Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T16:57:49.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Critical Period of Weed Control in Grain Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael R. Hall ,
Clarence J. Swanton  and
Glenn W. Anderson
Michael R. Hall
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Clarence J. Swanton
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Glenn W. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in southern Ontario to determine the critical period of weed control in grain corn and the influence of weed interference on corn leaf area. The Gompertz and logistic equations were fitted to data representing increasing durations of weed control and weed interference, respectively. The beginning of the critical period varied from the 3- to 14-leaf stages of corn development However, the end of the critical period was less variable and ended on average at the 14-leaf stage. Weed interference reduced corn leaf area by reducing the expanded leaf area of each individual leaf and accelerating senescence of lower leaves. In addition, weed interference up to the 14-leaf stage of corn development impeded leaf expansion and emergence in 1989.

Keywords

CornZea mays (L.)Weed interferencedensitybiomasscrop yield losscorn leaf areaGompertzlogistic
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 441 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1989. Field crop recommendations, publication 296. Ont. Minist. Agric. Food. 91 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1988. Agricultural statistics for Ontario, publication 20. Ont. Minist. Agric. Food. Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
4. Bonilla, J. S. 1984. Critical period of competition between maize and weeds. Centro-Agricola. 11:37–44.Google Scholar
5. Brown, D. M. 1978. Heat units for corn in southern Ontario. Factsheet Agdex 111/31.Google Scholar
6. Cousens, R. 1988. Misinterpretations of results in weed research through inappropriate use of statistics. Weed Res. 28:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dwyer, L. M. and Stewart, D. W. 1986. Leaf area development in field-grown maize. Agron. J. 78:334–343.Google Scholar
8. Elakkad, M. A. 1983. Environmental stresses induced by natural weed infestations and their effects on corn and soybeans. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minnesota. 159 pp.Google Scholar
9. Friesen, G. H., 1978. Weed interference in pickling cucumbers (Cucumis sativus). Weed Sci. 26:626–629.Google Scholar
10. Gleason, L. S. 1956. Weed control in corn in the wet tropics. Proc. NCWCC 13:54.Google Scholar
11. Harris, T. C. and Ritter, R. L. 1987. Giant green foxtail (Setaria viridis var. major) and fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum) competition in soybeans (Glycine max) Weed Sci. 35:663–668.Google Scholar
12. Knake, E. L. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
13. Moxley, J. 1988. Survey of pesticide use in Ontario, 1988. In: Economics Information Report No. 89-08. Ont. Minist. Agric. Food, Toronto. 40 pp.Google Scholar
14. Oliver, L. R. 1988. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technol. 2:398–403.Google Scholar
15. Perry, K. M., Evans, R., and Jeffrey, L. S. 1983. Competition between johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and corn (Zea mays). Page 345 in South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36th annual meeting.Google Scholar
16. Petersen, R. G. 1977. Use and misuse of multiple comparison procedures. Agron. J. 69:205–208.Google Scholar
17. Ratkowsky, D. D. 1990. Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Models. Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
18. Sanderson, J. B., Daynard, T. B., and Tollenaar, M. 1981. A mathematical model of the shape of corn leaves. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:1009–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. C. 1980. Statistical Methods. Iowa State Univ. Press., Ames, IA.Google Scholar
20. Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.Google Scholar
21. Tollenaar, M., Daynard, T. B., and Hunter, R. B. 1979. Effect of temperature on rate of leaf appearance and flowering date in maize. Crop Sci. 19:363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Weaver, S. E. 1984. Critical period of weed competition in three vegetable crops in relation to management practices. Weed Res. 24:317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Weaver, S. E. and Tan, C. S. 1983. Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): growth analysis. Weed Sci. 31:476–481.Google Scholar
24. Wolfe, D. W., Henderson, D. W., Hsiao, T. C., and Alvino, A. 1988a. Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize. I. Leaf area duration, nitrogen distribution and yield. Agron. J. 80:859–864.Google Scholar
25. Wolfe, D. W., Henderson, D. W., Hsiao, T. C., and Alvino, A. 1988b. Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize. II. Photosynthetic decline and longevity of individual leaves. Agron. J. 80:865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Zanin, G., Cantele, A., and Toniolo, L. 1986. Growth analysis parameters for studying weed competition in maize. Page 153–160 in EWRS Symp. on Economic Weed Control. Google Scholar
27. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-Crop Competition—A Review. Int. Plant Prot. Ctr., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. 195 pp.Google Scholar