Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:59:21.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Performance of Preemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. S. Jordan ,
J. M. Lyons ,
W. H. Isom  and
B. E. Day
L. S. Jordan
Affiliation:
University of California, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside, California
J. M. Lyons
Affiliation:
University of California, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside, California
W. H. Isom
Affiliation:
University of California, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside, California
B. E. Day
Affiliation:
University of California, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Riverside, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spray and granular forms of isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)-carbamate (CIPC, ethyl N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC), a,a,a-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) and 2,4-bis(isopropylamino) -6-methylmercapto-s-triazine (prometryne) were incorporated preemergence to barnyardgrass Echinochloa crusgalli (1.) Beauv.) and broadleaf weeds with a rotary tiller, wheel hoe, rotary spike, or row wheel into pre-irrigated or dry soil at three locations. The locations varied in type of soil, climatic conditions, and the species of broadleaf weeds. Rotary tiller incorporation generally resulted in best weed control with both spray and granular forms under all conditions. Herbicides usually performed best in pre-irrigated soil. Sprays and granules were equal in performance at coastal and intermediate locations; granules were more effective in the desert location. Herbicidal effectiveness was influenced by method of incorporation, form of treatment, soil moisture, environmental location, and weed type.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 457 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Antognini, J. 1960. Soil incorporation of herbicides. Proc. California Weed Conf. 12:112–114.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. 1960. The major problem in vegetable crops-weed control. Proc. California Weed Conf. 12:72–74.Google Scholar
3. Ashton, Floyd M. and Dunster, Kenneth. 1961. The herbicidal effect of EPTC, CDEC, and CDAA on Echinochloa crusgalli with various depths of soil incorporation. Weeds 9:312–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bandeen, J. D., Switzer, C. M., and Jones, G. E. 1959. An investigation of preplanting soil incorporation of herbicides for control of weeds in sugar beets. Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Tech. East U. S. and Canada 10:41–44.Google Scholar
5. Barnsley, G. E. and Rosher, P. H. 1961. The relationship between the herbicidal effect of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile and its persistence in the soil. Weed Res. 1:147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Carter, L. M. and Miller, J. H. 1961. Progress report on experimental equipment for soil incorporation of herbicides. Proc. California Weed Conf. 13:78–82.Google Scholar
7. Dawson, J. H. 1963. Development of barnyardgrass seedlings and their response to EPTC in soil. Weeds 11:60–67.Google Scholar
8. Danielson, L. L. and Gentner, W. A. 1964. Influence of air movement on persistence of EPTC in soil. Weeds 12:92–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Foy, C. L. 1954. Effectiveness of isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate as a selective preemergence herbicide in cotton. Weeds 3:282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gray, R. A. 1965. A vapor trapping apparatus for determining loss of EPTC and other herbicides from soils by vaporization. Weeds 13:138–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gray, R. A. and Weierich, A. J. 1965. Factors affecting the vapor loss of EPTC from soils. Weeds 13:141–147.Google Scholar
12. Hauser, E. W. 1965. Preemergence activity of three thiocarbamate herbicides in relation to depth of placement in the soil. Weeds 13:255–257.Google Scholar
13. Jordan, L. S. 1964. Effects of methods of irrigation and incorporation on preemergence herbicides. Proc. California Weed Conf. 16:77–79.Google Scholar
14. Jordan, L. S., Day, B. E., and Clerx, W. A. 1963. Effect of incorporation and method of irrigation on preemergence herbicides. Weeds 11:157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Jordan, L. S., Lyons, J. M., Isom, W. H., Day, B. E., and Mann, J. D. 1965. Factors affecting weed control with soil incorporated herbicides. Proc. WWCC 20:7–9.Google Scholar
16. Kempen, H. M., Miller, J. H., and Carter, L. M. 1963. Preemergence herbicides incorporated in moist soils for control of annual grass and irrigated cotton. Weeds 11:300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kempen, H. M., Carter, C. H., Lange, A. H., Fischer, B. B., and Ford, H. P. 1965. Results with trifluralin in 1964 California cotton. Res. Prog. Rept. WWCC 80–81.Google Scholar
18. Lyons, James M. and Whiting, Fred L. 1965. Incorporated, preemergence, granular herbicides on vegetable crops. Weeds 13:242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. McWhorter, C. G. and Wooten, O. B. 1961. The use of fluorescent tracers to study distribution of soil applied herbicides. Weeds 9:42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Menges, R. M. 1961. The influence of irrigation methods on performance of preemergence herbicide treatments. Proc. SWC 14:317.Google Scholar
21. Miller, J. H., Kempen, H. M., Wilkerson, J. A., and Foy, C. L. 1961. A three year study of residual-type herbicides for control of watergrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) in western irrigated cotton. Weeds 9:373–381.Google Scholar
22. Schwer, J. D. and Parka, S. J. 1964. Variation in herbicidal performance associated with various implements used for soil incorporation. Proc. NCWCC 20:15–17.Google Scholar