Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:40:03.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation cotton production in the southern United States: herbicide dissipation in soil and cover crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Martin A. Locke ,
Robert M. Zablotowicz ,
Philip J. Bauer ,
R. Wade Steinriede  and
Lewis A. Gaston
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS-SWSRU, Stoneville, MS 38776
Philip J. Bauer
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, CPSWPRC, Florence, SC 29501
R. Wade Steinriede
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS-WQERU, Stoneville, MS 38776
Lewis A. Gaston
Affiliation:
LSU AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil and surface residues from cotton field studies in Stoneville, MS (1994 through 1996) and Florence, SC (1995 through 1996) were sampled to evaluate effects of cover crop and tillage on herbicide dissipation. Mississippi treatments included tillage (conventional [CT]; none [NT]) and cover crop (ryegrass; none [NC]). South Carolina treatments included tillage (CT; reduced tillage [RT]) and cover crop (rye; NC). Fluometuron was applied preemergence (PRE) in both Mississippi and South Carolina, and norflurazon was applied PRE in Mississippi. Soils were sampled various times during the growing season (depths: 0 to 2 cm, 2 to 10 cm). Cover crop residues were sampled from RT or NT cover crop areas. Soil and cover crop sample extracts were analyzed for herbicides. Soil organic carbon tended to increase with tillage reduction and presence of cover crop and was positively correlated with herbicide sorption, especially in the surface. Across locations, herbicide half-lives ranged from 7 to 15 d in the soil surface. Tillage had mixed effects on herbicide persistence in surface soil, with higher herbicide concentrations in CT at early samplings, but differences were insignificant later on. The most consistent effects were observed in RT/NT with cover crops, where cover crop residues intercepted applied herbicide, impeding subsequent movement into soil. Herbicide dissipation in cover crop residues was often more rapid than in soil, with half-lives from 3 to 11 d. Herbicide retention in cover crop residues and rapid dissipation were attributed to strong herbicide affinity to cover crop residues (e.g., fluometuron Kd = 7.1 [in rye]; Kd = 1.65 [in Mississippi Dundee soil CT, NC]) and herbicide co-metabolism as cover crop residues decomposed. A fluometuron metabolite, desmethyl-fluometuron, was observed in most soil and cover crop samples after 1 wk. Only minimal herbicide or metabolite moved into the subsurface, and little treatment effect could be ascribed to herbicide or metabolite movement below 2 cm.

Keywords

Desmethyl fluometuronfluometuronglyphosatenorflurazonparaquatpendimethalincotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 506’, ‘Delta & Pine Land DES 119’Italian ryegrass, Lolium multiforum Lam.rye, Secale cereale L.Cover cropcrop residueherbicide degradationreduced tillagesoil depth
Type
Soil Air and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 717 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bauer, P. J. and Busscher, W. J. 1996. Winter cover and tillage influences on coastal plain cotton production. J. Prod. Agric 9:50–54.Google Scholar
Bottomley, P. J., Sawyer, T. E., Boersma, L., Dick, R. P., and Hemphill, D. D. 1999. Winter cover crop enhances 2,4-D mineralization potential of surface and subsurface soil. Soil Biol. Biochem 31:849–857.Google Scholar
Brown, B. A., Hayes, R. M., Tyler, D. D., and Mueller, T. C. 1994. Effect of tillage and cover crop on fluometuron adsorption and degradation under controlled conditions. Weed Sci 44:171–175.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. 1992. Sorption–desorption kinetics of alachlor in surface soil from two soybean tillage systems. J. Environ. Qual 21:558–566.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Bryson, C. T. 1997. Herbicide–soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Sci 45:307–320.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Zablotowicz, R. M. 2004. Pesticides in soil: benefits and limitations to soil health. Pages 239–260 in Schjonning, P., Elmholt, S., and Christensen, B. T. eds. Managing Soil Quality—Challenges in Modern Agriculture. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Harper, S. S. 1991. Metribuzin degradation in soil, II: effects of tillage. Pestic. Sci 31:239–247.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A., Gaston, L. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1997. Acifluorfen sorption and sorption kinetics in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem 45:286–293.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Gaston, L. A. 1995. Fluometuron interactions in crop residue–managed soils. Pages 55–59 in Kingery, W. L. and Buehring, N. eds. Conservation Farming: A Focus on Water Quality. MAFES Spec. Bull. 88–97. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A., Zablotowicz, R. M., Steinriede, R. W., and Dabney, S. M. 2002. Conservation management practices in Mississippi Delta agriculture: implications for crop production and environmental quality. Pages 320–326 in van Santen, E. ed. Making Conservation Tillage Conventional: Building a Future on 25 Years of Research. Alabama Agric. Expt. Stn. and Auburn University Special Report No. 1.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pages 961–1010 in Bigham, J. M. ed. Methods of soil analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Ser. No. 5, Madison, WI: Soil Science Society America.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Locke, M. A. 1996. Imazaquin spray retention, foliar washoff, and runoff losses under simulated rainfall. Pestic. Sci 48:179–187.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Bryson, C. T. 1994. Foliar washoff and runoff losses of lactofen, norflurazon, and fluometuron under simulated rainfall. J. Agric. Food Chem 42:2338–2343.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Gaston, L. A. 1997. Tillage and cover crop effects on cyanazine adsorption and desorption kinetics. Soil Sci 162:501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., and Koger, C. H. 2003. Cover crop, tillage, and herbicide effects on weeds, soil properties, microbial populations, and soybean yield. Weed Sci 51:987–994.Google Scholar
Rhoton, F. E. 2000. Influence of time on soil response to no-till practices. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 64:700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2001. The SAS System for Windows. Release 8.2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R., Shelton, D. R., Sadeghi, A. M., and Isensee, A. R. 2003. Influence of hairy vetch residue on atrazine and metolachlor soil solution concentration and weed emergence. Weed Sci 51:628–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurman, E. M., Koplin, D. W., Goolsby, D. A., and Meyer, M. T. 1998. Source and transport of desethylatrazine and desisopropylatrazine to groundwater of the Midwestern United States. Pages 189–207 in Ballantine, L. G., McFarland, J. E., and Hackett, D. S. eds. Triazine Herbicides Risk Assessment, ACS Symp. Ser. 683. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Wagner, S. C., Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., Smeda, R. J., and Bryson, C. T. 1995. Influence of herbicide-desiccated cover crops on biological soil quality in the Mississippi Delta. Pages 86–89 in Kingery, W. L. and Buehring, N. eds. Conservation Farming: A Focus on Water Quality. MAFES Spec. Bull. 88-7. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., Gaston, L. A., and Bryson, C. T. 2000. Interactions of tillage and soil depth on fluometuron degradation in a Dundee silt loam soil. Soil Till. Res 57:61–68.Google Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., and Smeda, R. J. 1998. Degradation of 2,4-D and fluometuron in cover crop residues. Chemosphere 37:87–101.Google Scholar