Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:45:32.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Application of Herbicides for No-Till Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Stubble

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gail A. Wicks*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Nebraska West Central Res. and Ext. Ctr., North Platte, NE 69101

Abstract

Research on the timing of herbicide application on no-till sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] planted into undisturbed winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble was conducted at North Platte, NE, during 1980–1982. Applying some herbicides 41 and 25 days prior to planting sorghum maintained weed control, reduced sorghum injury, and increased sorghum yields when compared to application at planting. It was necessary to apply cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrile} at 2.7 kg ai/ha 41 days prior to planting to avoid sorghum injury. Metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] + 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 2.2 + 0.3 kg/ha reduced grass yields 97, 98, and 99%, while reduction with alachlor [2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide] + 2,4-D at 2.8 + 0.3 kg/ha was 93, 41, and 63%, respectively, when herbicides were applied 0, 25, and 41 days prior to planting.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Carlson, D. R. 1980. Control of weeds in an oat (Avena sativa)-soybean (Glycine max) ecofarming rotation. Weed Sci. 28:4650.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1982. Weed control in corn planted into untilled winter wheat stubble. Agron. J. 74:521526.Google Scholar
3. Crutchfield, D., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of wheat mulch level on weed control in ecofarming corn production. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. Page 1.Google Scholar
4. Doupnik, B. Jr. and Boosalis, M. G. 1980. Ecofallow – a reduced tillage system–and plant disease. Plant Dis. 64:3135.Google Scholar
5. Ellis, J. F., Peek, J. W., Boehle, J. Jr., and Muller, G. 1980. Effectiveness of a new safener for protecting sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from metolachlor injury. Weed Sci. 28:15.Google Scholar
6. Phillips, W. M. 1964. New technique of controlling weeds in sorghum in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation in the Great Plains. Weeds 12:4244.Google Scholar
7. Ramig, R. E. and Smika, D. E. 1964. Fallow-wheat-sorghum: An excellent rotation for dryland in central Nebraska. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 483.Google Scholar
8. Roeth, F. W., Burnside, O. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1983. Protection of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from chloroacetanilide herbicide injury. Weed Sci. 31:373379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Vander Vorst, P. B., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Weed control in a winter wheat-corn-ecofarming rotation. Agron. J. 75:507511.Google Scholar
10. Wicks, G. A. 1976. Ecofallow: a reduced tillage system for the Great Plains. Weeds Today 7(2):2023.Google Scholar
11. Zimdahl, R. L. and Clark, S. K. 1982. Degradation of three acetanilide herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 30:545548.Google Scholar