tool for global grain crops. Crop Sci 52:13431347
Walsh, M, Newman, P, Powles, S (2013) Targeting weed seeds in-crop: a new weed control paradigm for global agriculture. Weed Technol 27:431436

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Factors Affecting Weed Seed Devitalization with the Harrington Seed Destructor

  • Breanne D. Tidemann (a1), Linda M. Hall (a1), K. Neil Harker (a2) and Hugh J. Beckie (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.