Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:44:32.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhanced Phytotoxicity of Bentazon with Organophosphate and Carbamate Insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James R. Campbell
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Pesticide Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Pesticide Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

The organophosphate insecticides, malathion [S-1,2-di (ethoxycarbonyl)ethyl O, O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate], parathion (O, O-diethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate) and diazinon (O,O-diethyl O-2-isopropyl-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl phosphorothioate) combined with bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide], caused severe injury to soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Corsoy′] and navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. 'Seafarer′). Postemergence tank – mixture applications of bentazon with organophosphate or carbamate insecticides, or soil-applied organophosphate insecticides prior to bentazon treatments, did not interact with bentazon to injure corn (Zea mays L. ‘Great Lakes Hybrid 4122′). Technical grade malathion interacted with bentazon to the same extent as formulated malathion. Combination treatments of malathion with bentazon resulted in the same degree of injury whether they were applied as tank mixtures or split applications 48 h apart.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abivardi, C. and Altman, J. 1978. Effect of cyloate and aldicarb alone and in combination on growth of three sugarbeet species (Beta spp.). Weed Sci. 26:161162.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2021.Google Scholar
3. Del Rosario, D. A. and Putnam, A. R. 1973. Enhancement of foliar activity of linuron with carbaryl. Weed Sci. 21:465468.Google Scholar
4. Hamill, A. S. and Penner, D. 1973. Interaction of alachlor and carbofuran. Weed Sci. 21:330335.Google Scholar
5. Hamill, A. S. and Penner, D. 1973. Chlorbromuron-carbofuran interaction in corn and barley. Weed Sci. 21:335338.Google Scholar
6. Hayes, R. M., Yeargan, K. V., Witt, W. W., and Raney, H. G. 1979. Interaction of selected insecticide herbicide combinations on soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 27:5154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. O'Brien, R. D. 1976. Acetylcholinesterase and its inhibition. Page 277 in Wilkinson, C. F., ed., Insecticide Biochemistry and Physiology. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
8. Putnam, A. R. and Penner, D. 1974. Pesticide interactions in higher plants. Residue Rev. 50:73110.Google Scholar
9. Smith, L. W. 1970. Antagonistic responses with combinations of trifluralin and organophosphate insecticides. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 21.Google Scholar
10. Weierich, A. J., Nelson, Z. A., and Appleby, A. P. 1977. Influence of fonofos on the distribution and metabolism of 14C-terbacil in peppermint. Weed Sci. 25:2729.Google Scholar
11. Woldetatios, T. and Harvey, R. G. 1977. Diclofop and bentazon interactions on soybeans and annual weeds. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:4243.Google Scholar
12. Yih, R. Y., McRae, D. H., and Wilson, H. F. 1968. Mechanism of selective action of 3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide. Plant Physiol. 43:12911296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar