Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:07:09.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cost of counting and identifying weed seeds and seedlings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lori J. Wiles  and
Edward E. Schweizer
Edward E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Water Management Research Unit, AERC-Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bioeconomic weed management models help growers achieve appropriate weed management with less herbicide by matching management to the weed population in a field. Growers, however, will not use bioeconomic models unless cost-effective methods to sample their weed populations are identified. Counting and identifying seeds and seedlings is the most time-consuming and costly part of sampling weed populations. The time required for this process was investigated and modeled as a first step in developing sampling plans for growers using WEEDCAM, a bioeconomic model for weed management in Zea mays L. in Colorado. The time required to count and identify seeds or seedlings was recorded for 9,405 soil cores (5 cm in diameter and 10 cm deep) and 9,726 quadrats (18-cm band over 1.52 m of crop row) collected or examined in eight corn fields in eastern Colorado. The time required to count and identify seeds was best described using a log-linear regression with time increasing with the number of seeds and species and the amount of sand in the core. The average cost of determining there are no seeds in a core is $1.07 for a core from a field with 37% sand and $4.32 if the field has 88% sand. The average cost of counting and identifying 36 seeds of four species is $2.70 and $10.88 for cores with 37 and 88% sand, respectively. The time required to count and identify seedlings was best described using a log-linear regression with time increasing with the number of seedlings and species. Classifying seedlings as grass or broadleaf did not improve the model. The average cost of determining that a quadrat is weed-free is $0.02. The average cost of counting and identifying 37 seedlings is $0.05, $0.07, $0.19, and $0.26 per quadrat for 1, 2, 4, and 6 species, respectively. The cost of identifying seeds and seedlings in eastern Colorado Z. mays fields to use WEEDCAM is estimated as $2.71 per core for the seed bank and $0.08 per quadrat for seedlings.

Keywords

Zea mays L., cornBioeconomic modelsamplingseed bankseedlingsweed management decision modelweed scouting
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 6 , December 1999 , pp. 667 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andreasen, C., Rudemo, M., and Sevestre, S. 1997. Assessment of weed density at an early stage by use of image processing. Weed Res. 37:5–18.Google Scholar
Benoit, D. L., Derksen, D. A., and Panneton, B. 1992. Innovative approaches to seed bank samples. Weed Sci. 40:660–669.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Maxwell, B. D. 1993. Seed separation and enumeration from soil using K2CO3-centrifugation and image analysis. Weed Sci. 41:298–302.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Sparrow, D. H., and McCoy, E. L. 1995. Analysis of spatial distribution of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:258–268.Google Scholar
Dessaint, F., Chadoeuf, R., and Barralis, G. 1991. Spatial pattern analysis of weed seeds in the cultivated seed bank. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:721–730.Google Scholar
Gross, K. L. and Renner, K. A. 1989. A new method for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Weed Sci. 37:836–839.Google Scholar
Ives, P. M. and Moon, R. D. 1987. Sampling theory and protocol for insects. Pages 49–75 in Teng, P. S., ed., Crop Loss Assessment. St. Paul, MN: APS Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Mortensen, D. A., Young, L. J., and Gotway, C. A. 1996. Spatial and temporal analysis of weed seedling populations using geostatistics. Weed Sci. 44:704–710.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J. 1986. Elements of Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan. p. 511 Google Scholar
Lybecker, D. W., Schweizer, E. E., and King, R. P. 1991. Weed management decision in corn based on bioeconomic modeling. Weed Sci. 39:124–129.Google Scholar
Mortensen, D. A. and Coble, H. D. 1991. Two approaches to weed control decision-aid software. Weed Technol. 5:445–452.Google Scholar
Mortensen, D. A., Johnson, G. A., and Young, L. J. 1993. Weed distribution in agricultural fields. Pages 113–123 in Robert, P. C., Rust, R. H., and Larson, W. E., eds. Soil Specific Crop Management. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Nyrop, J. P., Foster, R. E., and Onstad, D. W. 1986. Value of sample information in pest control decision making. J. Econ. Entomol. 79:1421–1429.Google Scholar
Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., Wiles, L. J., and Westra, P. 1993. Bioeconomic weed management models in crop production. Pages 103–107 in Buxton, D. R., Shibles, R., Forsberg, R. A., Blad, B. L., Asay, K. H., Paulsen, G. M., and Wilson, R. F., eds. International Crop Science I. Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1976. Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley. pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J. 1990. A decision analytic investigation of the influence of weed spatial distribution on postemergence herbicide decisions for soybeans (Glycine max). . North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 143 p.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., Oliver, G. W., York, A. C., Gold, H. J., and Wilkerson, G. G. 1992a. Spatial distributions of broadleaf weeds in North Carolina soybean (Glycine max) fields. Weed Sci. 40:554–557.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., Wilkerson, G. G., and Gold, H. J. 1992b. Simulating weed scouting and weed control decision making to evaluate scouting plans. Pages 1166–1171 in Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington VA.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., Barlin, D. H., Schweizer, E. E., Duke, H. R., and Whitt, D. E. 1996. A new soil sampler and elutriator for collecting and extracting weed seeds from soil. Weed Technol. 10:35–41.Google Scholar